Add company artifacts page (#7621)

## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Operators need a way to inspect files and work products created by
agents across a company without opening each issue one by one.
> - The existing issue detail surfaces already show attachments and
outputs, but there was no company-level artifacts index or search-result
affordance for artifact-like records.
> - The backend needed a company-scoped artifacts projection API that
preserves issue/run attribution and safe links back to source records.
> - The UI needed a first-class Artifacts page, sidebar entry, reusable
artifact cards, and deep-link handling that keeps company prefixes
intact.
> - This pull request adds the company artifacts API and page, then
wires artifacts into search and issue output surfaces.
> - The benefit is a single place to browse, filter, and open generated
work products and attachments while preserving company boundaries.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Fixes #7622.

Feature request fields:

- Problem/motivation: company operators need a consolidated artifacts
surface for attachments and work products produced by agents.
- Proposed solution: add a company-scoped artifacts projection endpoint,
a board Artifacts route, reusable cards, sidebar navigation, and
artifact search integration.
- Alternatives considered: keep artifact discovery only on individual
issue pages; that forces operators to know the source issue before
finding generated outputs.
- Roadmap alignment: checked `ROADMAP.md`; this is a focused board
UI/API improvement and does not duplicate a listed roadmap item.

## What Changed

- Added shared artifact types and validators.
- Added a company-scoped artifact projection service/API with tests for
attachment/work-product attribution.
- Added Artifacts board UI route, API client, sidebar link, cards,
filters, and storybook coverage.
- Added artifact result handling to company search and issue
output/deep-link flows.
- Rebased the branch onto the latest `public-gh/master` state and
resolved the route-test conflict by preserving both upstream
team-catalog coverage and artifact route coverage.
- Fixed a local Sidebar test helper so it no longer depends on a
runtime-undefined `React.act` export in this dependency install.

## Verification

- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui exec vitest run
src/components/artifacts/ArtifactCard.test.tsx src/api/artifacts.test.ts
src/lib/company-routes.test.ts`
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui exec vitest run
src/pages/Artifacts.test.tsx src/pages/Search.test.tsx
src/components/Sidebar.test.tsx`
- `pnpm exec vitest run
server/src/__tests__/company-artifacts-service.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/company-search-service.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/company-search-rate-limit-routes.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/issue-agent-mutation-ownership-routes.test.ts`
- Confirmed the PR diff does not include `pnpm-lock.yaml` or
`.github/workflows/*`.
- Duplicate search: no open PRs or issues found for `artifact page
ArtifactCard` in `paperclipai/paperclip`.

Screenshots are intentionally omitted per the internal task instruction
not to add design screenshots or images to this PR unless they are
specifically part of the work. I also attempted browser capture in this
runner, but `agent-browser` failed to launch Chrome and Playwright
Chromium is missing `libatk-1.0.so.0`.

## Risks

- Low-to-medium risk: this adds a new API projection and UI surface, so
attribution/link regressions could affect artifact navigation.
- Company scoping is covered in the new service/API tests.
- No database migrations are included.
- No lockfile or workflow changes are included.

> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, GPT-5 coding agent with tool use and local command
execution. Exact hosted model identifier is not exposed in this runtime.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [ ] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots (intentionally omitted per task instruction; browser capture
unavailable in this runner)
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
This commit is contained in:
Dotta
2026-06-05 13:11:05 -10:00
committed by GitHub
parent dbebf30c89
commit 4693d770aa
39 changed files with 2706 additions and 71 deletions
+78 -14
View File
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
// @vitest-environment jsdom
import { act } from "react";
import type { ReactNode } from "react";
import { flushSync } from "react-dom";
import { createRoot } from "react-dom/client";
import { MemoryRouter, Route, Routes } from "react-router-dom";
import { QueryClient, QueryClientProvider } from "@tanstack/react-query";
@@ -86,9 +86,8 @@ vi.mock("../components/Identity", () => ({
(globalThis as any).IS_REACT_ACT_ENVIRONMENT = true;
async function flush() {
await act(async () => {
await Promise.resolve();
});
await Promise.resolve();
await new Promise((resolve) => setTimeout(resolve, 0));
}
async function waitForAssertion(assertion: () => void, attempts = 50) {
@@ -110,7 +109,7 @@ function renderSearch(initialPath: string, container: HTMLDivElement, node?: Rea
const queryClient = new QueryClient({
defaultOptions: { queries: { retry: false } },
});
act(() => {
flushSync(() => {
root.render(
<QueryClientProvider client={queryClient}>
<MemoryRouter initialEntries={[initialPath]}>
@@ -170,7 +169,7 @@ describe("Search page", () => {
scope: "all",
limit: 20,
offset: 0,
countsByType: { issue: 1, agent: 0, project: 0 },
countsByType: { issue: 1, artifact: 0, agent: 0, project: 0 },
hasMore: false,
results: [
{
@@ -228,7 +227,72 @@ describe("Search page", () => {
expect(container.textContent).toContain("1 result");
});
act(() => {
flushSync(() => {
root.unmount();
});
});
it("renders artifact search results in the company search surface", async () => {
searchApiMock.search.mockResolvedValueOnce({
query: "launch brief",
normalizedQuery: "launch brief",
scope: "artifacts",
limit: 20,
offset: 0,
countsByType: { issue: 0, artifact: 1, agent: 0, project: 0 },
hasMore: false,
results: [
{
id: "document:artifact-1",
type: "artifact",
score: 140,
title: "Launch Artifact Brief",
href: "/PAP/issues/PAP-42#document-brief",
matchedFields: ["artifact"],
sourceLabel: "Artifact",
snippet: "launch brief preview text",
snippets: [
{
field: "artifact",
label: "Artifact",
text: "launch brief preview text",
highlights: [{ start: 0, end: 6 }],
},
],
artifact: {
id: "document:artifact-1",
source: "document",
mediaKind: "document",
issueId: "issue-42",
issueIdentifier: "PAP-42",
issueTitle: "Ship launch artifacts",
projectId: null,
projectName: null,
updatedAt: new Date().toISOString(),
},
updatedAt: new Date().toISOString(),
previewImageUrl: null,
},
],
});
const { root } = renderSearch("/search?q=launch+brief&scope=artifacts", container);
await waitForAssertion(() => {
expect(searchApiMock.search).toHaveBeenCalledWith("company-1", {
q: "launch brief",
scope: "artifacts",
limit: 20,
});
});
await waitForAssertion(() => {
expect(container.textContent).toContain("Launch Artifact Brief");
expect(container.textContent).toContain("PAP-42");
expect(container.textContent).toContain("launch brief preview text");
});
flushSync(() => {
root.unmount();
});
});
@@ -240,7 +304,7 @@ describe("Search page", () => {
scope: "all",
limit: 20,
offset: 0,
countsByType: { issue: 0, agent: 0, project: 0 },
countsByType: { issue: 0, artifact: 0, agent: 0, project: 0 },
hasMore: false,
results: [],
});
@@ -250,7 +314,7 @@ describe("Search page", () => {
const input = container.querySelector('input[aria-label="Search query"]') as HTMLInputElement;
expect(input).not.toBeNull();
act(() => {
flushSync(() => {
const nativeSetter = Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptor(
HTMLInputElement.prototype,
"value",
@@ -272,7 +336,7 @@ describe("Search page", () => {
});
});
act(() => {
flushSync(() => {
root.unmount();
});
});
@@ -284,7 +348,7 @@ describe("Search page", () => {
scope: "all",
limit: 20,
offset: 0,
countsByType: { issue: 1, agent: 0, project: 0 },
countsByType: { issue: 1, artifact: 0, agent: 0, project: 0 },
hasMore: false,
results: [
{
@@ -326,7 +390,7 @@ describe("Search page", () => {
expect(navigateMock).toHaveBeenCalledWith("/PAP/issues/PAP-3366", { replace: true });
});
act(() => {
flushSync(() => {
root.unmount();
});
});
@@ -338,7 +402,7 @@ describe("Search page", () => {
scope: "comments",
limit: 20,
offset: 0,
countsByType: { issue: 0, agent: 0, project: 0 },
countsByType: { issue: 0, artifact: 0, agent: 0, project: 0 },
hasMore: false,
results: [],
});
@@ -351,7 +415,7 @@ describe("Search page", () => {
expect(container.textContent).toContain("Search all scopes");
});
act(() => {
flushSync(() => {
root.unmount();
});
});