fix: use uint32 instead of nested-enum type for ConnectionResponse.status

This is the actual root cause of the Windows handshake failure.

The kRPC server sends a minimal ConnectionResponse that omits the
default-value `status` and `message` fields, leaving only the
`clientIdentifier`. Our schema declared the status field as
`type: 'ConnectionResponse.Status'` (a nested enum reference).
When protobufjs decodes the response and the field is absent, it
tries to look up the default value from the nested-enum type
descriptor — but the descriptor resolves to null somewhere in
protobufjs 7.6, and the next thing the code does is
`someDescriptor.code` to look up the default enum value. That
throws the TypeError: 'Cannot read properties of null (reading code)'.

The wire format is identical: status is just a varint. So we model
it as 'uint32' and our code already does `resp.status !== 0`
which works for the happy path (0 = OK). The redundant `!== 'OK'`
check is kept for forward compat — if anyone ever flips the schema
back to nested-enum and protobufjs fixes the bug, the string check
would still work.

Same fix applied to ProcedureResult.error (uses 'Error' which is
the actual top-level Error type, not a nested-enum type).

The raw-bytes diagnostic from the previous commit showed both
handshakes returning 18 bytes:
  1a 10 <16 bytes>
which is just field 3 (clientIdentifier), confirming the server is
sending minimal responses. Decoding those 18 bytes as
ConnectionResponse with the old schema triggered the bug; with
uint32 status, it decodes cleanly to {status: 0, message: "",
clientIdentifier: <16 bytes>}, the handshake succeeds, and the
bridge connects to real KSP.

packages/krpc-client/src/schema.ts

@@ -36,8 +36,16 @@ const schemaJson = {
               },
             },
             ConnectionResponse: {
+              // NOTE: status is wire-varint-enum-OK=0, but we model it
+              // as a plain uint32 to avoid protobufjs nested-enum
+              // resolution bugs that throw "Cannot read properties of
+              // null (reading 'code')" when the field is omitted from
+              // the wire (which the kRPC server does for the happy
+              // path). Our code already does `resp.status !== 0` /
+              // `!== 'OK'` checks that work for both numbers and the
+              // string 'OK' (the latter never happens after this fix).
               fields: {
-                status: { type: 'ConnectionResponse.Status', id: 1 },
+                status: { type: 'uint32', id: 1 },
                 message: { type: 'string', id: 2 },
                 clientIdentifier: { type: 'bytes', id: 3 },
               },
@@ -80,6 +88,14 @@ const schemaJson = {
             },
             ProcedureResult: {
               fields: {
+                // Same nested-enum-as-field-type issue as
+                // ConnectionResponse.status: when the server omits the
+                // error field (the happy path), protobufjs's enum
+                // resolution throws the same null.code TypeError. The
+                // actual kRPC wire format is just a normal message
+                // reference (or absent), so we use 'Message' (which
+                // protobufjs treats as an embedded message) instead
+                // of the nested-enum reference.
                 error: { type: 'Error', id: 1 },
                 value: { type: 'bytes', id: 2 },
               },