[codex] Move instance settings under company settings (#7680)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Operators manage both company-scoped configuration and instance-level runtime/admin settings from the board UI > - Instance settings previously lived as their own top-level sidebar area, separate from the company settings context operators already use > - That split made settings navigation feel heavier and made instance configuration less discoverable from the settings tab > - This pull request moves instance settings under company settings while preserving the existing instance settings routes and plugin/admin surfaces > - The benefit is a smaller primary sidebar and a more coherent settings hierarchy for operators ## Linked Issues or Issue Description - Refs #338 - Internal: PAP-10491, PAP-10538 ## What Changed - Moved instance settings navigation under the company settings area. - Added route helpers and sidebar entries for nested instance settings paths. - Updated plugin/admin settings routes to use the company settings instance scope. - Preserved legacy instance-settings bookmarks through compatibility redirects that keep the active company prefix. - Updated focused UI and plugin tests for the new navigation shape. - Stabilized the process-loss retry test that was failing the serialized server shard in CI. - Rebased the branch onto current `paperclipai/paperclip` `master` and pushed the current head. ## Verification - `pnpm exec vitest run ui/src/components/CompanySettingsSidebar.test.tsx ui/src/components/access/CompanySettingsNav.test.tsx ui/src/lib/instance-settings.test.ts ui/src/components/InstanceSidebar.test.tsx ui/src/components/Layout.test.tsx ui/src/components/SidebarAccountMenu.test.tsx ui/src/pages/PluginPage.test.tsx ui/src/plugins/bridge.test.ts packages/shared/src/validators/plugin.test.ts` - `pnpm exec vitest run ui/src/lib/instance-settings.test.ts ui/src/components/CompanySettingsSidebar.test.tsx ui/src/components/access/CompanySettingsNav.test.tsx ui/src/components/Layout.test.tsx ui/src/plugins/bridge.test.ts` - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-process-recovery.test.ts -t "queues exactly one retry when the recorded local pid is dead"` - `pnpm test:run:serialized -- --shard-index 0 --shard-count 4` - GitHub PR checks are green on head `fe7b0955169dcae55cbe10889c1876a70ab0b80c`, including `verify`, `General tests (server)`, all serialized server shards, build, e2e, policy, security checks, and Greptile. - Confirmed the PR diff does not include `pnpm-lock.yaml` or `.github/workflows` changes. ## Risks - Medium UI/navigation risk: instance settings links are intentionally moving under company settings, so stale external bookmarks to legacy paths rely on the compatibility routing in this branch. - Low test-only risk from the CI stabilization commit: it makes the recovery assertion select the actual retry run by `retryOfRunId` instead of whichever non-original run appears first. - No database migrations. - No dependency lockfile or workflow changes. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex coding agent based on GPT-5, with shell/tool execution in a local repository worktree. Exact context window was not exposed by the runtime. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [ ] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,6 +1,5 @@
|
||||
// @vitest-environment jsdom
|
||||
|
||||
import { act } from "react";
|
||||
import { createRoot } from "react-dom/client";
|
||||
import { QueryClient, QueryClientProvider } from "@tanstack/react-query";
|
||||
import { afterEach, beforeEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from "vitest";
|
||||
@@ -44,6 +43,12 @@ vi.mock("../context/ThemeContext", () => ({
|
||||
// eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any
|
||||
(globalThis as any).IS_REACT_ACT_ENVIRONMENT = true;
|
||||
|
||||
async function act(callback: () => void | Promise<void>) {
|
||||
await callback();
|
||||
await Promise.resolve();
|
||||
await new Promise((resolve) => window.setTimeout(resolve, 0));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
async function flushReact() {
|
||||
await act(async () => {
|
||||
await Promise.resolve();
|
||||
@@ -85,7 +90,6 @@ describe("SidebarAccountMenu", () => {
|
||||
<QueryClientProvider client={queryClient}>
|
||||
<SidebarAccountMenu
|
||||
deploymentMode="authenticated"
|
||||
instanceSettingsTarget="/instance/settings/general"
|
||||
version="1.2.3"
|
||||
/>
|
||||
</QueryClientProvider>,
|
||||
@@ -106,11 +110,13 @@ describe("SidebarAccountMenu", () => {
|
||||
await flushReact();
|
||||
|
||||
expect(document.body.textContent).toContain("Edit profile");
|
||||
expect(document.body.textContent).not.toContain("Instance settings");
|
||||
expect(document.body.textContent).toContain("Documentation");
|
||||
expect(document.body.textContent).toContain("Paperclip v1.2.3");
|
||||
expect(document.body.textContent).toContain("jane@example.com");
|
||||
expect(document.body.querySelector('[data-slot="popover-content"]')?.className)
|
||||
.toContain("w-[277px]");
|
||||
expect(document.body.querySelector('a[href="/company/settings/instance/profile"]')).not.toBeNull();
|
||||
|
||||
await act(async () => {
|
||||
root.unmount();
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user