Arnike/paperclip
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
2,780 Commits 2 Branches 0 Tags
3b9f36403e862f4646fac1ed91f321116fac61c0
Commit Graph

3 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Dotta fae7e920a9 [codex] Polish routine layout follow-ups (#7858) 
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - Routines are the recurring-work surface that lets a company keep
operating without a human manually kicking off every task
> - The base routine detail Variation C shell already landed in #7848,
but the follow-up branch still had polish work for scheduling, section
ergonomics, and the list layout
> - Operators need routine edit screens to explain trigger behavior
clearly, keep long detail pages usable on mobile/touch devices, and make
grouped routine lists easier to scan
> - This pull request rebases the remaining branch work onto current
`master`, drops the duplicate commits already merged through #7848, and
keeps only the new routine UI follow-ups
> - The benefit is a cleaner routines workflow without reopening the
already-merged shell work or carrying unrelated lockfile, workflow, or
screenshot changes

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs #7848

Feature follow-up: polish the routines UI after the Variation C
routine-detail shell landed.

Problem / motivation:

- Routine trigger configuration needs clearer previews for manual,
schedule, API, and webhook execution modes.
- Routine detail sections need better responsive spacing and touch
ergonomics.
- The routines list grouping should scan like grouped records instead of
a table with heavy row dividers.
- The routine tests need a React 19-compatible render helper so the
focused routine suite can run in this workspace.

Proposed solution:

- Add cron-fire preview helpers and routine-run display helpers with
focused tests.
- Expand the routine editable and operate sections with richer trigger,
variable, run, activity, and history presentation.
- Adjust the routine detail shell and sub-sidebar spacing for
mobile/touch layout.
- Update grouped routine list presentation to use bordered group headers
with borderless rows.
- Switch affected routine tests to the repo's `flushSync` render-helper
pattern.

Alternatives considered:

- Leaving the duplicate pre-#7848 commits in the branch would recreate
conflicts and make the PR review much larger than the remaining change.
- Keeping grouped routine rows inside one bordered table was simpler,
but made the grouping hierarchy less legible.

Roadmap alignment:

- ROADMAP.md lists Scheduled Routines as a core shipped capability and
Output/Enforced Outcomes as ongoing priorities. This is polish on that
existing routines capability, not a new roadmap-level feature.

## What Changed

- Added routine scheduling preview helpers and tests for
cron/manual/API/webhook fire-policy display.
- Added routine run display helpers and tests for deduped trigger labels
and run-row subtitles.
- Polished routine detail sections, including trigger summaries, operate
views, and env/variable editing ergonomics.
- Adjusted routine detail page and sub-sidebar spacing so the
title/header area is less pinned and touch layouts center better.
- Reworked the routines list grouped layout so group headers are
bordered cards and routine rows are borderless inside each group.
- Added Storybook coverage for the routines list grouped layout and
updated the existing routine detail story.
- Repaired routine tests to use `flushSync` helpers compatible with the
installed React 19 runtime.

## Verification

- `pnpm exec vitest run ui/src/lib/cron-fires.test.ts
ui/src/lib/routine-run-display.test.ts ui/src/pages/Routines.test.tsx
ui/src/components/RoutineSubSidebar.test.tsx
ui/src/components/RoutineSaveBar.test.tsx`
  - Result: 5 test files passed, 37 tests passed.
- Confirmed the rebased PR diff does not include `pnpm-lock.yaml`,
`.github/workflows/*`, or committed screenshots.
- Confirmed `origin/master` is an ancestor of the pushed branch head
after rebase.

## Risks

- Medium UI risk: this touches the routine detail and routine list
surfaces, so visual regressions are possible in edge cases not covered
by the focused tests.
- Low data risk: no schema, migration, server API, or lockfile changes
are included.
- Review note: the branch intentionally force-pushed after rebasing
because the original first three commits were already merged through
#7848.

> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, GPT-5-based coding agent runtime, with repository
shell/tool access. Exact hosted runtime model identifier and
context-window size were not exposed in the execution environment.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [ ] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
 2026-06-09 18:55:01 -05:00
Dotta d734bd43d1 [codex] Roll up May 17 branch changes (#6210) 
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the control plane for autonomous AI companies, so agent
work needs visible ownership, recovery, and operator controls.
> - This local branch had accumulated several related control-plane
reliability and operator-experience fixes across recovery actions,
watchdog folding, model-profile defaults, mentions, markdown editing,
plugin launchers, and small UI polish.
> - The branch needed to be converted into a PR against the current
`origin/master` without losing dirty work or including lockfile/workflow
churn.
> - The safest standalone shape is a single rollup PR because the
recovery/server/UI files overlap heavily across the local commits and
splitting would create avoidable conflicts.
> - This pull request replays the local branch onto latest
`origin/master`, preserves the uncommitted work as logical commits, and
adds a Zod 4 validator compatibility fix found during verification.
> - The benefit is that the May 17 local branch can be reviewed and
merged as one coherent, conflict-free branch under the 100-file Greptile
limit.

## What Changed

- Rebased the local May 17 branch work onto current `origin/master` in a
dedicated worktree.
- Preserved and committed previously dirty changes for recovery retry
handling, plugin/sidebar launcher polish, and `.herenow` ignores.
- Added recovery-action behavior for returning source issues to `todo`
when retrying source-scoped recovery.
- Included the existing local recovery/liveness/watchdog fold, Codex
cheap-profile, markdown/mention, duplicate-agent, and UI polish commits
from the branch.
- Normalized shared validator `z.record(...)` schemas to explicit
string-key records for Zod 4 compatibility.
- Confirmed the PR has no `pnpm-lock.yaml` or `.github/workflows/*`
changes and stays below the 100-file Greptile limit.

## Verification

- `pnpm install --frozen-lockfile --ignore-scripts`
- `npm run install` in
`node_modules/.pnpm/sqlite3@5.1.7/node_modules/sqlite3` to build the
local native sqlite3 binding after installing with scripts disabled
- `pnpm exec vitest run packages/shared/src/validators/issue.test.ts
packages/shared/src/project-mentions.test.ts
packages/adapter-utils/src/server-utils.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-model-profile.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/issue-recovery-actions.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/issue-agent-mutation-ownership-routes.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-active-run-output-watchdog.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/plugin-local-folders.test.ts
ui/src/components/IssueRecoveryActionCard.test.tsx
ui/src/components/Sidebar.test.tsx
ui/src/components/SidebarAccountMenu.test.tsx
ui/src/components/IssueProperties.test.tsx
ui/src/components/MarkdownEditor.test.tsx
ui/src/components/MarkdownBody.test.tsx
ui/src/lib/duplicate-agent-payload.test.ts
ui/src/pages/Routines.test.tsx`
- First pass: 13 files passed with 201 passing tests; 3 server files
failed before sqlite3 native binding was built.
- After rebuilding sqlite3:
`server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-model-profile.test.ts`,
`server/src/__tests__/issue-recovery-actions.test.ts`, and
`server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-active-run-output-watchdog.test.ts`
passed/loaded; embedded Postgres tests were skipped by the local host
guard.
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/shared typecheck`
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/adapter-utils typecheck`
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck`
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck`

## Risks

- Medium risk: this is a broad rollup PR across recovery semantics,
server tests, shared validators, and UI surfaces.
- Some embedded Postgres tests skipped locally due the host guard, so CI
should provide the stronger database-backed signal.
- UI changes were covered by component tests, but no browser screenshot
was captured in this PR creation pass.
- This branch may overlap with existing recovery/liveness PR work; merge
this PR independently or restack/close overlapping branches rather than
merging duplicate implementations together.

> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.

## Model Used

- OpenAI Codex, GPT-5-based coding agent, tool-enabled local repository
and GitHub workflow, medium reasoning effort.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [ ] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
 2026-05-17 17:15:06 -05:00
Dotta 3c73ed26b5 Expand plugin host surface (#5205) 
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies
> - The plugin system is the extension boundary for optional product
capabilities
> - Rich plugins need more than a worker entrypoint: they need scoped
database storage, local project folders, managed agents/routines, host
navigation, and reusable UI components
> - The LLM Wiki work exposed those missing host surfaces while keeping
plugin code outside the core control plane
> - This pull request expands the core plugin host, SDK, server APIs,
and UI bridge so plugins can declare and use those surfaces
> - The benefit is that future plugins can integrate with Paperclip
through documented, validated contracts instead of bespoke server or UI
imports

## What Changed

- Added plugin-managed database namespaces and migration tracking,
including Drizzle schema/migration files and SQL validation for
namespace isolation.
- Added server support for plugin local folders, managed agents, managed
routines, scoped plugin APIs, and plugin operation visibility.
- Expanded shared plugin manifest/types/validators and SDK
host/testing/UI exports for richer plugin surfaces.
- Added reusable UI pieces for file trees, managed routines, resizable
sidebars, route sidebars, and plugin bridge initialization.
- Updated plugin docs and example plugins to use the expanded host and
SDK surface.

## Verification

- `pnpm install --frozen-lockfile`
- `pnpm run preflight:workspace-links && pnpm exec vitest run
packages/shared/src/validators/plugin.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/plugin-database.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/plugin-local-folders.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/plugin-managed-agents.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/plugin-managed-routines.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/plugin-orchestration-apis.test.ts
ui/src/api/plugins.test.ts ui/src/components/FileTree.test.tsx
ui/src/components/ResizableSidebarPane.test.tsx
ui/src/pages/PluginPage.test.tsx ui/src/plugins/bridge.test.ts` passed:
11 files, 67 tests.
- Confirmed this PR changes 89 files and does not include
`pnpm-lock.yaml` or `.github/workflows/*`.

## Risks

- Medium: this expands plugin host contracts across db/shared/server/ui
and includes a new core migration (`0076_useful_elektra.sql`).
- The plugin database namespace validator is intentionally restrictive;
plugin authors may need follow-up affordances for SQL patterns that
remain blocked.
- Merge this before the LLM Wiki plugin PR so the plugin can resolve the
new SDK and host APIs.

> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.

## Model Used

- OpenAI Codex, GPT-5 coding agent, tool-enabled shell/git/GitHub
workflow. Context window size was not exposed by the runtime.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
 2026-05-05 07:42:57 -05:00