[codex] Add checkbox confirmation issue interactions (#7649)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Agent work is coordinated through issues, comments, interactions, and approval-style handoffs. > - Existing issue-thread interactions could ask questions, suggest tasks, and request confirmation, but they did not support a structured checkbox confirmation payload for choosing one or more options. > - That gap made board/user confirmations harder to validate consistently across API callers, plugin helpers, CLI tooling, and the UI. > - This pull request adds the shared checkbox confirmation contract, server handling, client helpers, and issue-thread UI needed to render and submit structured selections. > - The benefit is that agents can request bounded multi-select confirmations in the same audited issue-thread flow as other Paperclip interactions. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description - No public GitHub issue found for this exact branch. Internal Paperclip issue: PAP-10415 / PAP-10441 requested creating this PR for the checkbox confirmation issue-thread UI component work. - GitHub duplicate search performed for checkbox confirmation / issue-thread interaction PRs; no matching open PR was found. - Related issue search result `#7497` was unrelated company file cleanup work, so it is not linked as a related issue. ## What Changed - Added shared types, validators, constants, and tests for `request_checkbox_confirmation` interactions. - Extended server issue-thread interaction service and routes for checkbox confirmation creation, validation, expiration, and response handling. - Added CLI, MCP, and plugin SDK helper coverage so external callers can create the new interaction shape consistently. - Updated the issue-thread interaction UI to render checkbox confirmations with min/max bounds, selection summaries, stale-target states, and accept/decline flows. - Documented the checkbox confirmation interaction contract in the Paperclip skill/API reference. ## Verification - Rebased cleanly on `paperclipai/paperclip` `master` fetched into `public-gh/master` at `a4fa0eaf5`. - Confirmed the PR diff does not include `pnpm-lock.yaml` or `.github/workflows` changes. - Ran focused tests with `NODE_ENV=test`: ```sh NODE_ENV=test pnpm run preflight:workspace-links NODE_ENV=test pnpm exec vitest run packages/shared/src/issue-thread-interactions.test.ts server/src/__tests__/issue-thread-interaction-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/issue-thread-interactions-service.test.ts ui/src/components/IssueThreadInteractionCard.test.tsx ui/src/lib/issue-thread-interactions.test.ts cli/src/__tests__/issue-subresources.test.ts cli/src/__tests__/project-goal.test.ts packages/mcp-server/src/tools.test.ts packages/plugins/sdk/tests/testing-actions.test.ts ``` Result: 8 test files passed, 78 tests passed. - CI on latest head `63b9e55` is green. - Greptile Review passed on latest head; GraphQL review-thread check shows all Greptile threads resolved. ## Risks - Medium surface area because the interaction contract touches shared validators, server routes/services, UI rendering, CLI, MCP, plugin SDK helpers, and docs. - No database migrations are included. - `pnpm-lock.yaml` is intentionally excluded per repository lockfile policy. - UI screenshots are not attached because the task explicitly requested not to add design screenshots or images unless they were part of the work; component tests cover the new rendering and interaction states. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex coding agent based on GPT-5, with repository file access, shell command execution, git/GitHub CLI tooling, and Paperclip control-plane API access. Exact hosted model ID/context-window metadata is not exposed inside this runtime. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [ ] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
This commit is contained in:
Dotta
@@ -542,6 +542,74 @@ describe.sequential("issue thread interaction routes", () => {
|
||||
);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it("accepts request checkbox confirmations with selected option ids and wakes the assignee", async () => {
|
||||
mockInteractionService.acceptInteraction.mockResolvedValueOnce({
|
||||
interaction: {
|
||||
id: "interaction-checkbox",
|
||||
companyId: "company-1",
|
||||
issueId: "aaaaaaaa-aaaa-4aaa-8aaa-aaaaaaaaaaaa",
|
||||
kind: "request_checkbox_confirmation",
|
||||
status: "accepted",
|
||||
continuationPolicy: "wake_assignee",
|
||||
idempotencyKey: null,
|
||||
sourceCommentId: null,
|
||||
sourceRunId: "run-checkbox",
|
||||
payload: {
|
||||
version: 1,
|
||||
prompt: "Delete selected files?",
|
||||
options: [
|
||||
{ id: "file-a", label: "a.txt" },
|
||||
{ id: "file-b", label: "b.txt" },
|
||||
],
|
||||
},
|
||||
result: {
|
||||
version: 1,
|
||||
outcome: "accepted",
|
||||
selectedOptionIds: ["file-b"],
|
||||
},
|
||||
createdAt: "2026-04-20T12:00:00.000Z",
|
||||
updatedAt: "2026-04-20T12:05:00.000Z",
|
||||
resolvedAt: "2026-04-20T12:05:00.000Z",
|
||||
},
|
||||
createdIssues: [],
|
||||
});
|
||||
const app = await createApp();
|
||||
|
||||
const res = await request(app)
|
||||
.post("/api/issues/aaaaaaaa-aaaa-4aaa-8aaa-aaaaaaaaaaaa/interactions/interaction-checkbox/accept")
|
||||
.send({ selectedOptionIds: ["file-b"] });
|
||||
|
||||
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
|
||||
expect(mockInteractionService.acceptInteraction).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
|
||||
expect.objectContaining({ id: "aaaaaaaa-aaaa-4aaa-8aaa-aaaaaaaaaaaa" }),
|
||||
"interaction-checkbox",
|
||||
{ selectedOptionIds: ["file-b"] },
|
||||
expect.objectContaining({ userId: "local-board" }),
|
||||
);
|
||||
expect(mockHeartbeatService.wakeup).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
|
||||
expect(mockHeartbeatService.wakeup).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
|
||||
ASSIGNEE_AGENT_ID,
|
||||
expect.objectContaining({
|
||||
reason: "issue_commented",
|
||||
payload: expect.objectContaining({
|
||||
interactionId: "interaction-checkbox",
|
||||
interactionKind: "request_checkbox_confirmation",
|
||||
interactionStatus: "accepted",
|
||||
}),
|
||||
}),
|
||||
);
|
||||
expect(mockLogActivity).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
|
||||
expect.anything(),
|
||||
expect.objectContaining({
|
||||
action: "issue.thread_interaction_accepted",
|
||||
details: expect.objectContaining({
|
||||
interactionKind: "request_checkbox_confirmation",
|
||||
interactionStatus: "accepted",
|
||||
}),
|
||||
}),
|
||||
);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it("forces a fresh workspace-aware session when accepting a planning confirmation", async () => {
|
||||
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValueOnce(createIssue({ workMode: "planning" }));
|
||||
mockInteractionService.acceptInteraction.mockResolvedValueOnce({
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -746,6 +746,164 @@ describeEmbeddedPostgres("issueThreadInteractionService", () => {
|
||||
})).rejects.toThrow("A decline reason is required for this confirmation");
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it("accepts request_checkbox_confirmation interactions with selected option ids", async () => {
|
||||
const { companyId, goalId, issueId } = await seedConfirmationIssue("Checkbox confirmation accept");
|
||||
|
||||
const created = await interactionsSvc.create({
|
||||
id: issueId,
|
||||
companyId,
|
||||
}, {
|
||||
kind: "request_checkbox_confirmation",
|
||||
payload: {
|
||||
version: 1,
|
||||
prompt: "Which files should be deleted?",
|
||||
options: [
|
||||
{ id: "file-a", label: "a.txt" },
|
||||
{ id: "file-b", label: "b.txt" },
|
||||
{ id: "file-c", label: "c.txt" },
|
||||
],
|
||||
defaultSelectedOptionIds: ["file-a"],
|
||||
minSelected: 0,
|
||||
maxSelected: 2,
|
||||
},
|
||||
}, {
|
||||
userId: "local-board",
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
expect(created).toMatchObject({
|
||||
kind: "request_checkbox_confirmation",
|
||||
status: "pending",
|
||||
continuationPolicy: "wake_assignee",
|
||||
payload: {
|
||||
supersedeOnUserComment: true,
|
||||
allowDeclineReason: true,
|
||||
},
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
const accepted = await interactionsSvc.acceptInteraction({
|
||||
id: issueId,
|
||||
companyId,
|
||||
goalId,
|
||||
projectId: null,
|
||||
}, created.id, {
|
||||
selectedOptionIds: ["file-c", "file-a"],
|
||||
}, {
|
||||
userId: "local-board",
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
expect(accepted.createdIssues).toEqual([]);
|
||||
expect(accepted.interaction).toMatchObject({
|
||||
kind: "request_checkbox_confirmation",
|
||||
status: "accepted",
|
||||
result: {
|
||||
version: 1,
|
||||
outcome: "accepted",
|
||||
selectedOptionIds: ["file-a", "file-c"],
|
||||
},
|
||||
resolvedByUserId: "local-board",
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it("enforces request_checkbox_confirmation selected option references and bounds", async () => {
|
||||
const { companyId, goalId, issueId } = await seedConfirmationIssue("Checkbox confirmation bounds");
|
||||
|
||||
const created = await interactionsSvc.create({
|
||||
id: issueId,
|
||||
companyId,
|
||||
}, {
|
||||
kind: "request_checkbox_confirmation",
|
||||
payload: {
|
||||
version: 1,
|
||||
prompt: "Pick one or two options.",
|
||||
options: [
|
||||
{ id: "one", label: "One" },
|
||||
{ id: "two", label: "Two" },
|
||||
{ id: "three", label: "Three" },
|
||||
],
|
||||
defaultSelectedOptionIds: ["one"],
|
||||
minSelected: 1,
|
||||
maxSelected: 2,
|
||||
},
|
||||
}, {
|
||||
userId: "local-board",
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
await expect(interactionsSvc.acceptInteraction({
|
||||
id: issueId,
|
||||
companyId,
|
||||
goalId,
|
||||
projectId: null,
|
||||
}, created.id, {
|
||||
selectedOptionIds: [],
|
||||
}, {
|
||||
userId: "local-board",
|
||||
})).rejects.toThrow("Select at least 1 checkbox confirmation option(s)");
|
||||
|
||||
await expect(interactionsSvc.acceptInteraction({
|
||||
id: issueId,
|
||||
companyId,
|
||||
goalId,
|
||||
projectId: null,
|
||||
}, created.id, {
|
||||
selectedOptionIds: ["missing"],
|
||||
}, {
|
||||
userId: "local-board",
|
||||
})).rejects.toThrow("Unknown checkbox confirmation optionId: missing");
|
||||
|
||||
await expect(interactionsSvc.acceptInteraction({
|
||||
id: issueId,
|
||||
companyId,
|
||||
goalId,
|
||||
projectId: null,
|
||||
}, created.id, {
|
||||
selectedOptionIds: ["one", "two", "three"],
|
||||
}, {
|
||||
userId: "local-board",
|
||||
})).rejects.toThrow("Select no more than 2 checkbox confirmation option(s)");
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it("expires request_checkbox_confirmation interactions when a user comments after creation", async () => {
|
||||
const { companyId, issueId } = await seedConfirmationIssue("Checkbox confirmation supersede");
|
||||
const commentId = randomUUID();
|
||||
|
||||
const created = await interactionsSvc.create({
|
||||
id: issueId,
|
||||
companyId,
|
||||
}, {
|
||||
kind: "request_checkbox_confirmation",
|
||||
payload: {
|
||||
version: 1,
|
||||
prompt: "Which files should be deleted?",
|
||||
options: [{ id: "file-a", label: "a.txt" }],
|
||||
},
|
||||
}, {
|
||||
userId: "local-board",
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
const expired = await interactionsSvc.expireRequestConfirmationsSupersededByComment({
|
||||
id: issueId,
|
||||
companyId,
|
||||
}, {
|
||||
id: commentId,
|
||||
createdAt: new Date(new Date(created.createdAt).getTime() + 1_000),
|
||||
authorUserId: "local-board",
|
||||
}, {
|
||||
userId: "local-board",
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
expect(expired).toHaveLength(1);
|
||||
expect(expired[0]).toMatchObject({
|
||||
id: created.id,
|
||||
kind: "request_checkbox_confirmation",
|
||||
status: "expired",
|
||||
result: {
|
||||
version: 1,
|
||||
outcome: "superseded_by_comment",
|
||||
commentId,
|
||||
},
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it("returns agent-authored request confirmations to the creating agent when a board user accepts", async () => {
|
||||
const companyId = randomUUID();
|
||||
const goalId = randomUUID();
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user