985 Commits

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Dotta	468edd8b22	Add workspace file viewer and artifact links (#7681) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Agent work is issue-centered, and reviewers often need to inspect files, artifacts, and path references produced during that work. > - Before this branch, workspace-relative paths and artifact file references were not first-class inspectable objects in the board UI. > - Safe file viewing needs shared resource contracts, server-side workspace boundary checks, and UI that opens files without exposing arbitrary host paths. > - The workspace file viewer branch needed to stay as one active PR and be rebased onto current `paperclipai/paperclip:master` for review. > - This pull request adds the workspace file resource API, issue-page file viewer and browser, markdown file-reference links, and artifact file chips. > - The benefit is that board users can inspect relevant files from issue context while preserving workspace boundaries and auditability. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public GitHub issue exists for this branch. Internal Paperclip issues: `PAP-1953`, `PAP-10539`, `PAP-10733`. Problem / motivation: - Board users need to open workspace-relative files mentioned by agents or attached as work-product metadata without switching to a terminal. - The UI needs to support both direct file-path opening and workspace browsing/searching from an issue page. - The server must enforce company access, workspace boundaries, size limits, rate limits, and safe audit logging. Related PR: - Prior closed attempt: #4442 - Single active PR for this branch: #7681 ## What Changed - Added shared workspace file resource types, validators, and workspace-file `resourceRef` metadata validation for work products. - Added server routes/services for resolving, listing, and previewing workspace-relative files with access checks, scan caps, list-specific limits, and audit logging. - Added the issue file viewer provider, sheet, workspace browser, command-palette action, markdown workspace-file autolinks, and artifact file chips. - Updated issue workspace UI and stories/tests for file browsing and workspace file opening. - Rebased the branch onto current `paperclipai/paperclip:master` and updated the existing single PR branch. - Addressed current-head Greptile follow-ups by applying `offset` consistently across search/recent/changed file listings, restoring stopped-service port ownership checks before auto-port reuse, and stabilizing the workspace browser pagination test. ## Verification Current local verification after rebase to `public/master`: - `pnpm exec vitest run packages/shared/src/work-product.test.ts server/src/__tests__/file-resources.test.ts server/src/__tests__/instance-settings-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/instance-settings-service.test.ts server/src/__tests__/workspace-runtime.test.ts ui/src/components/FileViewerSheet.test.tsx ui/src/components/FileViewerSheet.copy.test.tsx ui/src/components/WorkspaceFileBrowser.test.tsx ui/src/components/WorkspaceFileMarkdownBody.test.tsx ui/src/context/FileViewerContext.test.ts ui/src/lib/remark-workspace-file-refs.test.ts ui/src/lib/workspace-file-parser.test.ts ui/src/components/IssueWorkspaceCard.test.tsx` - 13 files passed, 197 tests passed. - `pnpm -r --filter @paperclipai/shared --filter @paperclipai/server --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck` - passed. - `pnpm exec vitest run ui/src/components/WorkspaceFileBrowser.test.tsx` - 1 file passed, 25 tests passed. - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/file-resources.test.ts server/src/__tests__/workspace-runtime.test.ts` - 2 files passed, 90 tests passed. - `pnpm -r --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck` - passed. - Confirmed branch is `0` behind and `46` ahead of current `public/master` after rebase and follow-up commits. - Confirmed the PR diff does not include `pnpm-lock.yaml`. - Confirmed the PR diff does not include `.github/workflows` changes. - Searched GitHub for duplicate or related workspace file viewer PRs/issues; #4442 is the prior closed attempt and this PR is the single active PR for the branch. - No screenshots were committed; the task explicitly asked not to add design screenshots or images unless they were part of the work. Current remote verification on head `a698a7bc10137baf7d25bd5722e1d6e0343387c1`: - Greptile Review - success, 64 files reviewed, 0 comments added, no unresolved Greptile review threads. - PR workflow `verify` - success. - Typecheck + Release Registry, General tests, workspace test shards, serialized server suites, Build, Canary Dry Run, e2e, Socket, and Snyk - success. - `security-review` - neutral, with output saying a draft advisory was filed for maintainer review and is not a merge block. - `commitperclip PR Review / review` - cancelled after the security gate detected flags and timed out while creating/reviewing the advisory. I reran it once and it cancelled the same way; no actionable code/test failure was exposed in the job logs. ## Risks - This is a broad UI/server feature PR, so review needs to pay attention to route authorization, workspace boundary handling, and markdown autolink false positives. - Workspace browsing intentionally caps list results and scan depth; very large workspaces may require users to refine search terms. - Remote workspace preview remains unavailable until remote file-access support is implemented. - The neutral commitperclip security-review advisory needs maintainer review, but the check output says it is not a merge block. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected - check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex, GPT-5 coding agent in a Paperclip/Codex local tool-use environment, medium reasoning, with shell/GitHub CLI tool use for branch inspection, verification, rebase, PR update, Greptile review, and CI inspection. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [ ] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-06-09 17:17:43 -05:00
Reasonofmoon	a0f7d3daba	Reset task session on timer-driven wakes (PF-4) (#4838) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies > - Each agent is woken via the heartbeat scheduler — `heartbeat_timer` for periodic interval wakes, `issue_assigned` / `execution_*` / `issue_commented` for event-driven wakes > - The heartbeat reuses the prior task session by default; only specific wake reasons trigger a fresh session via `shouldResetTaskSessionForWake` (assignment, review, approval, changes-requested) or explicit `forceFreshSession` > - In CEO run `292a5fd1`, repeated context compaction warnings appeared near the 64k threshold for the long-lived manager session — symptomatic of repeated `heartbeat_timer` wakes accumulating low-value "checked, nothing new" inbox-scan traces inside one ever-growing session > - PF-4 in the 2026-04-16 hangeul-school operational issue set asks for a compaction-aware session freshness policy: "manager sessions can rotate before low-value compaction pressure accumulates" and "repeated timer wakes do not indefinitely bloat the same session" > - This pull request adds `wakeReason === "heartbeat_timer"` to both `shouldResetTaskSessionForWake` and `describeSessionResetReason`, so each interval wake starts fresh and the run log explicitly records why. Event-driven wakes (`issue_commented`, `transient_failure_retry`, etc.) keep their existing reuse behavior. > - The benefit is that timer wakes — which are exploratory and carry no continuation state — stop bloating long-lived manager sessions. Compaction pressure that previously accumulated across N timer wakes is now bounded to a single interval's worth of context. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No external GitHub issue is linked. Describing the problem inline following the bug-report template: **What happened:** Long-lived manager/CEO agent sessions hit the 64k context-compaction threshold after many `heartbeat_timer` wakes accumulated low-value inbox-scan traces inside one ever-growing task session. Reproduced in CEO run `292a5fd1`. **Expected behavior:** Periodic timer wakes — which carry no continuation state — should not indefinitely bloat the same session. The heartbeat should rotate sessions on timer wakes the way it already does on assignment/review/approval/changes-requested wakes. **Actual behavior:** `shouldResetTaskSessionForWake` only reset on `issue_assigned`, `execution_review_requested`, `execution_approval_requested`, `execution_changes_requested`, or explicit `forceFreshSession`. `heartbeat_timer` reused the prior session indefinitely, causing compaction pressure. **Scope of fix:** Add `heartbeat_timer` to the reset list and to `describeSessionResetReason` so the run log records why. Event-driven wakes keep their existing reuse behavior. ## What Changed - `shouldResetTaskSessionForWake` (`server/src/services/heartbeat.ts`) now also returns `true` when `wakeReason === "heartbeat_timer"`. The existing reset reasons (`issue_assigned`, `execution_review_requested`, `execution_approval_requested`, `execution_changes_requested`, `forceFreshSession`) are unchanged. - `describeSessionResetReason` returns a paired explanation `"wake reason is heartbeat_timer (timer-driven wake starts fresh)"` so run logs make session reset behavior legible. - `describeSessionResetReason` was promoted from internal to `export` so the paired contract can be unit-tested directly alongside `shouldResetTaskSessionForWake`. This is the only API surface change in this PR. Wake reasons whose reuse behavior is intentionally **unchanged**: - `issue_commented` — the comment is the reason to engage; continuation context matters - `issue_comment_mentioned` — same rationale - `transient_failure_retry` — resuming a previously-failed run; want continuity - `process_lost_retry` — resuming after process loss; want continuity - `missing_issue_comment`, recovery reasons — out of scope; can be revisited as follow-ups if observed bloat shows up ## Verification ```bash cd server pnpm vitest run src/__tests__/heartbeat-timer-wake-session-reset-pf4.test.ts # 12/12 pass pnpm vitest run \ src/__tests__/heartbeat-stale-queue-invalidation.test.ts \ src/__tests__/heartbeat-process-recovery.test.ts \ src/__tests__/heartbeat-comment-wake-batching.test.ts # 48/48 adjacent heartbeat tests pass ``` The 12 new tests assert: 1. `shouldResetTaskSessionForWake` resets on `heartbeat_timer` 2. `shouldResetTaskSessionForWake` still resets on the four existing reasons 3. `forceFreshSession === true` still triggers reset 4. `issue_commented`, `transient_failure_retry`, unknown reasons, and null/undefined context do **not** trigger reset 5. `describeSessionResetReason` describes `heartbeat_timer` explicitly so logs are legible 6. `describeSessionResetReason` keeps the exact wording for the four existing reasons 7. `describeSessionResetReason` returns the `forceFreshSession` message 8. `describeSessionResetReason` returns `null` for non-resetting reasons 9. **Parity invariant**: the two functions agree on every input — `describeSessionResetReason(ctx)` is non-null iff `shouldResetTaskSessionForWake(ctx)` returns true. This locks the pair so future changes to one must update the other. ## Risks - **Low–medium.** This changes behavior for every `heartbeat_timer` wake on every agent: the prior task session is no longer reused. - For **manager / CEO agents** (the documented case): this is the intended improvement. Timer wakes carry no continuation state for these roles. - For **worker agents** that may have used timer wakes to resume in-flight work: any genuine continuation should already be triggered by issue/execution wake reasons (which still reuse) or by an active checkout being resumed via `process_lost_retry` / `transient_failure_retry`. Timer wakes themselves do not create checkouts. - If a deployment relied on timer wakes to preserve mid-task context — which is fragile by design — the right path is to switch to a non-timer wake reason or accept the reset. The PR doesn't add a new opt-out flag because the goal is to bound session size; introducing an opt-out would re-open the bloat path this PR is closing. - No schema or API surface change beyond exporting `describeSessionResetReason`. No migration. No client-visible API change. ## Model Used Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context), model ID `claude-opus-4-7[1m]`. Used in interactive Claude Code session with extended reasoning, tool use (Read/Edit/Write/Bash), and verification gates between exploration → fix → tests → push. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched the open PR list for similar/duplicate work — distinct from #4080 (force-fresh follow-up wake — codex/general) and #4195 (codex session reset on model change); this PR specifically targets the `heartbeat_timer` reuse path - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass (12 new + 48 adjacent = 60 tests, no regressions) - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots — N/A, server-only change - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes — none needed; the new export carries clear semantics and the run log message is self-explanatory - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Irene <irene@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Devin Foley <devin@devinfoley.com> Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> Co-authored-by: Devin Foley <devin@paperclip.ing>	2026-06-09 14:16:46 -07:00
Dotta	393e6f5e68	Add Claude Fable 5 and Mythos 5 to the model selector (#7826) ... ## Summary Adds the newly released Claude models from the [models overview](https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/models/overview) to the `claude_local` adapter's model selector: - **Claude Fable 5** (`claude-fable-5`) — generally available as of 2026-06-09, Anthropic's most capable widely-released model. - **Claude Mythos 5** (`claude-mythos-5`) — limited availability (Project Glasswing). **Opus 4.8 stays first in the list so it remains the default selection** — per the request, the new flagship models are *offered* but not defaulted (not Fable, not Mythos). ## Changes - `packages/adapters/claude-local/src/index.ts` — add `claude-fable-5` and `claude-mythos-5` to the adapter model list, right after `claude-opus-4-8`. - `packages/adapters/claude-local/src/server/models.ts` — add the Fable 5 Bedrock identifier (`us.anthropic.claude-fable-5-v1`) to the Bedrock fallback list. Mythos 5 is limited-availability on Bedrock, so it's intentionally left out of that fallback. - `server/src/__tests__/adapter-models.test.ts` — assert the new models are present and that `claude-opus-4-8` remains first (the default). These flow through the single `claudeModels` source, so they also appear in the ACPX combined list (`registry.ts` prefixes them with `Claude:`) and are recognized by the ACPX Claude model filter. The UI selector reads models dynamically from the adapter, so no UI changes are needed. ## Testing - `npx vitest run src/__tests__/adapter-models.test.ts` — 13 passed. 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-06-09 13:32:32 -05:00
Dotta	0a2230b2ec	[codex] Guard document comment wake boundaries (#7766) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The execution control plane uses issue comments, assignments, monitors, blockers, and interactions to decide when agent-owned work should wake and run. > - Top-level issue comments are actionable issue-thread feedback for the assignee, but document-scoped comments are review context unless they are converted into an explicit routing primitive. > - Document annotation comments were still wired into the same `issue_commented` wake path as top-level issue comments. > - That made document activity capable of waking an assignee and looking like an execution path even when no issue-level handoff happened. > - This pull request narrows the wake boundary so document annotation activity stays document-scoped while normal issue comments continue waking the assignee. > - The benefit is fewer spurious wakeups and clearer non-terminal issue liveness semantics. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Internal Paperclip work: [PAP-10613](/PAP/issues/PAP-10613), [PAP-10640](/PAP/issues/PAP-10640) Problem description: - Document annotation thread creation and annotation comments were treated as assignee wake sources. - Document-scoped activity should remain visible as document/review context, but should not by itself act as a queued issue wake, monitor, approval, interaction response, blocker, or terminal disposition. - Top-level issue comments should still wake the assignee on agent-assigned, non-terminal issues. Related PR search performed: - Found related prior document annotation work: #6733. - Found related prior issue-comment wake work and revert context: #7678, #7765. - No existing PR for `PAP-10613-why-is-this-task-not-running`. ## What Changed - Removed the document annotation comment assignee wake helper from issue routes. - Kept document annotation reference sync and activity logging intact. - Documented the distinction between top-level issue comments and document-scoped comments in `doc/execution-semantics.md`. - Added route tests proving document/document annotation activity does not wake the assignee. - Added route coverage proving top-level board issue comments still wake the assignee. ## Verification - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/document-annotation-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/issue-update-comment-wakeup-routes.test.ts` — 2 files passed, 9 tests passed. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck` — passed. - `git status -sb` — clean branch tracking `origin/PAP-10613-why-is-this-task-not-running`. ## Risks - Low to moderate behavior change: document annotation comments no longer wake the issue assignee automatically. - Operators who want document feedback to route work must use an explicit primitive such as assignment, issue-thread comment, agent mention, issue-thread interaction, approval, blocker, or delegated follow-up. - No database migration or public API shape change. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-5-based coding agent with shell/tool use enabled. Exact hosted runtime model identifier beyond GPT-5 was not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-06-08 11:29:42 -05:00
Dotta	7fb40264f8	[codex] Revert PR #7678 (#7765) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Issue comment wake handoffs are part of the control-plane execution loop that decides when agents resume work after comments and issue updates. > - PR #7678 changed that wake handoff behavior in server issue routes, heartbeat context, and related tests. > - The change broke an important workflow after merge, so the safest immediate fix is to restore the pre-#7678 wake behavior. > - This pull request reverts the wake-handoff behavior from PR #7678 while keeping narrow review-requested safeguards that prevent known runtime/test regressions. > - The benefit is that Paperclip returns to the last known working wake behavior without reintroducing avoidable UUID skill lookup and annotation-resolution test gaps. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs: #7678 Bug context: - What happened: PR #7678 was reported to have broken an important Paperclip workflow after it merged. - Expected behavior: Paperclip should preserve the prior issue comment wake handoff behavior until a corrected change is ready. - Steps to reproduce: Use the workflow affected by PR #7678's issue comment wake handoff changes. - Paperclip version/commit: `master` after merge commit `4da79a88c67e54084d40bd18cada5ee5c8be23da`. - Deployment mode: Paperclip control-plane server behavior. ## What Changed - Reverted merge commit `4da79a88c67e54084d40bd18cada5ee5c8be23da` from PR #7678 to restore pre-#7678 wake-handoff behavior. - Preserved the safe accepted-plan routing check so `parseObject(...)` is not used as a boolean. - Preserved UUID filtering for run-scoped skill mentions so legacy non-UUID skill IDs do not reach a Postgres UUID lookup. - Restored the annotation thread-resolution test guard that verifies resolving a thread does not wake the assignee. ## Verification - `pnpm run preflight:workspace-links && NODE_ENV=test PAPERCLIP_HOME=/tmp/... PAPERCLIP_INSTANCE_ID=pap10614-revert TMPDIR=/tmp/... pnpm exec vitest run --project @paperclipai/server --no-file-parallelism --maxWorkers=1 server/src/__tests__/document-annotation-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-project-env.test.ts server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-accepted-plan-workspace-refresh.test.ts server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-context-summary.test.ts` - Result: 4 test files passed, 26 tests passed. - Earlier targeted revert verification also passed: 4 test files, 50 tests. ## Risks - This intentionally restores behavior from before PR #7678, so intended wake-handoff improvements from that PR are removed. - The PR is no longer a byte-for-byte revert because Greptile identified two narrow safeguards worth preserving. - Low migration risk: no schema or dependency changes are included. - Follow-up work may still be needed to reintroduce the desired wake handoff behavior without the regression. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-5 coding agent in this Paperclip heartbeat, with shell/tool execution and repository write access. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge	2026-06-08 10:35:58 -05:00
Dotta	76c88e5855	[codex] Move instance settings under company settings (#7680) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Operators manage both company-scoped configuration and instance-level runtime/admin settings from the board UI > - Instance settings previously lived as their own top-level sidebar area, separate from the company settings context operators already use > - That split made settings navigation feel heavier and made instance configuration less discoverable from the settings tab > - This pull request moves instance settings under company settings while preserving the existing instance settings routes and plugin/admin surfaces > - The benefit is a smaller primary sidebar and a more coherent settings hierarchy for operators ## Linked Issues or Issue Description - Refs #338 - Internal: PAP-10491, PAP-10538 ## What Changed - Moved instance settings navigation under the company settings area. - Added route helpers and sidebar entries for nested instance settings paths. - Updated plugin/admin settings routes to use the company settings instance scope. - Preserved legacy instance-settings bookmarks through compatibility redirects that keep the active company prefix. - Updated focused UI and plugin tests for the new navigation shape. - Stabilized the process-loss retry test that was failing the serialized server shard in CI. - Rebased the branch onto current `paperclipai/paperclip` `master` and pushed the current head. ## Verification - `pnpm exec vitest run ui/src/components/CompanySettingsSidebar.test.tsx ui/src/components/access/CompanySettingsNav.test.tsx ui/src/lib/instance-settings.test.ts ui/src/components/InstanceSidebar.test.tsx ui/src/components/Layout.test.tsx ui/src/components/SidebarAccountMenu.test.tsx ui/src/pages/PluginPage.test.tsx ui/src/plugins/bridge.test.ts packages/shared/src/validators/plugin.test.ts` - `pnpm exec vitest run ui/src/lib/instance-settings.test.ts ui/src/components/CompanySettingsSidebar.test.tsx ui/src/components/access/CompanySettingsNav.test.tsx ui/src/components/Layout.test.tsx ui/src/plugins/bridge.test.ts` - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-process-recovery.test.ts -t "queues exactly one retry when the recorded local pid is dead"` - `pnpm test:run:serialized -- --shard-index 0 --shard-count 4` - GitHub PR checks are green on head `fe7b0955169dcae55cbe10889c1876a70ab0b80c`, including `verify`, `General tests (server)`, all serialized server shards, build, e2e, policy, security checks, and Greptile. - Confirmed the PR diff does not include `pnpm-lock.yaml` or `.github/workflows` changes. ## Risks - Medium UI/navigation risk: instance settings links are intentionally moving under company settings, so stale external bookmarks to legacy paths rely on the compatibility routing in this branch. - Low test-only risk from the CI stabilization commit: it makes the recovery assertion select the actual retry run by `retryOfRunId` instead of whichever non-original run appears first. - No database migrations. - No dependency lockfile or workflow changes. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex coding agent based on GPT-5, with shell/tool execution in a local repository worktree. Exact context window was not exposed by the runtime. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [ ] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-06-07 17:23:53 -05:00
Nour Eddine Hamaidi	823c2b115a	feat(adapters): allow external overrides of built-ins (#7394) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents through server-side adapters. > - Some adapters are bundled as built-ins, while external adapter plugins can provide newer or organization-specific implementations. > - The adapter registry already supports external plugins overriding a built-in type while keeping the built-in available as fallback. > - The hot-install API still rejected built-in adapter types before registration, so plugin installation did not match registry behavior. > - That blocked users from installing an external adapter update for a built-in adapter type such as `hermes_local`. > - This pull request removes the hot-install conflict guard and keeps the existing fallback lifecycle intact. > - The benefit is consistent adapter override behavior across startup registration, hot install, pause/resume, and removal. Fixes #7395 ## What Changed - Allows `POST /api/adapters/install` to register an external adapter whose type matches a built-in adapter. - Keeps built-in adapters protected from deletion unless there is an external plugin record for that adapter type. - Tightens the install route so `requiresRestart` is only reported on a true reinstall (existing external plugin record), not on a first-time override of a built-in adapter type. - Adds route coverage for installing a built-in type override, pausing back to the built-in implementation, deleting the override, and restoring the built-in adapter. ## Verification - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server exec vitest run src/__tests__/adapter-routes.test.ts src/__tests__/adapter-registry.test.ts` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck` - GitHub Actions passed for server tests, typecheck, build, serialized server suites, e2e, canary dry run, Socket, Snyk, Greptile, and policy checks on the prior pushed commit before the follow-up review fix. ## Risks - Low risk: this only changes the hot-install/removal lifecycle for external plugins targeting a built-in adapter type. - Built-in adapters remain protected when no external plugin record exists. - The existing registry fallback behavior restores the built-in adapter when an override is paused or removed. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex GPT-5.5 via Hermes Agent for the initial implementation and verification (terminal/file/GitHub tool use). - Anthropic Claude Opus 4.7 (claude-opus-4-7) via Paperclip Claude adapter for the Greptile-feedback follow-up commit (extended-thinking reasoning, terminal/file/GitHub tool use). ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and confirmed none exist for this hot-install override fix - [x] I have linked the existing issue with `Fixes #7395` - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: HenkDz <henkdz@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Devin Foley <devin@devinfoley.com> Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-06-07 10:47:01 -07:00
Dotta	2d1b531a49	[codex] Add clear-error agent action (#7695) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source control plane people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Agent runtime state is surfaced in both the server API and the board UI so operators can tell whether an agent is idle, running, paused, or in error. > - When an agent is already in `error`, the existing pause/resume action slot is not useful because there is no running work to pause. > - Operators need a direct, audited recovery path that clears the stale error state only for agents in the same company. > - This pull request adds a company-scoped clear-error mutation, exposes the shared API contract, and wires the board action cluster to show Clear error in the pause/resume slot for errored agents. > - The benefit is that operators can recover CEO/CTO-style errored agents without resorting to database edits or unrelated session reset actions. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #4021 Paperclip issue: PAP-10515 — right now the CEO and CTO agents are in error state, but there is no way to clear the error; they appear otherwise fine. ## What Changed - Added shared constants, API path, and agent status type support for a company-scoped clear-error action. - Added the server service and route to clear an agent from `error` back to `idle`, with company access enforcement and activity logging. - Added OpenAPI/docs coverage for the clear-error endpoint. - Added backend coverage for service behavior and cross-tenant authorization. - Updated the board agent action cluster to show a red-tinted Clear error button only when `agent.status === "error"`. - Updated agent properties to show a red active last-error indicator only while the agent is currently errored. - Added UI component tests for the error-state action and the non-error pause/resume behavior. ## Verification Local: - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/agents-service-clear-error.test.ts server/src/__tests__/agent-cross-tenant-authz-routes.test.ts ui/src/components/AgentActionButtons.test.tsx` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck` - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/openapi-routes.test.ts` PR checks: - Main Paperclip workflow is green on `a7378e584d50594e7bd507a1a02985bfaaa5abf8`. - Greptile is 5/5 with no files requiring special attention and no new comments on the latest review. - `commitperclip PR Review` is still red because its security-gate step canceled after filing a draft advisory; the linked `security-review` check is neutral and says the draft advisory is not a merge block. Visual artifact: -  ## Risks Low to medium risk. The mutation is intentionally narrow, but reviewers should check that clearing `lastError`/`lastRunError` and returning to `idle` is the desired recovery semantics for every adapter state. The remaining red check is from the external commitperclip security-review workflow, not from the code/test workflow for this PR. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-5-family coding model, tool-assisted with local shell, git, GitHub CLI, and targeted Vitest execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge	2026-06-07 10:33:29 -05:00
Dotta	4da79a88c6	[codex] Refine issue comment wake handoffs (#7678) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The heartbeat and issue-comment routes decide when an assigned agent wakes up and what context it receives. > - Passive comments and annotation notes can currently wake assignees even when no actionable state changed. > - Accepted planning confirmations also need to preserve recent plan comments so child-issue creation does not lose board/user constraints. > - Runtime skill mentions should only send UUID ids into database lookups, because legacy slug-like ids are not valid runtime skill ids. > - This pull request tightens those wake and handoff rules in one server-side branch. > - The benefit is fewer noisy agent wakeups and better accepted-plan continuation context without changing the task model. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Internal Paperclip task: [PAP-10535](/PAP/issues/PAP-10535). Problem or motivation: Passive comments and annotation notes could wake the current assignee even when no actionable state changed, and accepted plan continuations needed recent plan comments preserved in the wake handoff. Runtime skill mentions also needed to ignore non-UUID ids before database lookup. Proposed solution: Tighten server-side wake routing so passive comments do not wake assignees unless they reopen the issue, preserve mention-targeted wakeups, include recent non-deleted plan comments in accepted confirmation wake payloads, and guard runtime skill mention lookup to UUID-like ids. Alternatives considered: Leaving passive assignee wakeups in place was rejected because it keeps generating noisy non-actionable heartbeats. Treating every skill mention-like token as a runtime skill id was rejected because legacy slug-like ids are not valid runtime skill ids. Roadmap alignment: This aligns with the V1 control-plane heartbeat contract by making wakeups more intentional and preserving handoff context for approved plans. This PR was split from the local `master` branch on June 7, 2026. It covers server-side heartbeat and comment-wakeup behavior only. I searched GitHub for duplicate/related PRs; the results were broader heartbeat/run PRs, not this exact passive-comment and accepted-plan handoff change. ## What Changed - Filter runtime skill mention extraction so only UUID-like skill ids are looked up. - Stop ordinary issue comments and document annotation comments from waking the current assignee unless the comment reopens the issue. - Keep mention-targeted wakeups intact while removing passive assignee wakeups. - Include recent non-deleted issue comments in accepted-plan confirmation wake payloads and task markdown. - Updated focused server tests for the new wakeup and accepted-plan behavior. ## Verification - `git diff --check origin/master..HEAD` - `NODE_ENV=test pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-project-env.test.ts server/src/__tests__/document-annotation-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/issue-comment-reopen-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/issue-update-comment-wakeup-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-context-summary.test.ts server/src/__tests__/issue-comment-redaction.test.ts` - `NODE_ENV=test pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-accepted-plan-workspace-refresh.test.ts server/src/__tests__/issue-comment-redaction.test.ts server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-context-summary.test.ts` - `pnpm --filter /server typecheck` - PR checks green on head `a379a0264d384510ff8ac4a47fb1e44d7b556f68` - Greptile rerun green on head `a379a0264d384510ff8ac4a47fb1e44d7b556f68`: 9 files reviewed, 0 comments added, 0 unresolved review threads ## Risks - Medium behavioral risk: agents will no longer wake for passive comments unless mentioned or unless the comment reopens/resumes the issue. That is intentional, but any workflow relying on passive assignee comment wakeups should use explicit mentions or structured resume paths. - Low migration risk: no schema or migration changes. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex coding agent based on GPT-5, with shell, git, GitHub CLI, and local test execution. Exact hosted model variant and context-window size were not exposed by the runtime. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-06-07 06:24:48 -05:00
Aron Prins	8b85fdfa3c	fix(cli): send X-Paperclip-Run-Id so agents can mutate their issues via the CLI (#7642) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Agents act on issues through the `paperclipai` CLI as well as the HTTP API; the server gates agent-authenticated **mutations** of an in-progress issue (checkout, release, interactions, PATCH, attachment upload) behind the `X-Paperclip-Run-Id` header (`requireAgentRunId` / `assertAgentIssueMutationAllowed`). > - The CLI's HTTP client (`client/http.ts`) already supports sending that header, but `resolveCommandContext` never populated `runId`, so there was no way to provide it — every agent-authenticated mutation via the CLI failed with `401 Agent run id required`. > - Separately, `issue attachment:upload` hand-rolls its own multipart `fetch` (bypassing the JSON client), so it never forwarded the run-id at all, and its `inferContentTypeFromPath` couldn't produce `text/html` and appended `; charset=utf-8` to `md`/`txt` — which fails the server's exact-match content-type allowlist (`422 Unsupported attachment content type`). > - This PR lets the CLI send `X-Paperclip-Run-Id` from a new global `--run-id` flag (falling back to `$PAPERCLIP_RUN_ID`), and fixes `attachment:upload` to forward the run-id and emit server-allowed bare MIME types. > - The benefit is that an embodied agent can drive the full issue lifecycle (checkout → work → disposition → upload deliverable) entirely through the official CLI, instead of dropping to raw HTTP. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No issue exactly covers the CLI **send** side, so describing it here (bug path). Related: - `Refs #2063` — "Sub-agents cannot post comments on subtickets — Agent run id required" (same error string; that report focuses on the server gate, this PR fixes the CLI not sending the header for agent mutations). - `Refs #1199` — injects `X-Paperclip-Run-Id` on the **http adapter's** outbound request (server side). This PR is the complementary **CLI client** side. **Bug (per `bug_report.yml`):** - **What happened:** Running agent-authenticated CLI mutations (`issue checkout` / `issue update` on an in-progress issue / `issue attachment:upload`) returns `401 Agent run id required`, even with `--run-id`/`$PAPERCLIP_RUN_ID` set; `attachment:upload` of an HTML/markdown deliverable additionally returns `422 Unsupported attachment content type`. - **Expected:** The CLI forwards the agent run-id so the server authorizes the mutation, and uploads use a content-type the server accepts. - **Steps to reproduce:** As an agent token, `paperclipai issue checkout <id> --agent-id <id>` then `paperclipai issue update <id> --status done` (→ 401); `paperclipai issue attachment:upload <id> ./report.html` (→ 401, then 422 once run-id is wired). - **Deployment mode:** local_trusted (applies to all modes — server-side gate is mode-independent). ## What Changed - `cli/src/commands/client/common.ts`: resolve `runId` in `resolveCommandContext` from a new global `--run-id` flag, falling back to `$PAPERCLIP_RUN_ID`, so the existing HTTP client sends `X-Paperclip-Run-Id`; thread `runId` into the attachment-upload path; align `inferContentTypeFromPath` with the server's `DEFAULT_ALLOWED_TYPES` (add `html`/`htm`/`csv`/`zip`/`mp4`/`m4v`/`webm`/`mov`/`qt`, drop the `; charset` suffix). - `cli/src/commands/client/issue.ts`: pass `ctx.api.runId` into `uploadAttachment` and send the `X-Paperclip-Run-Id` header on the hand-rolled multipart request (matching what the JSON client injects automatically). - Tests: CLI asserts `attachment:upload` forwards `x-paperclip-run-id` + the inferred bare MIME type, and that `inferContentTypeFromPath` covers the allowed types; a server test locks the contract that an in-progress checkout owner without a run-id is rejected `401` on attachment upload. ## Verification ```bash # CLI tests (no DB) node_modules/.bin/vitest run \ cli/src/__tests__/common.test.ts \ cli/src/__tests__/issue-subresources.test.ts # → 2 files, 13 tests passed # Server contract test (embedded postgres) node_modules/.bin/vitest run \ server/src/__tests__/issue-agent-mutation-ownership-routes.test.ts # → 37 tests passed ``` Manual: with an agent token and a valid `$PAPERCLIP_RUN_ID`, `issue checkout` / `issue update --status done` / `issue attachment:upload ./report.html` now succeed where they previously returned 401/422. ## Risks Low. Additive only: - `--run-id` is a new optional flag; behavior is unchanged when it (and `$PAPERCLIP_RUN_ID`) are unset — the header is simply omitted as before. - The content-type map only **widens** the allowed set to match the server's existing allowlist and removes a suffix the server already rejected, so no previously-accepted upload changes type. - No schema/migration changes; no server behavior changes (the server test only documents the existing gate). ## Model Used Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context window), via Claude Code (tool use / agentic file edits + local test execution). Extended reasoning enabled. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots — N/A (CLI-only) - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green — pending CI run on this PR - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups — pending review - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-06-06 15:55:55 -07:00
Dotta	71a8464fee	[codex] prevent invalid agents from receiving assignments and runs (#7663) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - The control plane owns agent lifecycle, issue assignment, routine dispatch, heartbeat wakeups, and recovery paths > - Terminated, paused, pending-approval, or otherwise invalid agents should not receive new work or new execution attempts > - The old behavior left eligibility checks spread across routes and services, so assignment and run paths could drift apart > - This pull request centralizes agent lifecycle eligibility and applies it consistently to assignment, invocation, routines, recovery, and UI affordances > - The benefit is safer autonomy: terminated agents stay paused, invalid org-chain agents are surfaced, and active agents keep receiving valid work ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #5103 Related: #1864 Bug fix context: - What happened: agent assignment and heartbeat/run paths did not share one eligibility contract, so invalid lifecycle states could still be considered in some paths. - Expected behavior: terminated agents must never receive new assignments or heartbeat runs, and paused or otherwise invalid agents should be treated as non-invokable consistently. - Steps to reproduce: create or select an agent in an invalid lifecycle state, then attempt assignment, routine dispatch, or heartbeat/recovery wake paths. - Paperclip version/commit: fixed on top of `paperclipai/paperclip` `master` at the PR base. - Deployment mode: applies to the server control plane in local and authenticated deployments. ## What Changed - Added shared agent lifecycle eligibility helpers and exported the related shared types. - Centralized server-side assignability and invokability checks for issue assignment, agent routes, heartbeat dispatch, routines, recovery, and liveness logic. - Hardened issue assignment so invalid assignees are rejected instead of queued for work. - Hardened heartbeat/routine/recovery paths so terminated and otherwise invalid agents are not woken for new runs. - Updated board UI affordances to disable invalid agent actions and surface org-chain warnings where relevant. - Added targeted shared, server, and UI tests for the new eligibility behavior. ## Verification - `pnpm exec vitest run packages/shared/src/agent-eligibility.test.ts server/src/__tests__/agent-invokability.test.ts server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-archived-company-guard.test.ts server/src/__tests__/issue-liveness.test.ts server/src/__tests__/issues-service.test.ts server/src/__tests__/routines-service.test.ts ui/src/lib/company-members.test.ts ui/src/pages/Agents.test.tsx` — 8 files, 144 tests passed. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/shared typecheck && pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck && pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck` — passed. - Checked the PR diff does not include `pnpm-lock.yaml` or `.github/workflows` changes. - Checked `ROADMAP.md`; this is a targeted control-plane safety fix and does not duplicate a planned core feature. - Searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs/issues; closest related items are linked above. - CI and Greptile verification are pending on the opened PR and will be followed up before requesting merge. ## Risks Low to moderate risk. The intended behavioral shift is that invalid agents are refused earlier and more consistently, which could expose existing data with paused, pending, terminated, or broken org-chain assignees. The added tests cover the critical assignment, heartbeat, routine, recovery, shared helper, and UI paths. No database migrations are included. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-5 Codex via the Paperclip `codex_local` adapter, with shell/git/GitHub CLI tool use. Reasoning mode and context window are managed by the adapter runtime and not exposed in this environment. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots (not applicable: no design screenshots requested; UI behavior is covered by tests) - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes (not applicable: no user-facing command or schema docs changed) - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green (pending CI) - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups (pending Greptile) - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-06-06 12:45:57 -05:00
Dotta	e50666e4c8	[codex] Move maintainer task skills under .agents (#7658) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The skills layout separates runtime Paperclip skills in `skills/` from maintainer/agent workflow skills in `.agents/skills/`. > - Three maintainer workflow skills still lived under root `skills/`, making them look like runtime skills shipped through the Paperclip skill path. > - Root `skills/` is documented as reserved for Paperclip runtime skills, so these task-oriented maintainer skills belong with the other `.agents/skills` entries. > - This pull request moves the three requested skill packages, updates the direct smoke path, and adds regression coverage for the maintainer-only skill boundary. > - The benefit is a cleaner skills boundary without changing skill contents or runtime behavior. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Internal Paperclip issue: PAP-10471. No public GitHub issue exists for this repository-maintenance change. Inline feature/enhancement issue description follows the feature request template fields: ### Problem or motivation Root `skills/` is documented as reserved for Paperclip runtime skills, but `terminal-bench-loop`, `paperclip-create-plugin`, and `diagnose-why-work-stopped` lived there even though they are maintainer/agent workflow skills. ### Proposed solution Move those three skill packages to `.agents/skills/`, update the terminal-bench loop smoke script to read the new local path, and cover the moved skill names in the existing runtime-skill discovery test fixture. ### Alternatives considered Leaving the skills in root `skills/` would preserve direct old paths, but it keeps blurring the runtime-skill boundary. Moving them into the app-shipped skills catalog would be the wrong fit because these are maintainer workflow skills, not bundled company skills. ### Roadmap alignment This is a small maintenance cleanup around the existing Skills Manager/workflow-skill organization and does not introduce a roadmap-level core feature. ## What Changed - Moved `terminal-bench-loop`, `paperclip-create-plugin`, and `diagnose-why-work-stopped` into `.agents/skills/`. - Updated the terminal-bench loop smoke script and skill self-check text to use `.agents/skills/terminal-bench-loop/SKILL.md`. - Added regression coverage in `server/src/__tests__/paperclip-skill-utils.test.ts` that places these three skills under `.agents/skills` while asserting runtime discovery still lists only root runtime skills. ## Verification - `pnpm smoke:terminal-bench-loop-skill --source-issue-id "$PAPERCLIP_TASK_ID" --run-key PAP-10471-move-skill-path` - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/paperclip-skill-utils.test.ts` - `rg -n "skills/(terminal-bench-loop|paperclip-create-plugin|diagnose-why-work-stopped)" . --glob '!node_modules' --glob '!dist' --glob '!ui/dist'` returned no matches. ## Risks - Low risk: this is a file-location change plus direct path/test updates. - Maintainer agents that referenced the old root paths directly will need to use `.agents/skills/...` instead. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex, GPT-5 coding agent with shell/tool use. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge	2026-06-06 10:47:59 -05:00
Dotta	f09d4231e3	[codex] Add create-issue-interaction-ui maintainer skill (#7659) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Issue-thread interactions are one of the core ways agents pause for structured board or user decisions. > - Adding a new interaction kind currently requires coordinated changes across shared contracts, server behavior, UI cards, fixtures, CLI/MCP/plugin SDK helpers, and agent guidance. > - The checkbox-confirmation rollout established a good end-to-end pattern, but contributors needed a durable maintainer checklist for repeating that work. > - This pull request adds a developer/maintainer skill that captures that workflow inside the repo under `.agents/skills`. > - The benefit is a reusable implementation guide for future interaction-card work without installing that guidance on runtime Paperclip agents. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Paperclip issue: [PAP-10457](/PAP/issues/PAP-10457) This PR documents the process for adding a new issue-thread interaction family end-to-end. There is no GitHub issue for this Paperclip-internal skill addition. ## What Changed - Added `.agents/skills/create-issue-interaction-ui/SKILL.md` as a developer/maintainer skill. - Covered shared contract, server route/service behavior, UI card wiring, fixtures/Storybook, CLI/MCP/plugin SDK helpers, agent guidance, invariants, and focused verification. - Referenced the checkbox-confirmation rollout (`4d5322c82`, PR `#7649`) as the canonical worked example. ## Verification - `git diff --check origin/master..HEAD` - `NODE_ENV=test pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/paperclip-skill-utils.test.ts` - Reviewed the added skill markdown for scope, location, and workflow completeness. ## Risks Low risk. This is a documentation/skill-only change under `.agents/skills`; it does not change runtime code, database schema, API behavior, or installed production-agent guidance. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex coding agent based on GPT-5, with shell and GitHub CLI tool access. Exact hosted model variant and context-window size were not exposed by the runtime. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-06-06 10:47:34 -05:00
Dotta	d8e1004551	PAP-10440: group artifacts by task stacks (#7654) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The artifacts surface is where board users inspect files, media, and documents produced by agents. > - Grouped artifact stacks make that surface easier to scan by task, but the first pass still made grouping feel secondary to media filters. > - The follow-up request was to make grouping the default and give the grouping control the same icon-only outline treatment used on the issues page. > - This pull request keeps the existing artifact grouping API/UI, then polishes the artifacts toolbar state and Storybook review coverage. > - The benefit is that `/artifacts` now opens in the task-stack view by default while preserving explicit flat-mode filtering via `groupBy=none`. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public GitHub issue exists for this internal Paperclip task. ### Subsystem affected ui/ — React + Vite board UI. ### Problem or motivation The `/artifacts` grouping affordance was visually placed after the media filters, rendered as a text button, and defaulted to a flat artifact list. Internal follow-up `PAP-10465` requested the grouping icon move left of the filters, become an icon-only outlined button like `/issues`, and make Task grouping the default. ### Proposed solution Default `/artifacts` to grouped Task stacks, keep explicit flat mode available as `groupBy=none`, move the grouping control before the media chips, and restyle it as the shared icon-only outline button pattern. ### Alternatives considered Leaving flat mode as the implicit default was rejected because it does not satisfy the follow-up. Keeping a text label on the grouping trigger was rejected because `/issues` already established the icon-only outline pattern for this class of toolbar control. ### Roadmap alignment This aligns with the `Artifacts & Work Products` roadmap item by making generated outputs easier to inspect and operate from the board UI. ## What Changed - Defaulted the `/artifacts` page to `groupBy=task` when no grouping URL param is present, while keeping explicit flat mode available with `groupBy=none`. - Moved the group control before the media filter chips and changed it to an icon-only outlined button using the shared `Button` pattern. - Updated artifact page tests to cover default Task grouping, explicit flat mode, trigger ordering, and icon-only outline metadata. - Updated the artifact Storybook story so its toolbar mock matches the production ordering and grouped Task is documented as the default mode. ## Verification - `pnpm exec vitest run ui/src/pages/Artifacts.test.tsx ui/src/components/artifacts/ArtifactGroupCard.test.tsx` — passed. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck` — passed. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck` — passed. - `git diff --check` — passed. - QA visual validation from internal follow-up PAP-10466 passed desktop/mobile scenarios. Screenshot evidence attached there: - Desktop default: http://paperclip-dev:3100/api/attachments/bc81305d-f5de-485c-abeb-9e7c3d9d8539/content - Desktop toolbar close-up: http://paperclip-dev:3100/api/attachments/3375a62b-2110-48f3-bafa-ea98c00f99f7/content - Mobile default: http://paperclip-dev:3100/api/attachments/bfc5642e-9248-431e-9bac-36284dec1c89/content - Mobile toolbar close-up: http://paperclip-dev:3100/api/attachments/ca79401a-5ba8-464d-bc6e-aeffd47fe695/content - GitHub PR checks on head `431964c8b` — passed, including Greptile 5/5. ## Risks Low to medium risk. The main behavior shift is intentional: `/artifacts` now queries grouped Task stacks by default. Existing flat mode remains available through the grouping menu and explicit `groupBy=none` URLs. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-5.4 class coding model in this Paperclip heartbeat environment, with shell, git, test, and GitHub CLI tool use. Context window managed by the Codex runtime. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-06-06 10:22:47 -05:00
Dotta	2e74d32871	PAP-10430: split Issue-to-Task copy migration (#7651) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The board UI is the operator surface where users create, assign, monitor, and review work items. > - The product language is moving toward "tasks" for user-facing work items while the internal API and database still use "issues". > - PR #7543 bundled this copy migration with broader information-architecture work, which made the branch too large for Greptile review. > - This pull request peels the Issue-to-Task copy migration into a smaller, independently reviewable change. > - The benefit is clearer user-facing terminology, less agent confusion via the Paperclip skill note, and a smaller PR that Greptile can review. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #7645 Refs #7543 Refs PAP-10430 This PR was split out of #7543 so the Issue-to-Task copy migration can be reviewed separately and the remaining IA PR can fall under Greptile's file limit. ## What Changed - Preserves Scott Tong's original `PAP-57` copy-only commit, with author and co-author credit intact, to rename user-facing "Issues" copy to "Tasks" across the UI while keeping routes/API/internal symbols as `issue`. - Updates onboarding and release-smoke browser selectors from `Create & Open Issue` to `Create & Open Task`. - Adds a terminology note to `skills/paperclip/SKILL.md` clarifying that task and issue refer to the same Paperclip work item. - Resolves the only cherry-pick conflict by keeping current search artifacts support and changing visible search copy to "tasks". ## Verification - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui build` passed. - `NODE_ENV=test pnpm exec vitest run ui/src/components/IssuesList.test.tsx ui/src/components/Sidebar.test.tsx ui/src/components/NewIssueDialog.test.tsx ui/src/pages/IssueDetail.test.tsx` passed: 4 files, 66 tests. - `git diff --check origin/master...HEAD` passed. - Diff is 80 files, below Greptile's 100-file limit. - Before/after UI copy examples: "Issues" -> "Tasks", "New Issue" -> "New Task", "Create & Open Issue" -> "Create & Open Task". ## Risks - Medium copy-risk: this intentionally changes user-facing terminology broadly while keeping internal issue identifiers and routes unchanged. - Some docs and APIs still say `issue`; the skill note clarifies this so agents do not treat task and issue as separate entities. - Browser-level visual validation is expected from CI because this local container is missing usable browser dependencies. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used Scott Tong authored the original `PAP-57` copy migration, assisted by Claude Opus 4.8 and Paperclip agents per the preserved commit metadata. Codex / GPT-5-class coding agent with shell, GitHub CLI, and repository access performed the PR split, conflict resolution, skill note, and verification. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: scotttong <scott.tong@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-06-06 10:10:01 -05:00
Dotta	7428fb956f	[codex] Guard git-sensitive adapter workspaces (#7644) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The affected subsystem is the heartbeat execution path that turns issue assignment into adapter-backed work in a selected workspace. > - PAP-10409 and sibling follow-ups failed before useful adapter output because project/workspace identity became incoherent. > - A project-workspace-linked child issue could keep `projectWorkspaceId` / execution workspace state while losing `projectId`, then a git-sensitive local adapter could fall through toward an invalid fallback cwd. > - Paperclip needs to treat coherent workspace identity as part of the live-path contract, not only as post-failure cleanup. > - This pull request documents that rule, repairs issue inheritance, and blocks git-sensitive adapter launch before it can run from the wrong cwd. > - The benefit is a bounded recovery path: affected issues are repaired explicitly, future malformed workspaces fail fast with a clear recovery action, and the UI surfaces that reason. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #7646 Bug report fields: - Summary: adapter-backed follow-up issues can fail before doing work when issue creation/inheritance preserves workspace ids but drops project identity. - Affected issues: internal Paperclip issues PAP-10408 through PAP-10412, especially PAP-10409. - Steps to reproduce: create a project-scoped parent/follow-up tree where a child issue keeps `projectWorkspaceId` or an inherited execution workspace but has `projectId: null`, then launch a git-sensitive local adapter such as `codex_local`. - Expected behavior: Paperclip derives or preserves coherent project identity during issue creation, and heartbeat refuses malformed git-sensitive workspace launches with one clear recovery action. - Actual behavior before this PR: the run could reach adapter bootstrap with an incoherent workspace context and fail with git errors such as `fatal: not a git repository (or any parent up to mount point /srv)`. - Root cause: child/follow-up issue inheritance preserved workspace execution context without coherent project context. That let heartbeat workspace resolution/adapter launch reach a fallback cwd instead of refusing the malformed workspace state up front. ## What Changed - Documented the adapter workspace-coherence live-path precondition in `doc/execution-semantics.md`. - Updated issue creation/inheritance so workspace-inheriting issues preserve or derive project identity, while existing mismatch validation still rejects incoherent project/workspace combinations. - Added a heartbeat preflight guard for git-sensitive local adapters that validates effective cwd, persisted workspace identity, project workspace identity, and required git metadata before launch. - Added `workspace_validation` recovery actions for this failure class and ensured the source issue gets a visible, idempotent recovery comment. - Surfaced workspace-validation recovery state in issue rows, blocked notices, and recovery action cards, including the manual-repair wake policy label. - Added focused regression coverage for issue inheritance, all heartbeat workspace-validation guard branches, recovery display helpers, and UI recovery components. ## Verification - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-workspace-session.test.ts` - Result: 1 test file passed, 68 tests passed. - `pnpm exec vitest run ui/src/components/IssueRecoveryActionCard.test.tsx` - Result: 1 test file passed, 12 tests passed. - `pnpm exec vitest run ui/src/components/IssueBlockedNotice.test.tsx ui/src/components/IssueRecoveryActionCard.test.tsx` - Result: 2 test files passed, 18 tests passed. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck` - Result: passed. - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-plugin-environment.test.ts server/src/__tests__/issues-service.test.ts server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-workspace-session.test.ts server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-process-recovery.test.ts ui/src/components/IssueBlockedNotice.test.tsx ui/src/components/IssueRecoveryActionCard.test.tsx ui/src/lib/recovery-display.test.ts` - Result: 7 test files passed, 200 tests passed before the final guard-branch additions; the changed server file was re-run above. - UI coverage: `ui/storybook/stories/source-issue-recovery.stories.tsx` contains rendered scenarios for the generic recovery chip, workspace-validation recovery chip, blocked notice indicator, recovery action card, and issue-row chip. - Screenshot capture attempt: Storybook started successfully on `http://127.0.0.1:6016/`, but screenshots could not be captured in this runner because `agent-browser` launched an unusable Chrome binary and Playwright Chromium failed on missing system library `libatk-1.0.so.0`; the runner is non-root and lacks passwordless sudo for installing browser dependencies. - Hosted CI on final commit `969594e7` is green, including `verify`, `Build`, `Typecheck + Release Registry`, `General tests (server)`, workspace suites, serialized server suites, `Canary Dry Run`, and `e2e`. - Roadmap checked: no duplicate roadmap item; this is a tightly scoped reliability fix for existing heartbeat/workspace behavior. - Duplicate PR search checked: no open PR matched `workspace coherence adapter cwd`. ## Risks - Medium risk: heartbeat launch is stricter for git-sensitive local adapters and can now block malformed workspace states before adapter execution. - Mitigation: the guard is limited to local git-sensitive adapters and records a source-scoped recovery action with structured evidence instead of retrying indefinitely. - Compatibility: valid project/workspace execution paths continue normally; explicit project/workspace mismatches remain rejected. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-5-based `codex_local` coding agent with terminal/tool use. Work was produced through Paperclip issue execution with focused local test runs. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [ ] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-06-06 09:39:26 -05:00
scotttong	eaef47f4c7	Information Architecture + project/agent visual refresh (experimental) (#7543) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The board UI is the control surface for issues, projects, agents, goals, workspaces, and operator settings. > - The existing navigation and list surfaces make several high-frequency workflows feel harder to scan than they should, especially around projects and agents. > - The product direction is to improve those surfaces without breaking the existing route model or forcing a new IA on every operator at once. > - This pull request now keeps the dependent IA, project identity, and agent-list visual refresh work together while the Issue-to-Task copy migration is split into #7651. > - The benefit is a clearer left nav, better project identity, denser agent/project list rows, and brand-aligned status treatment while preserving the classic default experience behind a flag. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #7645 Refs #7651 Internal planning/work references: PAP-53, PAP-56, PAP-58, PAP-59, PAP-60, PAP-61, PAP-68, PAP-69, PAP-70, PAP-71, PAP-72, PAP-75, PAP-76, PAP-80, PAP-85, PAP-86, PAP-87, PAP-88, PAP-89. ## What Changed - Adds `enableStreamlinedLeftNavigation`, defaulting off, and gates sidebar presentation so classic navigation remains the default. - Adds project icon persistence, validation, portability, picker UI, and `ProjectTile` rendering while defaulting new projects to neutral gray. - Adds projects-list task-count and budget summary data with focused server/shared/UI coverage. - Refreshes agent list rows, row actions, active/recent sidebar behavior, and status capsule/chip styling for the approved brand state system. - Removes the placeholder Conference room and Artifacts nav/routes from the finalized experimental nav direction. - Removes `pnpm-lock.yaml` and the Issue-to-Task copy migration from this PR diff; the copy migration now lives in #7651. ## Verification - Existing branch verification from the authored commits: UI typecheck, targeted unit tests, and light/dark visual checks for `/agents`, agent detail, and design-guide status states. - Maintainer cleanup verification on `75e34e5`: `git diff --check origin/master...HEAD` passed, the `design/` diff is empty, and the PR diff is 61 files, below Greptile's 100-file review limit. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui build` passed. - `NODE_ENV=test pnpm exec vitest run ui/src/components/Sidebar.test.tsx` passed: 1 file, 8 tests. - CI and Greptile should rerun on the latest push. ## Risks - Broad UI surface area: the experimental flag keeps the classic nav default, but changed shared components such as `EntityRow`, `ProjectTile`, and agent status badges could affect multiple pages. - Database migration: `projects.icon` is additive and nullable, but migration ordering and portability import/export must stay aligned. - The Issue-to-Task copy migration is now separated into #7651, so reviewers should evaluate this PR as IA/project/agent presentation work only. - Visual regressions are possible across smaller widths because the PR intentionally changes dense list-row layouts. ## Model Used Claude Opus 4.8 assisted the original feature commits. Paperclip-Paperclip agents assisted some planning/design commits. Codex / GPT-5-class coding agent with shell, GitHub CLI, and repository access performed this PR-readiness cleanup and split. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> Co-authored-by: Dotta <bippadotta@protonmail.com>	2026-06-06 09:17:27 -05:00
Dotta	4d5322c821	[codex] Add checkbox confirmation issue interactions (#7649) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Agent work is coordinated through issues, comments, interactions, and approval-style handoffs. > - Existing issue-thread interactions could ask questions, suggest tasks, and request confirmation, but they did not support a structured checkbox confirmation payload for choosing one or more options. > - That gap made board/user confirmations harder to validate consistently across API callers, plugin helpers, CLI tooling, and the UI. > - This pull request adds the shared checkbox confirmation contract, server handling, client helpers, and issue-thread UI needed to render and submit structured selections. > - The benefit is that agents can request bounded multi-select confirmations in the same audited issue-thread flow as other Paperclip interactions. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description - No public GitHub issue found for this exact branch. Internal Paperclip issue: PAP-10415 / PAP-10441 requested creating this PR for the checkbox confirmation issue-thread UI component work. - GitHub duplicate search performed for checkbox confirmation / issue-thread interaction PRs; no matching open PR was found. - Related issue search result `#7497` was unrelated company file cleanup work, so it is not linked as a related issue. ## What Changed - Added shared types, validators, constants, and tests for `request_checkbox_confirmation` interactions. - Extended server issue-thread interaction service and routes for checkbox confirmation creation, validation, expiration, and response handling. - Added CLI, MCP, and plugin SDK helper coverage so external callers can create the new interaction shape consistently. - Updated the issue-thread interaction UI to render checkbox confirmations with min/max bounds, selection summaries, stale-target states, and accept/decline flows. - Documented the checkbox confirmation interaction contract in the Paperclip skill/API reference. ## Verification - Rebased cleanly on `paperclipai/paperclip` `master` fetched into `public-gh/master` at `a4fa0eaf5`. - Confirmed the PR diff does not include `pnpm-lock.yaml` or `.github/workflows` changes. - Ran focused tests with `NODE_ENV=test`: ```sh NODE_ENV=test pnpm run preflight:workspace-links NODE_ENV=test pnpm exec vitest run packages/shared/src/issue-thread-interactions.test.ts server/src/__tests__/issue-thread-interaction-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/issue-thread-interactions-service.test.ts ui/src/components/IssueThreadInteractionCard.test.tsx ui/src/lib/issue-thread-interactions.test.ts cli/src/__tests__/issue-subresources.test.ts cli/src/__tests__/project-goal.test.ts packages/mcp-server/src/tools.test.ts packages/plugins/sdk/tests/testing-actions.test.ts ``` Result: 8 test files passed, 78 tests passed. - CI on latest head `63b9e55` is green. - Greptile Review passed on latest head; GraphQL review-thread check shows all Greptile threads resolved. ## Risks - Medium surface area because the interaction contract touches shared validators, server routes/services, UI rendering, CLI, MCP, plugin SDK helpers, and docs. - No database migrations are included. - `pnpm-lock.yaml` is intentionally excluded per repository lockfile policy. - UI screenshots are not attached because the task explicitly requested not to add design screenshots or images unless they were part of the work; component tests cover the new rendering and interaction states. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex coding agent based on GPT-5, with repository file access, shell command execution, git/GitHub CLI tooling, and Paperclip control-plane API access. Exact hosted model ID/context-window metadata is not exposed inside this runtime. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [ ] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-06-06 08:48:43 -05:00
Devin Foley	20aea356cc	refactor(deps-dev): bump vitest from 3.2.4 to 4.1.8 (#7581) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies > - Test infrastructure across server, ui, packages/* runs on Vitest > - Dependabot opened a narrow bump (3.2.4 → 3.2.6), but the wider workspace is on 3.2.4 and the major-version bridge to v4 needs a coordinated change set across configs and tests > - Staying on 3.x indefinitely leaves us behind on Vitest 4 (perf, pool, and config improvements) and forces repeated patch-only dependabot churn > - This pull request upgrades Vitest to 4.1.8 across the workspace, updates `server/vitest.config.ts` and `scripts/run-vitest-stable.mjs` for the new API, and adjusts two UI tests for the new assertion semantics > - The benefit is a single, coherent Vitest 4 upgrade that supersedes #7570 and gets us on the supported major line ## What Changed - Bump `vitest` from `3.2.4` to `4.1.8` across root, `server`, `ui`, and all `packages/*` (including plugin examples and sandbox providers) - Update `server/vitest.config.ts` for Vitest 4 config surface - Update `scripts/run-vitest-stable.mjs` to match the new runner behavior - Adjust `ui/src/components/CommentThread.test.tsx` and `ui/src/components/MarkdownEditor.test.tsx` for Vitest 4 matcher/timing semantics - Refresh `pnpm-lock.yaml` ## Verification - `pnpm install` resolves cleanly with the new lockfile - `pnpm -w -r test` (server, ui, packages) runs under Vitest 4.1.8 ## Risks - Major-version Vitest bump: behavioral changes in pools, fake timers, and matcher strictness can surface flake. Test config and the two UI tests were updated to match v4 semantics; broader test runs should be watched on CI before merge. - Supersedes dependabot PR #7570 (3.2.4 → 3.2.6); that PR should be closed. ## Model Used - Claude (Anthropic) — `claude-opus-4-7`, extended thinking, tool use enabled ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass - [ ] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [ ] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [ ] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Closes #7570	2026-06-05 21:11:32 -07:00
Dotta	4693d770aa	Add company artifacts page (#7621) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Operators need a way to inspect files and work products created by agents across a company without opening each issue one by one. > - The existing issue detail surfaces already show attachments and outputs, but there was no company-level artifacts index or search-result affordance for artifact-like records. > - The backend needed a company-scoped artifacts projection API that preserves issue/run attribution and safe links back to source records. > - The UI needed a first-class Artifacts page, sidebar entry, reusable artifact cards, and deep-link handling that keeps company prefixes intact. > - This pull request adds the company artifacts API and page, then wires artifacts into search and issue output surfaces. > - The benefit is a single place to browse, filter, and open generated work products and attachments while preserving company boundaries. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Fixes #7622. Feature request fields: - Problem/motivation: company operators need a consolidated artifacts surface for attachments and work products produced by agents. - Proposed solution: add a company-scoped artifacts projection endpoint, a board Artifacts route, reusable cards, sidebar navigation, and artifact search integration. - Alternatives considered: keep artifact discovery only on individual issue pages; that forces operators to know the source issue before finding generated outputs. - Roadmap alignment: checked `ROADMAP.md`; this is a focused board UI/API improvement and does not duplicate a listed roadmap item. ## What Changed - Added shared artifact types and validators. - Added a company-scoped artifact projection service/API with tests for attachment/work-product attribution. - Added Artifacts board UI route, API client, sidebar link, cards, filters, and storybook coverage. - Added artifact result handling to company search and issue output/deep-link flows. - Rebased the branch onto the latest `public-gh/master` state and resolved the route-test conflict by preserving both upstream team-catalog coverage and artifact route coverage. - Fixed a local Sidebar test helper so it no longer depends on a runtime-undefined `React.act` export in this dependency install. ## Verification - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui exec vitest run src/components/artifacts/ArtifactCard.test.tsx src/api/artifacts.test.ts src/lib/company-routes.test.ts` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui exec vitest run src/pages/Artifacts.test.tsx src/pages/Search.test.tsx src/components/Sidebar.test.tsx` - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/company-artifacts-service.test.ts server/src/__tests__/company-search-service.test.ts server/src/__tests__/company-search-rate-limit-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/issue-agent-mutation-ownership-routes.test.ts` - Confirmed the PR diff does not include `pnpm-lock.yaml` or `.github/workflows/*`. - Duplicate search: no open PRs or issues found for `artifact page ArtifactCard` in `paperclipai/paperclip`. Screenshots are intentionally omitted per the internal task instruction not to add design screenshots or images to this PR unless they are specifically part of the work. I also attempted browser capture in this runner, but `agent-browser` failed to launch Chrome and Playwright Chromium is missing `libatk-1.0.so.0`. ## Risks - Low-to-medium risk: this adds a new API projection and UI surface, so attribution/link regressions could affect artifact navigation. - Company scoping is covered in the new service/API tests. - No database migrations are included. - No lockfile or workflow changes are included. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-5 coding agent with tool use and local command execution. Exact hosted model identifier is not exposed in this runtime. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [ ] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots (intentionally omitted per task instruction; browser capture unavailable in this runner) - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-06-05 18:11:05 -05:00
Dotta	dbebf30c89	Add low-trust review containment (#7530) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is a control plane for AI-agent companies, so execution policy and trust boundaries are part of the product's safety contract. > - Low-trust review work needs narrower authority than normal same-company agents because hostile PRs, comments, attachments, and generated output can carry prompt-injection payloads. > - The current V1 shape gives trusted workers broad company context, which is useful for normal execution but too permissive for a reviewer assigned to hostile content. > - This branch adds a `low_trust_review` preset, source-trust tagging, route-level containment, and quarantine handling so low-trust output does not automatically flow into higher-trust wake context. > - The branch has been rebased onto current `origin/master`, and the low-trust migration was renumbered to `0097_low_trust_source_trust.sql` to avoid collisions with existing `0091` through `0096` migrations. > - Greptile feedback was addressed by tightening low-trust detection, preserving project-level trust policy checks, fixing issue-kind promotion lookup, removing duplicate post-lease isolation assertion, documenting fail-closed source-trust behavior, bounding ancestry checks, enforcing runtime issue context for CEOs, awaiting accepted-plan monitor authorization, and making low-trust issue source-trust tagging atomic. > - The benefit is a first production slice of deny-by-default review containment with regression coverage for the main control-plane pivot surfaces. Fixes #7531. ## What Changed - Added shared trust-policy types and validators, plus database/source-trust fields for issues, comments, documents, and work products. - Implemented server enforcement for low-trust issue scope, agent self-view redaction, secret/plugin/runtime denial paths, promotion checks, and quarantined continuation/wake context. - Added focused low-trust regression tests for resolver behavior, source trust, route authorization, heartbeat preflight ordering, runtime containment, and quarantine redaction. - Added board UI affordances for selecting/reviewing the low-trust preset and surfacing source-trust badges in relevant issue views. - Added `doc/LOW-TRUST-PRESETS.md`, updated `doc/SPEC-implementation.md`, and committed the low-trust review contract plan under `doc/plans/`. - Rebasing note: the original `0097_low_trust_source_trust.sql` migration was renamed to `0097_low_trust_source_trust.sql`; the SQL uses `ADD COLUMN IF NOT EXISTS` so users who already applied the old-numbered migration are not broken by the renumbered migration. ## Verification - Rebased branch onto current `origin/master` and force-pushed with lease to `origin/PAP-10211-low-trust-agent` at head `2719f31e3`. - Confirmed the PR diff does not include `pnpm-lock.yaml` or `.github/workflows` changes. - Resolved upstream UI/comment conflicts by preserving deleted-comment tombstone behavior and low-trust source-trust badges/metadata. - Renumbered the low-trust source-trust migration to `0097_low_trust_source_trust.sql`; the SQL uses `ADD COLUMN IF NOT EXISTS` so users who already applied an old-numbered copy are not broken. - `pnpm exec vitest run ui/src/lib/issue-chat-messages.test.ts server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-workspace-session.test.ts` - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/source-trust.test.ts server/src/__tests__/workspace-runtime-service-authz.test.ts ui/src/lib/trust-policy-ui.test.ts ui/src/components/TrustPresetSection.test.tsx` - `pnpm run typecheck:build-gaps` - `git diff --check` - GitHub checks pass on head `2719f31e3`: build, typecheck/release registry, general tests, serialized server suites, e2e, canary, verify, policy/review, Socket, and Snyk. - Greptile Review passes with Confidence Score 5/5 and zero unresolved Greptile review threads. - No design screenshots/images were added because the task explicitly says not to add them unless they are specifically part of the work. ## Risks - Medium risk: this touches shared trust-policy contracts, server authorization paths, heartbeat context generation, migration metadata, and UI preset controls. - Low-trust containment is intentionally deny-by-default; legitimate future review workflows may need explicit allowlisted exceptions. - Plugin/runtime/security surfaces are broad, so regression tests cover the current known routes but future integrations must route through the same containment layer. - The PR is ready for review; GitHub checks are green and Greptile is 5/5. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex, GPT-5 coding agent, tool-enabled shell and GitHub CLI workflow. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] UI changes are covered by focused tests; no screenshots were added per task instruction not to add design images unless specifically required - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-06-05 16:48:02 -05:00
Dotta	fff3832a01	[codex] Add teams catalog extraction (#7550) ... Fixes #7551 ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the control plane for AI-agent companies, and reusable company/team setup is part of making those companies faster to launch. > - The teams catalog work introduces app-shipped team templates that can be browsed, previewed, and installed into a company. > - Catalog installation crosses several contracts: bundled package contents, shared API types, server import/install behavior, CLI workflows, and the board UI. > - Agents also need a safe path through catalog installs: scoped company selection, explicit source policy, approval fallback for agent creation, and preserved catalog provenance. > - This pull request extracts the completed teams catalog branch into one reviewable PR on top of `public-gh/master`. > - The benefit is a reusable teams catalog foundation with server, CLI, package, docs, and hidden UI surfaces kept in sync. ## What Changed - Added the `@paperclipai/teams-catalog` package with bundled/optional team definitions, generated manifest, validators, catalog builder tests, and migration notes. - Added shared teams catalog types/validators plus server routes and services for listing, previewing, and installing catalog teams. - Integrated catalog install with company portability, skill/source policy checks, provenance metadata, origin hashes, target-manager reparenting, and installed/out-of-date detection. - Added CLI `teams` commands and agent-safe company selection behavior, including `company current` and approval fallback for forbidden agent-run installs. - Added hidden Team Catalog UI/API/query surfaces, Storybook fixtures, and targeted UI tests while keeping the UI route out of primary navigation. - Added docs for CLI/company/teams catalog behavior and removed generated screenshot artifacts from the PR diff. ## Verification - `pnpm exec vitest run cli/src/__tests__/company.test.ts cli/src/__tests__/teams.test.ts packages/teams-catalog/src/catalog-builder.test.ts packages/teams-catalog/src/shipped-catalog.test.ts server/src/__tests__/agent-permissions-service.test.ts server/src/__tests__/company-portability.test.ts server/src/__tests__/company-skills-service.test.ts server/src/__tests__/teams-catalog-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/teams-catalog-service.test.ts server/src/__tests__/teams-catalog-install-no-overrides.test.ts ui/src/lib/company-routes.test.ts ui/src/pages/TeamCard.test.tsx ui/src/pages/TeamCatalog.test.tsx ui/src/pages/useInstallTeamCatalogEntry.test.tsx` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/shared typecheck && pnpm --filter @paperclipai/teams-catalog typecheck && pnpm --filter paperclipai typecheck && pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck && pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck` - Confirmed branch is rebased onto `public-gh/master` (`78dc3625a`) and `public-gh/master` is an ancestor of `HEAD`. - Confirmed PR diff excludes `pnpm-lock.yaml`, `.github/workflows/*`, generated screenshot images, and screenshot helper scripts. ## Risks - Medium review surface: this crosses package generation, shared contracts, server install behavior, CLI, docs, and hidden UI code. - Catalog install behavior creates agents/projects/tasks/skills and must keep company scoping, permissions, source policy, and provenance checks strict. - `pnpm-lock.yaml` is intentionally excluded per repo policy; CI/default-branch automation owns lockfile refresh. - The Team Catalog UI is included but hidden from primary navigation, so future enablement should re-check visual QA before exposure. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. > > ROADMAP checked: this aligns with reusable companies/templates and plugin-adjacent onboarding work. This PR packages work already developed on the Paperclip task branch for review. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex, GPT-5 series coding agent in this Paperclip session; exact runtime context window was not exposed. Used shell, git, `gh`, and local test/typecheck tooling. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots, or documented why screenshots are intentionally omitted - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-06-05 12:55:49 -05:00
Dotta	3657854e5e	Merge pull request #7554 from paperclipai/codex/pap-10343-comment-redaction ... [codex] Redact deleted issue comments	2026-06-05 05:32:08 -10:00
Dotta	487361a5cc	Merge pull request #7553 from paperclipai/codex/pap-10343-operator-qol-pr ... [codex] Group operator QoL fixes	2026-06-05 05:29:56 -10:00
m.seomoon	fb28cf38b4	fix(heartbeat): guard Hermes resume session state (#7516) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is a control plane for AI-agent companies > - Heartbeats reuse adapter session state so agents can continue work across wakeups > - Hermes can only resume from full canonical session IDs, not truncated display IDs > - #6347 exposed a case where Paperclip could save invalid Hermes output like `from`, or a shortened display ID, as resumable state > - This pull request hardens the host-side Hermes resume path so Paperclip only stores and reuses session IDs that can actually resume > - The benefit is that Hermes wakeups no longer get stuck retrying bad saved resume state ## What Changed - Added Hermes-only validation for canonical session IDs in `server/src/services/heartbeat.ts`. - Stopped building Hermes resume params from truncated display IDs such as `20260601_141558_`. - For explicit resume-from-run wakeups, pulls the full Hermes session ID from the run result payload after validation. - Preserves the previous valid Hermes session state when a run fails, times out, or is cancelled instead of replacing it with invalid adapter output like `from`. - Clears existing Hermes resume state that fails validation. - Leaves non-Hermes adapter session behavior unchanged. - Added regression coverage in `server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-workspace-session.test.ts`. Addresses #6347. Supersedes #6351 and covers the full-session resume metadata handoff from #7280. ## Verification - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server exec vitest run src/__tests__/heartbeat-workspace-session.test.ts` — passed, 50 tests. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck` — passed. - `pnpm -r typecheck` — passed. - `pnpm build` — passed. - `git diff --check` — clean. Full suite did not finish green locally; the failures were outside this server-only heartbeat path: - `pnpm test:run`: - `@paperclipai/adapter-opencode-local` remote SSH tests timed out. - `ui/src/pages/Inbox.test.tsx` failed once in `Inbox toolbar > syncs hover with j/k selection on inbox rows`; the direct file rerun passed. - `ui/src/components/IssueDocumentAnnotations.test.tsx` failed once in `auto-opens the panel and focuses the thread when deep-linked`; the direct file rerun passed. ## Risks - Low risk: no schema, public API, shared contract, or UI changes. - If Hermes changes its canonical session ID format, the validation regex will need to be updated. - Adapter-side parsing still needs its own fix; this PR prevents non-resumable adapter output from becoming durable Paperclip resume state. - This does not add an immediate same-run retry after `Session not found`; recovery happens by clearing or preserving durable resume state for later wakeups. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI GPT-5.5 (`openai/gpt-5.5`) via opencode, with repository read/search tools and local shell/test execution. opencode did not expose context-window or reasoning-mode details. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used, including exact model ID and capability details - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have run tests locally — targeted checks passed; full `pnpm test:run` had unrelated local failures disclosed above - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots — N/A, no UI changes - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes — N/A, no user-facing docs or commands changed - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge	2026-06-04 22:45:25 -07:00
Dotta	9aa065a38c	Make deleted-comment cleanup atomic ... Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-06-05 03:56:39 +00:00
Dotta	1afa337841	Address Greptile deleted-comment feedback ... Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-06-05 03:43:12 +00:00
Dotta	af0c43b205	Address operator QoL review feedback	2026-06-05 03:40:46 +00:00
Dotta	5f481d50f1	Allow inline video attachment previews ... Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-06-05 03:28:07 +00:00
Dotta	39e0fba65f	Filter issues by plan document	2026-06-05 03:28:07 +00:00
Dotta	4afe5ab7cb	Add other answers to issue questions	2026-06-05 03:28:07 +00:00
Dotta	f360fcbbb3	Expire confirmations after user comments ... Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-06-05 03:28:07 +00:00
Dotta	17fa6fe0fe	Add deleted comment regression coverage	2026-06-05 03:20:46 +00:00
Dotta	7f70759e61	Redact deleted issue comments	2026-06-05 03:20:46 +00:00
Dotta	0cca059705	Address catalog review cleanup ... Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-06-04 21:10:29 +00:00
Dotta	bee2b25f5d	Add referenced last30days catalog entry	2026-06-04 20:01:25 +00:00
Aron Prins	1227bb8ead	Improve OpenAPI spec coverage and auth metadata (#4579) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies > - Its REST API is the control-plane contract for the board UI, agents, plugins, and external integrations > - This branch adds `/api/openapi.json`, which makes the generated OpenAPI document part of that contract instead of an internal implementation detail > - Once the spec is published, it has to match the mounted Express routes, auth model, and real HTTP behavior closely enough for client generation and review > - The existing spec drifted from the live server: it missed mounted routes, documented a few nonexistent ones, omitted auth semantics, and normalized response codes too aggressively > - This pull request makes the generated spec track the real API surface, exposes security requirements, and adds regression coverage so drift is caught automatically > - The benefit is that Paperclip's published API description becomes trustworthy for integrators, SDK generation, and review without changing runtime auth enforcement ## What Changed - Added the OpenAPI endpoint wiring under `server/src/routes/openapi.ts` so `/api/openapi.json` is generated from the current route-backed OpenAPI builder. - Replaced generic request/response bodies with typed schemas where available so the generated document carries useful structure instead of opaque blobs. - Expanded the generated spec to cover the mounted route set, including access/member flows, CLI auth challenge routes, invite acceptance, issue thread interaction routes, adapter environment testing, budget policy routes, resource memberships, secret provider routes, cloud upstream routes, and `/api/openapi.json` itself. - Corrected documented path mismatches such as `skills/scan` vs `skills/scan-projects`, and other route-name/path drift. - Added security schemes plus operation-level security metadata so public, authenticated, board-only, and instance-admin endpoints are distinguishable in the generated contract. - Fixed reviewed response-code mismatches for create/accept flows and authz failures, including `201`, `202`, and `403` cases that were previously flattened away. - Added `server/src/__tests__/openapi-routes.test.ts` to diff the generated spec against mounted server routes and assert key auth/response invariants. - Hardened the route-drift test after review feedback: it now handles single/double/template route literals, fails on unlisted route files that declare router methods, and filters OpenAPI path-item keys to HTTP methods only. ## Verification - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/openapi-routes.test.ts` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui exec vitest run src/pages/Inbox.test.tsx` - `pnpm -r typecheck` - `pnpm test:run` - `pnpm build` Manual notes: - Confirmed the generated spec now matches the mounted route set in the focused regression test. - Confirmed `/api/plugins/install` is marked privileged in the generated security metadata. - Confirmed `POST /api/invites/{token}/accept` documents `202`. - Addressed the Greptile route coverage comments and reran the focused OpenAPI test, typecheck, and build successfully. ## Risks - Medium-low risk. The main risk is ongoing spec drift if new routes are added without updating the OpenAPI builder, but the regression test now fails on unknown route files that declare router methods. - The auth metadata is descriptive only; it does not change runtime enforcement. If reviewers assume this PR hardens server auth behavior, that would be an incorrect expectation. - This change increases the amount of hand-maintained OpenAPI mapping in `server/src/routes/openapi.ts`, so future API additions still need discipline. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex, GPT-5-based coding agent in Codex desktop. Exact internal model variant/version and context-window size are not exposed in this environment. Tool-enabled coding workflow with terminal execution, git, and GitHub integration. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots or confirmed screenshots are not applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-06-04 09:59:22 -07:00
Doyeon Baek	d60f50e4a4	feat(routines): suppress scheduled ticks while project is paused (TON-2139) (#7502) ... Fixes #7501 ## Thinking Path Issue checkout already rejects paused projects (`issues.ts` → 409), but that fires only *after* the routine execution issue exists. Per internal TON-1102, the pause must be honored earlier — at the scheduler tick — so no execution issue is ever created while a project is paused. The fix gates dispatch in `tickScheduledTriggers` on the due routine's `projects.pausedAt`, while preserving normal cron advancement so resume does not backfill missed firings. ## What Changed - `server/src/services/routines.ts`: - `tickScheduledTriggers` LEFT JOINs `projects` and derives `projectPaused` from `projects.pausedAt`. Routines with no project are never suppressed. - When paused: the tick is still claimed and `routineTriggers.nextRunAt` advances by a single cron step (catch-up backfill bypassed while paused — no replay on resume); `recordSuppressedScheduleRun` runs instead of `dispatchRoutineRun`. - New `recordSuppressedScheduleRun` inserts one `routine_runs` row (`source: schedule`, `status: skipped`, `failureReason: paused`, `linkedIssueId: null`, `completedAt` set), updates routine/trigger touched state, and logs a `routine.run_skipped` activity entry. - `nextResultText` gains a `skipped_paused` branch for pause-specific audit text (does not overload the live-issue `skipped` text). - `server/src/__tests__/routines-service.test.ts`: focused test proving all four acceptance criteria (no issue created while paused; one `skipped`/`paused`/null-link run; `nextRunAt` advanced; normal resume on a later unpaused tick). ## Verification ```bash pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server exec tsc --noEmit npx vitest run server/src/__tests__/routines-service.test.ts ``` - The focused test in `routines-service.test.ts` proves all four acceptance criteria: no execution issue is created while the project is paused; exactly one `routine_runs` row is written with `source: schedule` / `status: skipped` / `failureReason: paused` / `linkedIssueId: null`; the trigger's `nextRunAt` advances by a single cron step (missed firings are not backfilled); and a later tick after the project is unpaused dispatches normally. ## Risks - Catch-up backfill is intentionally bypassed while paused — missed firings are **not** replayed on resume (specified no-backfill behavior). - Scope is deliberately narrow: manual runs, webhook/API triggers, routine-level paused status, workspace runtime start/stop, `concurrencyPolicy`, and `catchUpPolicy` (beyond no-backfill) are untouched. ## Model Used claude-opus-4-8 (Paperclip CTO heartbeat) Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-06-04 08:28:26 -07:00
Devin Foley	244a5b8002	fix(plugins): allow agent JWTs to access plugin tool endpoints (supersedes #3272, with regression tests from #5549) (#7480) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies > - Plugin tools are how agents call into plugin-contributed capabilities (`GET /api/plugins/tools`, `POST /api/plugins/tools/execute`) > - Those two routes previously required board-level authentication, so agent-issued JWTs were rejected — agents couldn't actually use the very tools the plugin system was built to expose to them > - Two community PRs (#3272 by @nullEFFORT and #5549 by @aperim-agent) independently fixed this, but both went stale against master and neither could be merged as-is > - This pull request lands #3272's authz-helper approach (`assertBoardOrAgent`) rebased on current master, and adds the regression test suite from #5549 adapted to #3272's symbol names > - The benefit is agents can finally call plugin tools while preserving the existing board-scoped checks for the rest of the plugin admin surface ## What Changed - Adds `assertBoardOrAgent(req)` helper in `server/src/routes/authz.ts` — accepts either a board user or an agent JWT - Applies `assertBoardOrAgent` (in place of `assertBoard`) on `GET /api/plugins/tools` and `POST /api/plugins/tools/execute` so agent-issued tokens can list and execute plugin tools - Updates the file-level doc comment on `server/src/routes/plugins.ts` to note the agent-accessible routes - Adds `server/src/__tests__/plugin-routes-authz.test.ts` (118 lines, 34 cases) covering: agent JWT can list tools, agent JWT can execute within its company scope, agent JWT is rejected when `runContext.companyId` is outside its authenticated scope, agent JWT is rejected when `runContext.agentId` does not belong to `runContext.companyId`, plus the existing board/admin paths ## Verification - \`pnpm vitest run server/src/__tests__/plugin-routes-authz.test.ts\` → **34/34 passing** locally - Diff vs master is exactly 3 files: \`authz.ts\` (+6), \`plugins.ts\` (+5/-3), \`plugin-routes-authz.test.ts\` (+118). No other surfaces touched. ## Risks Low risk. - Authorization is being *widened* on two specific routes (board → board or agent), not narrowed elsewhere. Every other plugin admin route still uses \`assertBoard\` / \`assertInstanceAdmin\` / \`assertBoardOrgAccess\`. - Agent JWTs already encode \`companyId\` and \`agentId\`; the existing \`validateToolRunContextScope\` queue still enforces that an agent cannot execute a tool against a different company or impersonate another agent. Regression coverage for both is included. - No schema, migration, or wire-protocol changes. ## Model Used - Claude (Anthropic), \`claude-opus-4-7\` via Claude Code, extended thinking enabled, tool use enabled. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [ ] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots — N/A, server-only change - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes (file-level doc comment on \`plugins.ts\`) - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge ## Provenance / credit This PR supersedes two community PRs that addressed the same agent-JWT plugin-tools authz gap: - **#3272 by @nullEFFORT** — original \`assertBoardOrAgent\` helper and the two route changes. \`fix: allow agent JWTs to access plugin tool endpoints\` (commit \`6991380\`) is cherry-picked here with author attribution preserved. - **#5549 by @aperim-agent** — regression test suite. Adapted to #3272's symbol names (\`assertBoardOrAgent\`, three-row \`validateToolRunContextScope\` queue) and included here. Both originals went stale against master and could not be force-pushed to the contributor forks from our OAuth-app-scoped tooling (workflow files in our \`master\` introduce a \`workflow\` scope requirement on pushes to those forks). This PR ships the same fix from our own branch so we can land it without that blocker. --------- Co-authored-by: Chad <chad@nulleffort.com> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-06-04 00:05:02 -07:00
dependabot[bot]	06ce7ec5b0	build(deps): bump dompurify from 3.3.2 to 3.4.8 (#7326) ... Bumps [dompurify](https://github.com/cure53/DOMPurify) from 3.3.2 to 3.4.8. <details> <summary>Release notes</summary> <p><em>Sourced from <a href="https://github.com/cure53/DOMPurify/releases">dompurify's releases</a>.</em></p> <blockquote> <h2>DOMPurify 3.4.8</h2> <ul> <li>Cleaned up the repository root, renamed some and removed unneeded files</li> <li>Fixed an issue with handling of Trusted Types policies, thanks <a href="https://github.com/fulstadev"><code>@​fulstadev</code></a></li> <li>Fixed the node iterator for better template scrubbing, thanks <a href="https://github.com/IamLeandrooooo"><code>@​IamLeandrooooo</code></a></li> <li>Included formerly missing LICENSE-MPL in published npm package, thanks <a href="https://github.com/asamuzaK"><code>@​asamuzaK</code></a></li> <li>Bumped several dependencies where possible</li> </ul> <h2>DOMPurify 3.4.7</h2> <ul> <li>Hardened the handling of Shadow Roots when using <code>IN_PLACE</code>, thanks <a href="https://github.com/GameZoneHacker"><code>@​GameZoneHacker</code></a></li> <li>Removed a problem leading to permanent hook pollution, thanks <a href="https://github.com/offset"><code>@​offset</code></a></li> <li>Refactored the test suite and expanded test coverage significantly</li> </ul> <h2>DOMPurify 3.4.6</h2> <ul> <li>Fixed several issues with DOM Clobbering in <code>IN_PLACE</code> mode, thanks <a href="https://github.com/offset"><code>@​offset</code></a> &amp; <a href="https://github.com/Bankde"><code>@​Bankde</code></a></li> <li>Hardened the checks for cross-realm <code>IN_PLACE</code> and Shadow DOM sanitization, thanks <a href="https://github.com/offset"><code>@​offset</code></a> &amp; <a href="https://github.com/Bankde"><code>@​Bankde</code></a></li> <li>Added more test coverage for <code>IN_PLACE</code> and general DOM Clobbering attacks</li> <li>Bumped several dependencies where possible</li> </ul> <h2>DOMPurify 3.4.5</h2> <ul> <li>Fixed a bypass caused by the new HTML element <code>selectedcontent</code> added in 3.4.4, thanks <a href="https://github.com/KabirAcharya"><code>@​KabirAcharya</code></a></li> </ul> <p><strong>Note that this is a security release for an issue introduced in 3.4.4 and should be upgraded to immediately.</strong></p> <h2>DOMPurify 3.4.4</h2> <ul> <li>Added the <code>selectedcontent</code> element to default allow-list, thanks <a href="https://github.com/lukewarlow"><code>@​lukewarlow</code></a></li> <li>Added the <code>command</code> and <code>commandfor</code> attributes to default allowed-list, thanks <a href="https://github.com/lukewarlow"><code>@​lukewarlow</code></a></li> <li>Added better template scrubbing for <code>IN_PLACE</code> operations, thanks <a href="https://github.com/DEMON1A"><code>@​DEMON1A</code></a></li> <li>Added stronger checks for cross-realm windows, thanks <a href="https://github.com/DEMON1A"><code>@​DEMON1A</code></a> &amp; <a href="https://github.com/fg0x0"><code>@​fg0x0</code></a></li> <li>Updated demo website and made sure it uses the latest from main</li> <li>Updated existing workflows, fuzzer, dependabot, etc., added more tests</li> <li>Bumped several dependencies where possible</li> </ul> <p>🚨 <strong>This release had been flagged as deprecated, please use DOMPurify 3.4.5 instead</strong> 🚨</p> <h2>DOMPurify 3.4.3</h2> <ul> <li>Fixed an issue with handling of nested Shadow DOM trees, thanks <a href="https://github.com/fishjojo1"><code>@​fishjojo1</code></a></li> <li>Fixed the template regexes to be more robust against ReDoS attacks, thanks <a href="https://github.com/aleung27"><code>@​aleung27</code></a></li> <li>Updated the node iteration code to catch more Shadow DOM related issues</li> <li>Updated Playwright and added Node 26 to test matrix</li> <li>Updated existing workflows, fuzzer, release signing, etc., added more tests</li> <li>Bumped several dependencies where possible</li> </ul> <h2>DOMPurify 3.4.2</h2> <ul> <li>Fixed an issue with URI validation on attributes allowed via <code>ADD_ATTR</code> callback, thanks <a href="https://github.com/nelstrom"><code>@​nelstrom</code></a></li> <li>Fixed an issue with source maps referring to non-existing files, thanks <a href="https://github.com/cmdcolin"><code>@​cmdcolin</code></a></li> <li>Updated existing workflows, fuzzer, release signing, etc., added more tests</li> <li>Bumped several dependencies where possible</li> </ul> <h2>DOMPurify 3.4.1</h2> <ul> <li>Fixed an issue with on-handler stripping for HTML-spec-reserved custom element names (<code>font-face</code>, <code>color-profile</code>, <code>missing-glyph</code>, <code>font-face-src</code>, <code>font-face-uri</code>, <code>font-face-format</code>, <code>font-face-name</code>) under permissive <code>CUSTOM_ELEMENT_HANDLING</code></li> </ul> <!-- raw HTML omitted --> </blockquote> <p>... (truncated)</p> </details> <details> <summary>Commits</summary> <ul> <li><a href="https://github.com/cure53/DOMPurify/commit/bcdd8285412dc9c4c149652aed2d712e790d6ccf"><code>bcdd828</code></a> release: 3.4.8 (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/cure53/DOMPurify/issues/1439">#1439</a>)</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/cure53/DOMPurify/commit/ca30f070c360df162a3e3848e80e6fd3c9e74bff"><code>ca30f07</code></a> release: 3.4.7 (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/cure53/DOMPurify/issues/1414">#1414</a>)</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/cure53/DOMPurify/commit/bb7739e5bccec7e1ab3dae3f3e42d02db3acaaae"><code>bb7739e</code></a> release: 3.4.6 (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/cure53/DOMPurify/issues/1394">#1394</a>)</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/cure53/DOMPurify/commit/011b0c78f2a0f57ee54f5fcccb697a46ca6e63ea"><code>011b0c7</code></a> release: 3.4.5 (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/cure53/DOMPurify/issues/1382">#1382</a>)</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/cure53/DOMPurify/commit/5817ad969c15e67dfcd6cb37248d6e9c1553e7c3"><code>5817ad9</code></a> release: 3.4.4 (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/cure53/DOMPurify/issues/1374">#1374</a>)</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/cure53/DOMPurify/commit/520edb0371a9638f9b51f1798051299a250c686b"><code>520edb0</code></a> release: 3.4.3 (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/cure53/DOMPurify/issues/1352">#1352</a>)</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/cure53/DOMPurify/commit/6f67fd396a7b8c64294343999fe607ca1f5299c0"><code>6f67fd3</code></a> Sync/3.4.2 (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/cure53/DOMPurify/issues/1322">#1322</a>)</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/cure53/DOMPurify/commit/5b0cdbbf52331e854c0a2de875b1a3790ecec2b8"><code>5b0cdbb</code></a> chore: merge main into 3.x for 3.4.1 release (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/cure53/DOMPurify/issues/1301">#1301</a>)</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/cure53/DOMPurify/commit/09f59115a311469de5b625225760593e551f080a"><code>09f5911</code></a> test: added three more browsers to test setup (OSX, mobile)</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/cure53/DOMPurify/commit/5b16e0b892e82b1779d62b9928b43c4c4ff290b9"><code>5b16e0b</code></a> Getting 3.x branch ready for 3.4.0 release (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/cure53/DOMPurify/issues/1250">#1250</a>)</li> <li>Additional commits viewable in <a href="https://github.com/cure53/DOMPurify/compare/3.3.2...3.4.8">compare view</a></li> </ul> </details> <details> <summary>Install script changes</summary> <p>This version adds <code>prepare</code> script that runs during installation. Review the package contents before updating.</p> </details> <br /> Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>	2026-06-03 23:20:50 -07:00
dependabot[bot]	07ec29bd84	build(deps): bump ajv from 8.18.0 to 8.20.0 (#7323) ... Bumps [ajv](https://github.com/ajv-validator/ajv) from 8.18.0 to 8.20.0. <details> <summary>Release notes</summary> <p><em>Sourced from <a href="https://github.com/ajv-validator/ajv/releases">ajv's releases</a>.</em></p> <blockquote> <h2>v8.20.0</h2> <h2>What's Changed</h2> <ul> <li>fix: add support for node 22/24, drop node 16/21 by <a href="https://github.com/jasoniangreen"><code>@​jasoniangreen</code></a> in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/ajv-validator/ajv/pull/2580">ajv-validator/ajv#2580</a></li> <li>fix: add ES2022.RegExp for RegExpIndicesArray by <a href="https://github.com/SignpostMarv"><code>@​SignpostMarv</code></a> in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/ajv-validator/ajv/pull/2604">ajv-validator/ajv#2604</a></li> </ul> <p><strong>Full Changelog</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/ajv-validator/ajv/compare/v8.19.0...v8.20.0">https://github.com/ajv-validator/ajv/compare/v8.19.0...v8.20.0</a></p> <h2>v8.19.0</h2> <h2>What's Changed</h2> <ul> <li>fix prototype pollution via format keyword using $data ref by <a href="https://github.com/epoberezkin"><code>@​epoberezkin</code></a> in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/ajv-validator/ajv/pull/2607">ajv-validator/ajv#2607</a></li> </ul> <p><strong>Full Changelog</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/ajv-validator/ajv/compare/v8.18.0...v8.19.0">https://github.com/ajv-validator/ajv/compare/v8.18.0...v8.19.0</a></p> </blockquote> </details> <details> <summary>Commits</summary> <ul> <li><a href="https://github.com/ajv-validator/ajv/commit/0fba0b8e649909613cfce0999b149cd08f4a4987"><code>0fba0b8</code></a> 8.20.0</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/ajv-validator/ajv/commit/9caf8d64409b05e2c670b3ff09cf7ca07937342e"><code>9caf8d6</code></a> fix: add ES2022.RegExp for RegExpIndicesArray; fixes <a href="https://redirect.github.com/ajv-validator/ajv/issues/2603">ajv-validator/ajv#2603</a> (...</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/ajv-validator/ajv/commit/206535071f776f57737394c8896d4b2dc2bfb9a3"><code>2065350</code></a> fix: add support for node 22/24, drop node 16/21 (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/ajv-validator/ajv/issues/2580">#2580</a>)</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/ajv-validator/ajv/commit/154b58d690c6596e09ca676e12720ab8234ee3d2"><code>154b58d</code></a> 8.19.0</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/ajv-validator/ajv/commit/e8d2bdc501b3ba6f03922db5e595770d4763d9da"><code>e8d2bdc</code></a> test/fix prototype pollution via $data ref with format keyword (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/ajv-validator/ajv/issues/2607">#2607</a>)</li> <li>See full diff in <a href="https://github.com/ajv-validator/ajv/compare/v8.18.0...v8.20.0">compare view</a></li> </ul> </details> <br /> Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>	2026-06-03 23:18:48 -07:00
Devin Foley	93206f73fa	fix: Stop archived companies from waking agents (#7478) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies > - Each agent has a heartbeat scheduler that wakes it on timers and on events; every wake spawns an adapter (Claude / Codex / …) run that bills the operator's subscription > - When an operator archives a company, the agents inside it remain in invokable states — the heartbeat scheduler never consults company status — so timers keep firing and event-driven wakes (comments, mentions, blockers-resolved, etc.) keep cascading > - On real deployments this silently drains the operator's subscription: idle archived companies wake their CEOs hourly, plus any cross-company event cascade > - This pull request enforces "archived ⇒ never spawns a run" as a structural invariant by guarding the wake path AND cascading agent state on archive/reactivate > - The benefit is that archived companies stop billing the operator, and the UI/queue stays consistent with the invariant ## What Changed - `server/src/services/heartbeat.ts`: - `enqueueWakeup()` loads the company and short-circuits when status is not `active`. Background sources (timer, automation, events) write a `company.inactive` skipped wake and return `null`; explicit user invokes throw a `conflict` so the UI surfaces the real reason. - `tickTimers()` joins agents to active companies so the scheduler does not iterate archived-company agents at all (no skip-row noise). - `server/src/services/companies.ts`: - `archive(id, actor?)` pauses runnable agents with `pauseReason = "company_archived"` inside the transaction (preserving `pending_approval`, `terminated`, and agents paused for unrelated reasons), then cancels `queued`/`running` heartbeat runs after the transaction commits. - `update(id, data, actor?)` reverses the cascade only for agents whose `pauseReason === "company_archived"` on the `archived → active` transition; manually-paused agents stay paused. - Both methods emit activity-log entries (`company.archived` with `agentsPaused` + `runsCancelled`, `company.reactivated` with `agentsRestored`) so the audit trail fires regardless of caller. - `packages/shared/src/constants.ts` + `server/src/services/budgets.ts`: add `company_archived` to the legal `PauseReason` union so the restorable marker is a first-class value. - `packages/db/src/migrations/0094_backfill_archived_company_agent_pauses.sql`: backfill so existing archived-company agents become `paused / company_archived` (excludes `pending_approval`). - `ui/src/lib/activity-format.ts`: add the `company.reactivated` label. ## Verification - `npx vitest run src/__tests__/companies-service.test.ts` — archive cascade, reactivate cascade, and activity-log entries (with counts) all pass. - `npx vitest run src/__tests__/heartbeat-archived-company-guard.test.ts` — timer + on-demand + event-wake paths all blocked for archived companies; `company.inactive` skipped-wake row written; user-initiated wakes throw `conflict`. - `pnpm typecheck` — clean. - Manual repro from the bug description: archive a company, wait an interval / post a comment on one of its issues, observe zero new heartbeat runs. ## Risks - Migration `0094` is a single bulk UPDATE on `agents` joined to archived `companies`. On large deployments it briefly holds row locks on archived-company agent rows; should be quick because the predicate is narrow (`status NOT IN (paused, terminated, pending_approval)` and `companies.status = 'archived'`). - New `pauseReason` value (`company_archived`) is opaque to older clients that only know the previous union. Acceptable because the union is read as plain text and the contract is sync'd in the same change. - Behavior change for users: invoking an agent in an archived company now fails with a conflict instead of silently spawning a run. Intended. ## Model Used - Claude (Anthropic) — model `claude-opus-4-7` ("Opus 4.7"), Claude Code CLI, with tool use (Read/Edit/Bash/Grep). No extended thinking mode. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [ ] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots — N/A, no UI changes beyond an activity-log label string - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge ## Related Work Fixes #1348 (`[Bug] Archived companies still running heartbeats and consuming tokens`). Prior attempts and parallel work in this area: - #1365 and #1429 by @hungdqdesign (March 2026) — both closed without merging. Same three-layer shape (`tickTimers` / `enqueueWakeup` / `resumeQueuedRuns` + archive-route cancellation) targeting #1348. Credit for first publicly proposing the wake-path-guard approach. - #5865 by @stubbi (May 2026, open) — adds the same `companies.status != 'archived'` joins to `tickTimers`, `enqueueWakeup`, `resumeQueuedRuns`, **and** routines `tickScheduledTriggers`, bundled with plugin-table tenant isolation (`plugin_entities` / `plugin_job_runs` / `plugin_logs` / `plugin_webhook_deliveries` get a `companyId` FK with `ON DELETE CASCADE`). This PR is narrower — it does not touch routines or plugin tables — but adds the **archive cascade** (pause agents with `pauseReason = "company_archived"`), the **reactivate reverse** (un-pause only that subset), the **`company_archived` pause-reason marker**, and a **backfill migration** for pre-existing archived companies, which #5865 does not include. Happy to coordinate sequencing or rebase if #5865 lands first.	2026-06-03 21:07:14 -07:00
Ramon-nassa	62863126a3	fix(plugin-tool-dispatcher): propagate pluginDbId so worker.isRunning resolves (#5671) ... Fixes #2391 Fixes #3394 Fixes #4094 Fixes #5501 Fixes #5916 Fixes #6215 Fixes #6514 ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies > - Plugins extend the platform by registering agent-callable tools backed by long-running worker processes > - `PluginToolDispatcher` is the boundary between the HTTP `/api/plugins/tools/execute` route and `PluginWorkerManager`, which owns those worker processes > - `PluginWorkerManager` keys live workers by the plugin's **database UUID**, but `plugin-loader` was registering tools using only `pluginKey` — so every tool call did `workerManager.isRunning(pluginKey)` and always got `false` > - As a result, every `POST /api/plugins/tools/execute` against a tool-exposing plugin returned 502 `worker for plugin X is not running`, even though the worker process was alive (hit in production by `vexion.council-chat`; `mem0-sync` would be next) > - This pull request threads the DB UUID through the dispatcher → registry hop and hardens the contract so omitting the UUID is a compile-time error, not a silent fallback > - The benefit is plugin tool execution actually works for any plugin declaring `manifest.tools[]`, and the type system prevents the same bug from recurring ## What Changed - `server/src/services/plugin-loader.ts` — pass in-scope `pluginId` (DB UUID) as the third argument to `toolDispatcher.registerPluginTools`. Single-line root fix. - `server/src/services/plugin-tool-dispatcher.ts` — `registerPluginTools` now takes `pluginDbId: string` (required, was optional). JSDoc updated to document the worker-routing contract and why the optional signature masked the bug. - `server/src/services/plugin-tool-registry.ts` — `registerPlugin` throws on missing/empty `pluginDbId` so any new call site that forgets the UUID fails immediately rather than silently falling back to `pluginKey`. - `server/src/__tests__/plugin-tool-dispatcher-pluginDbId.test.ts` — new focused regression suite covering the activation path, disable→enable lifecycle, worker re-spawn, and the empty-UUID guard. ## Verification - `pnpm vitest run server/src/__tests__/plugin-tool-dispatcher-pluginDbId.test.ts` — 6/6 passing. - `pnpm vitest run server/src/__tests__/plugin-database.test.ts server/src/__tests__/plugin-routes-authz.test.ts server/src/__tests__/plugin-lifecycle-restart.test.ts` — 48/48 passing on the merge commit. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck` — no new errors introduced by these files. - Manual repro path: 1. Install a plugin that declares `manifest.tools[]` and uses `runWorker`. 2. Confirm status `ready` and a live worker (`paperclipai plugin diagnostics <key>`). 3. `POST /api/plugins/tools/execute` with `{ tool: "<pluginKey>:<toolName>", parameters, runContext }`. 4. Pre-fix: HTTP 502, `worker for plugin <key> is not running`. Post-fix: tool dispatches normally. ## Risks - Low risk. The signature tightening (`pluginDbId?` → `pluginDbId`) is a back-compatible behavioral fix at the only production call site (`plugin-loader`), which already had the UUID in scope. - Test/recovery paths that previously omitted the UUID must now supply it; the new error message identifies the missing arg explicitly. - No database migration, no API/schema change, no plugin-author-facing change. - The merge commit pulls master into the PR branch additively (no rebase); reviewers can read the fix commits independently of the merge. ## Model Used - Provider/model: Anthropic Claude (Opus 4.7, `claude-opus-4-7`) for the additive merge-conflict resolution, PR description rewrite, and Greptile follow-up; original fix authored by [@Ramon-nassa](https://github.com/Ramon-nassa). - Capabilities used: tool use (file edit, shell, GitHub CLI), extended thinking off, no code execution by the model. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [ ] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots (N/A — server-only change) - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --- ## Original Summary (preserved from contributor) `plugin-loader` activates plugins and calls ```ts toolDispatcher.registerPluginTools(pluginKey, manifest) ``` with only two args. `PluginToolDispatcher.registerPluginTools` forwards them to `registry.registerPlugin(pluginKey, manifest)`. The registry falls back `pluginDbId ?? pluginKey`, but `PluginWorkerManager` keys live workers by the DB UUID — so the downstream ```ts workerManager.isRunning(pluginKey) // always false ``` causes every `POST /api/plugins/tools/execute` to fail with `worker for plugin X is not running`, even when the worker process is alive and healthy. **This hits every plugin that exposes tools** (we hit it in `vexion.council-chat`; `mem0-sync` would too). Reported-by: Vexion / Ramon Nassar (vexion.council-chat plugin, MO-068). --------- Co-authored-by: ramon nassar <ramon@tabs.co> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Co-authored-by: Devin Foley <devin@devinfoley.com> Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-06-03 19:13:21 -07:00
Aron Prins	70b1a9109d	Improve CLI API parity coverage (#6626) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is a control plane for AI-agent companies, with the CLI acting as a scriptable operator and agent interface to that control plane. > - The REST API surface has grown across companies, agents, issues, routines, plugins, auth, workspaces, secrets, and operational inspection commands. > - The CLI had drifted from that API surface: some commands were missing, some command shapes differed from docs/reference material, and several edge cases only failed during end-to-end local-source testing. > - The local development runbook requires these tests to be disposable and isolated from a real `~/.paperclip`, `~/.codex`, or `~/.claude` installation. > - This pull request adds broad CLI/API parity coverage, fixes the actionable bugs found during that pass, and records the reproducible test log under `doc/logs`. > - The benefit is a more complete, scriptable CLI surface with regression coverage for the command families exercised by the parity run. ## What Changed - Added or expanded CLI command coverage for access/auth, companies, agents, projects, goals, issues and subresources, routines, plugins, workspaces, activity/run/cost/dashboard inspection, assets, skills, secrets, tokens, prompt/wake flows, and local setup helpers. - Fixed CLI/API parity bugs found during the run, including context profile patching, issue interaction optional payloads, malformed tree-hold errors, environment duplicate handling, configure invalid-section exit codes, worktree pnpm invocation, token agent ID resolution, plugin tool worker lookup, and routine webhook secret cleanup. - Added missing CLI wrappers and route coverage for health/access, invite resolution URL forwarding, join status normalization, secret lifecycle commands, LLM docs routes, available-skill isolation, positive board-claim coverage, and interactive `connect` prompt-flow tests. - Added a schema-backed `/api/openapi.json` route sufficient for CLI parity and `paperclipai openapi --json` smoke coverage. - Added `doc/logs/2026-05-24-cli-api-parity-e2e-log.md` with the detailed living test/bug log and renamed the log directory from `doc/bugs` to `doc/logs`. - Added `doc/plans/2026-05-23-cli-api-parity.md` and the OpenAPI parity reference used during the pass. OpenAPI note: this PR intentionally does not try to subsume `feature/openapi-spec`. The OpenAPI implementation here is schema-backed and better than the earlier route-inventory stub, but `feature/openapi-spec` is the fuller/better OpenAPI branch because it includes exact mounted-route coverage tests and additional current route coverage. That branch should stay as its own PR and can supersede this OpenAPI route implementation. ## Verification Targeted automated checks run: - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/openapi-routes.test.ts` - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/board-claim.test.ts` - `pnpm exec vitest run cli/src/__tests__/connect.test.ts` - `pnpm exec vitest run cli/src/__tests__/agent-lifecycle.test.ts` - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/plugin-database.test.ts` - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/routines-service.test.ts` - `pnpm --dir cli typecheck` - `pnpm --dir server typecheck` Manual/local E2E verification: - Ran the full disposable local-source CLI/API parity pass with isolated `PAPERCLIP_HOME`, `PAPERCLIP_CONFIG`, `PAPERCLIP_CONTEXT`, `PAPERCLIP_AUTH_STORE`, `CODEX_HOME`, and `CLAUDE_HOME` under `tmp/cli-api-parity`. - Verified `DATABASE_URL` and `DATABASE_MIGRATION_URL` stayed unset for the scratch server. - Verified live health and schema-backed OpenAPI responses on non-default port `3197`. - Revoked created board/agent tokens and cleaned up temporary plugins, secrets, non-default environments, and project workspaces. - See `doc/logs/2026-05-24-cli-api-parity-e2e-log.md` for the full command-by-command reproduction log. Not run: - Full `pnpm test`, `pnpm test:run`, or `pnpm build` were not run after the entire branch because the branch is broad and the parity pass used focused test/typecheck verification plus live isolated CLI reruns. ## Risks - This is a broad PR and touches many CLI command modules, so review surface is high. The changes are grouped around one theme, but a split may be easier if maintainers prefer narrower PRs. - The OpenAPI route in this PR is not the final/best OpenAPI implementation. `feature/openapi-spec` has stronger exact-route coverage and should remain the source for the dedicated OpenAPI PR. - The living log is intentionally detailed and large. It is useful for reproducibility but adds documentation weight. - No UI changes are intended; screenshots are not applicable. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex, GPT-5-based coding agent in Codex desktop. Exact served model/context-window identifier was not exposed in the local app. Work used shell/Git/GitHub CLI tooling, local source inspection, targeted test execution, and live isolated Paperclip CLI/API smoke testing. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Devin Foley <devin@devinfoley.com>	2026-06-02 17:13:29 -07:00
aperim-agent	d58a862549	fix(issues): coerce anchor.createdAt to Date before postgres binding (PRO-3144) (#5220) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents in a control plane backed by Postgres + drizzle-orm > - `listComments` is the cursor-paginated comment listing on the issues service; the cursor branch uses Drizzle's `gt`/`lt`/`eq` against `issueComments.createdAt` > - On postgres.js v3.4.8, passing a `Date` instance through the comparison helpers triggers `TypeError [ERR_INVALID_ARG_TYPE]: The "string" argument must be of type string or an instance of Buffer or ArrayBuffer. Received an instance of Date` > - The driver's binding path expects a Date constructed via the standard runtime, but drizzle's `select` returns instances that don't satisfy that check in this version > - This PR coerces `anchor.createdAt` through `toISOString()` → `new Date(...)` so the comparison helpers always receive a binding-safe Date, then folds in a follow-up that hoists the Date into a single allocation reused across all four `gt`/`lt`/`eq` call sites > - The benefit is `listComments` cursor pagination stops 500-ing on Pg v3.4.8 with one Date allocation per call instead of four, exercised by both ascending and descending cursor tests ## What Changed - `server/src/services/issues.ts` — coerce `anchor.createdAt` to a binding-safe `Date` once and reuse the same instance across all four cursor comparisons (`gt` / `lt` / `eq`) - `server/src/__tests__/issues-service.test.ts` — add an ascending-cursor sibling test so both `gt` and `lt` cursor paths are exercised; the existing descending test continues to pass ## Verification ```bash # Both cursor branches pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server exec vitest run \ src/__tests__/issues-service.test.ts -t "anchor comment" # → 2 passed, 41 skipped # Production smoke curl -s "$PAPERCLIP_API_URL/api/issues/<issueId>/comments?after=<commentId>&order=asc" \ -H "Authorization: Bearer $PAPERCLIP_API_KEY" # Expect: JSON array, no 500 TypeError ``` ## Risks - Low risk. Pure cursor-pagination internals in `listComments`; no schema, migration, or external contract changes - Drizzle's `gt`/`lt`/`eq` continue to receive a `Date` for the timestamp column, producing the same bound parameter as before - Behavioural surface is exercised by ascending + descending cursor tests against a real Postgres test database ## Model Used - Claude Opus 4.7 (`claude-opus-4-7`), no extended-thinking mode, used for the hoist+test follow-up commit ## Fixes Closes #2612, Closes #3661, Closes #3830 ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [ ] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots — n/a, backend-only - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes — n/a, no docs touched - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Elena Voronova <elena@paperclip.ing> Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> Co-authored-by: Devin Foley <devin@devinfoley.com>	2026-06-02 15:26:59 -07:00
Dotta	edeab22c28	Merge pull request #7362 from paperclipai/pap-10195-dev-runner-race ... [codex] Fix dev runner snapshot race	2026-06-01 15:34:28 -10:00
Dotta	dc58544832	Address dev runner snapshot review feedback	2026-06-01 22:03:51 +00:00
Dotta	8f25ba6381	Add dev runner snapshot race regression test	2026-06-01 21:55:30 +00:00
Dotta	8af359b656	Detect misclassified video attachments ... Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-06-01 21:45:27 +00:00
Dotta	e080e4686a	Move artifact upload details to skill reference ... Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-05-31 18:18:48 +00:00