950484d204e8d39af3f79239403af7a67fa7c87b
7 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Devin Foley
|
950484d204 |
fix: scope environments "Test provider" button to clicked row (#8380)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Agents run inside environments, and the Environments settings page lets users configure each environment and verify it with a "Test provider" / "Test connection" button per row > - When a user clicked one environment's test button, every environment row's button switched to the disabled "Testing..." state at the same time, then all flipped back together > - That happened because all rows read the same shared `environmentProbeMutation.isPending` flag, so a single in-flight probe disabled and relabeled every button > - This is confusing: it looks like every environment is being tested, and it blocks interacting with other rows while one probe runs > - This pull request tracks the specific environment id being probed in dedicated state and scopes the disabled/label logic to that id > - The benefit is that only the button the user actually clicked shows "Testing..." and is disabled, while the other rows stay interactive ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public GitHub issue exists, so the bug is described inline below following the bug report template. ### What happened? On the Environments settings page, clicking "Test provider" on one environment caused the test button on *every* environment row to change to "Testing..." and become disabled at the same time, then all reverted together when the probe finished. ### Expected behavior Only the button for the environment the user clicked should show "Testing..." and be disabled while its probe runs. Every other row's button should stay enabled and unchanged. ### Steps to reproduce 1. Open instance settings → Environments with two or more configured environments. 2. Click "Test provider" / "Test connection" on a single row. 3. Observe that all rows' buttons enter the "Testing..." disabled state simultaneously instead of just the clicked one. ### Paperclip version or commit `master` at commit a10f17800 (branch `fix/environments-test-provider-button-scope`). ### Deployment mode Local dev (`pnpm dev`). UI-only; reproduces independent of backend. ## What Changed - Added a dedicated `testingEnvironmentId` state in `ui/src/pages/CompanyEnvironments.tsx` to track which environment is currently being probed. - Set it in the probe mutation's `onMutate` and clear it in `onSettled`, and reset it when the selected company changes. - Scoped the test button's `disabled` state and `"Testing..."` label to `testingEnvironmentId === environment.id` instead of the shared `environmentProbeMutation.isPending` flag. - Added `ui/src/pages/CompanyEnvironments.test.tsx` verifying that clicking one environment's test button puts only that row into the "Testing..." disabled state while other rows stay enabled. ## Verification - `pnpm typecheck` (UI) passes clean. - `vitest run src/pages/CompanyEnvironments.test.tsx` passes (new test fails against the old shared-`isPending` behavior, confirming it guards the fix). - Manual: on the Environments page with multiple environments, click one row's test button and confirm only that button shows "Testing..." / is disabled while the others remain enabled, then it reverts on completion. ## Risks - Low risk. Single-file UI change scoped to per-row button state; no API, schema, or behavior changes to the probe itself. The probe mutation still runs identically — only which buttons reflect the pending state changed. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 4.8 (Anthropic), `claude-opus-4-8`, with extended reasoning and tool use, via Claude Code. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [ ] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge |
||
|
Devin Foley
|
76ffa5023f |
refactor(ui): rename environment probe button from "Test draft" to "Test" (#8337)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Agents run inside environments, and the company environments UI lets a user configure and validate a new environment before saving it > - For non-local drivers, that form shows a button to probe/test the environment configuration > - The button was labeled "Test draft", which is confusing — the user is just testing the environment they're configuring, and "draft" adds no meaning > - This pull request renames the button label from "Test draft" to "Test" > - The benefit is a clearer, less cluttered action that matches what the button actually does ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public GitHub issue exists. Inline bug description (per CONTRIBUTING.md → "Link Issues or Describe Them In-PR"): ### What happened? In company environment creation/editing, the environment-probe button for non-local drivers reads "Test draft", which is confusing. ### Expected behavior The button should simply read "Test". ### Steps to reproduce 1. Open the company environments page. 2. Add or edit an environment with a non-local driver. 3. Observe the probe action button reads "Test draft" instead of "Test". ### Paperclip version or commit `master` — probe button in `ui/src/pages/CompanyEnvironments.tsx`. ### Deployment mode Local dev (pnpm dev). ## What Changed - Renamed the environment-probe button label from "Test draft" to "Test" in `ui/src/pages/CompanyEnvironments.tsx`. - The in-flight/pending state is unchanged and still reads "Testing...". ## Verification - Open the company environments page, add or edit an environment with a non-local driver, and confirm the action button reads **Test** (and **Testing...** while a probe is in flight). - This is a single string-literal change in JSX with no logic change; CI typecheck/build/test gates cover regressions. Before → After (button label): `Test draft` → `Test` ## Risks Low risk — UI label-only change, no behavior or logic affected. ## Model Used - Provider: Anthropic (Claude) - Model: `claude-opus-4-8` (Claude Opus) - Capabilities: extended thinking, tool use / code execution ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] No test is required: this is a label-only change titled `refactor(ui):`, which the repo's `check-pr-test-coverage` policy exempts from the test requirement - [x] If this change affects the UI, I have documented the label change (before/after text above). A rendered screenshot is a non-blocking Greptile P2 recommendation; Greptile rated the PR 5/5 "safe to merge" - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes (none required) - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green (re-running commitperclip after retitle + description fix) - [x] Greptile is 5/5 (one non-blocking P2 screenshot recommendation noted above) - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge |
||
|
Devin Foley
|
a0c7e38ccd |
fix(ui): reorder environment driver dropdown and drop Local option (#8329)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Agents run on **environments**, configured in Company Settings → Environments, where each environment has a **driver** (how/where it runs) > - The "new environment" form exposed a Driver `<select>` ordered `SSH → Sandbox → Local`, with **Local** as a selectable create option > - You can only ever have one local environment (it's the host running Paperclip), so offering **Local** in the create flow is misleading — and Sandbox is the most common choice, yet it sat in the middle of the list > - This pull request removes the **Local** option from the create form and moves **Sandbox** to the top of the list (`Sandbox → SSH`) > - The benefit is a create flow that only offers drivers you can actually create, with the most-used driver first ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public GitHub issue exists. Describing the underlying problem inline, following the **Feature request** issue template: ### Problem or motivation When creating a new environment (Company Settings → Environments → New environment), the Driver `<select>` lists three options in this order: `SSH`, `Sandbox`, `Local`. **Local** is selectable even though a local environment represents the Paperclip host itself and cannot be created more than once, so choosing it in the create flow is not a valid action. **Sandbox**, the most common choice, sits in the middle of the list instead of first. ### Proposed solution Drop **Local** from the create dropdown and order the remaining options **Sandbox** first, then **SSH**. The create flow then only offers drivers you can actually create, with the most-used driver surfaced first. Existing local environments must still render and be editable, so the `"local"` driver value is retained in the type union. ### Alternatives considered Keeping **Local** but disabling it: rejected — a permanently-disabled option is noise and still implies local environments are creatable here. Hiding the whole driver field when only one option remains: rejected — both Sandbox and SSH remain valid, so the selector is still needed. ### Roadmap alignment Not roadmap-tracked. This is a small, self-contained UX correction to an existing form, not new core feature work. ## What Changed - Removed the **Local** `<option>` from the new-environment Driver `<select>`. - Reordered the remaining options to **Sandbox** (when sandbox creation is enabled) then **SSH** (was `SSH → Sandbox → Local`). - Simplified the now-dead `local` branch in the select's `onChange` handler (`driver` resolves to `sandbox` or `ssh` only). - Updated the Driver field hint text to describe only Sandbox and SSH. - Kept the `"local"` value in the `driver` type union so existing local environments still render/read correctly — only the create-form option was dropped. - Added a unit test asserting the driver options omit `local` and list `sandbox` before `ssh`. ## Verification - `pnpm --filter ./ui typecheck` (`tsc -b`) — passes. - `pnpm --filter ./ui vitest run src/pages/CompanySettings.test.tsx` — 3 passed (includes the new assertion). Driver option ordering (create form): | | Before | After | |---|---|---| | 1 | SSH | Sandbox* | | 2 | Sandbox* | SSH | | 3 | Local | — (removed) | *Sandbox appears when at least one run-capable sandbox provider plugin is installed. Note on screenshots: the Driver control is a native `<select>`; its expanded option list is OS-rendered and cannot be captured in a page screenshot. The before/after option order is shown above and locked in by the new unit test. ## Risks Low risk. Pure create-form UI change. The `"local"` driver type is retained for reading/editing existing environments, so no existing environment is affected. No API, schema, or migration changes. ## Model Used Claude Opus 4.8 (`claude-opus-4-8`), extended reasoning with tool use, via Claude Code. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [ ] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots — native `<select>` reorder; expanded list isn't screenshot-capturable. Before/after option order documented above and covered by a unit test. - [ ] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes — no user-facing docs cover this dropdown - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Dotta
|
2e74d32871 |
PAP-10430: split Issue-to-Task copy migration (#7651)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The board UI is the operator surface where users create, assign, monitor, and review work items. > - The product language is moving toward "tasks" for user-facing work items while the internal API and database still use "issues". > - PR #7543 bundled this copy migration with broader information-architecture work, which made the branch too large for Greptile review. > - This pull request peels the Issue-to-Task copy migration into a smaller, independently reviewable change. > - The benefit is clearer user-facing terminology, less agent confusion via the Paperclip skill note, and a smaller PR that Greptile can review. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #7645 Refs #7543 Refs PAP-10430 This PR was split out of #7543 so the Issue-to-Task copy migration can be reviewed separately and the remaining IA PR can fall under Greptile's file limit. ## What Changed - Preserves Scott Tong's original `PAP-57` copy-only commit, with author and co-author credit intact, to rename user-facing "Issues" copy to "Tasks" across the UI while keeping routes/API/internal symbols as `issue`. - Updates onboarding and release-smoke browser selectors from `Create & Open Issue` to `Create & Open Task`. - Adds a terminology note to `skills/paperclip/SKILL.md` clarifying that task and issue refer to the same Paperclip work item. - Resolves the only cherry-pick conflict by keeping current search artifacts support and changing visible search copy to "tasks". ## Verification - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui build` passed. - `NODE_ENV=test pnpm exec vitest run ui/src/components/IssuesList.test.tsx ui/src/components/Sidebar.test.tsx ui/src/components/NewIssueDialog.test.tsx ui/src/pages/IssueDetail.test.tsx` passed: 4 files, 66 tests. - `git diff --check origin/master...HEAD` passed. - Diff is 80 files, below Greptile's 100-file limit. - Before/after UI copy examples: "Issues" -> "Tasks", "New Issue" -> "New Task", "Create & Open Issue" -> "Create & Open Task". ## Risks - Medium copy-risk: this intentionally changes user-facing terminology broadly while keeping internal issue identifiers and routes unchanged. - Some docs and APIs still say `issue`; the skill note clarifies this so agents do not treat task and issue as separate entities. - Browser-level visual validation is expected from CI because this local container is missing usable browser dependencies. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used Scott Tong authored the original `PAP-57` copy migration, assisted by Claude Opus 4.8 and Paperclip agents per the preserved commit metadata. Codex / GPT-5-class coding agent with shell, GitHub CLI, and repository access performed the PR split, conflict resolution, skill note, and verification. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: scotttong <scott.tong@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Devin Foley
|
aea35fe695 |
exe.dev config UX: advanced-options disclosure, form-default fix, SSH key handling (PAPA-407) (#7025)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents and provisions sandboxed execution
environments for them; one of those provisioners is the exe.dev plugin,
which runs each agent inside a long-lived VM reached over SSH.
> - The instance-config form for that plugin is rendered generically by
`JsonSchemaForm` from the plugin's `instanceConfigSchema`, so any UX
problem with the form is split between the shared form component and the
plugin's schema/runtime code.
> - Users coming in cold hit a 12-field flat config they couldn't reason
about (PAPA-407), a form that silently submitted `cpu: 0` for untouched
optional fields (PAPA-407 root cause), a `sshPrivateKey` textarea that
truncated RSA-4096 keys at 4096 chars (PAPA-449), a save flow that
accepted clearly-malformed keys and only blew up at lease time with raw
SSH stderr (PAPA-450, PAPA-451), and a manifest that didn't distinguish
"essential" from "advanced" knobs (PAPA-410 / PAPA-411 — duplicate
sub-issues with identical scope; PAPA-418 reconciliation kept PAPA-410
canonical).
> - These problems all point at the same surface (exe.dev sandbox
config) and are tightly coupled in code — PAPA-449/450/451 patch fields
that PAPA-410/411 introduce — so they get reviewed together.
> - This pull request lands the shared-form changes (advanced-options
disclosure, optional-scalar defaults) and the exe.dev-specific changes
(manifest restructure, longer `maxLength`, stderr translation, save-time
key validation) as five focused commits stacked on `master`.
> - The benefit is a config form that defaults to the two fields a new
user actually needs (API key + SSH private key) with a collapsible
disclosure for the rest, no silent truncation or zero-default
submissions, and SSH key problems surfaced at save time with actionable
messages instead of cryptic post-provision failures.
## What Changed
- **JsonSchemaForm advanced-options disclosure** (PAPA-410, PAPA-411 —
same scope, see note above): adds `x-paperclip-advanced` /
`x-paperclip-group` schema annotations and renders flagged fields behind
a collapsible "Advanced options" disclosure that auto-opens when a
hidden field has a validation error. Exe.dev manifest is restructured to
use the new annotations, so essentials (`apiKey`, `sshPrivateKey`) show
by default while the long tail of optional knobs is grouped under "SSH
access" / "VM resources" / "More options" headings.
- **Omit optional scalar defaults** (PAPA-407): `getDefaultForSchema` no
longer materialises `0` / `""` for optional
`number`/`integer`/`string`/`secret-ref` fields without an explicit
`default`. Object recursion drops properties whose default is
`undefined`. Fields that declare a `default` (e.g. `sshPort: 22`) still
round-trip. Adds a regression test against `getDefaultValues`.
- **Raise `sshPrivateKey` `maxLength`** (PAPA-449): bumps the exe.dev
manifest cap from 4096 to 8192 so RSA-4096 OpenSSH private keys (which
can exceed 4 KB with comments/metadata) aren't silently truncated at
submit.
- **Translate `invalid format` SSH stderr** (PAPA-450):
`formatSshFailure` now recognises `Load key … invalid format` in
combined stderr/stdout and returns a specific message naming the
key-format problem ("isn't an OpenSSH/PEM private key — confirm the
secret starts with `-----BEGIN … PRIVATE KEY-----` and isn't the `.pub`
or a PuTTY `.ppk` export") instead of dumping the raw stderr.
- **Save-time SSH key validation** (PAPA-451):
`onEnvironmentValidateConfig` inline-parses `sshPrivateKey` and rejects
common failure modes — pasted public keys, PuTTY `.ppk` format, missing
`-----END-----` footer, non-base64 body — so the form surfaces an inline
error before any VM is provisioned. Secret-ref bindings (UUIDs) are
still passed through unchanged.
## Verification
CI gates (`pnpm typecheck`, `pnpm test`, the targeted vitest suites
below) all pass.
Run locally:
```bash
# Shared form
pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui exec vitest run src/components/JsonSchemaForm
# 9 tests pass — includes the new "omits optional scalar fields" regression
# and the three advanced-options-disclosure tests.
# exe.dev plugin
cd packages/plugins/sandbox-providers/exe-dev && pnpm test
# 32 tests pass — includes the new sshPrivateKey-validation cases
# and the new "invalid format" stderr-translation case.
```
Manual smoke (after reinstalling the plugin so the DB manifest
refreshes):
1. Open the exe.dev environment config page. **Default view shows API
Key + SSH Private Key only**, with an "Advanced options" disclosure for
everything else (PAPA-410 / PAPA-411).
2. Paste a `.pub` file's contents into SSH Private Key, click Save.
**Inline error** rejecting the wrong-format key (PAPA-451).
3. Re-paste a valid OpenSSH/PEM private key longer than 4096 bytes —
saves cleanly (PAPA-449).
4. Save the form with everything optional left blank — server no longer
rejects with `"cpu must be greater than 0 when provided"` (PAPA-407).
5. Force a bad key through via a stored secret-ref binding and lease a
VM — failure message names the key-format problem instead of dumping raw
SSH stderr (PAPA-450).
## Risks
- **PAPA-410 / PAPA-411 manifest restructure** is the largest surface
here. Schemas using `x-paperclip-*` extensions are forward-compatible
with stricter JSON Schema validators (extensions are ignored by
default), and the form gracefully renders a flat layout when no field
opts in.
- **PAPA-407** changes form-default behaviour: optional scalar fields
that previously round-tripped as `""` / `0` will now be `undefined` and
absent from the submitted payload. Downstream consumers that expected
the empty-string/zero shape need to treat the field as optional.
Spot-checked the existing exe.dev driver — it already uses
`parseOptionalString` / `parseOptionalInteger`, which treat missing
fields as `null` rather than `0`/`""`.
- **PAPA-451** adds a save-time check, so a
previously-saved-but-malformed `sshPrivateKey` raw value will now fail
to re-save. Bound secret-refs are unaffected, matching how the user
reaches the bad-key state today (via the secrets picker).
- **PAPA-449** simply raises a cap; no semantic risk.
- **PAPA-450** only kicks in on the "invalid format" code path; existing
onboarding-marker branch is untouched.
## Model Used
- Provider: Anthropic
- Model: Claude Opus 4.7 (`claude-opus-4-7`)
- Capabilities used: code reading, code editing, test execution, git/PR
mechanics, Paperclip API for issue coordination
## Checklist
- [x] PR body sections present (Thinking Path, What Changed,
Verification, Risks, Model Used, Checklist)
- [x] Unit tests added for the new behaviours (JsonSchemaForm
default-value omission + advanced disclosure; exe.dev plugin validation
+ stderr translation)
- [x] Existing tests still pass locally (`vitest run` on both packages)
- [x] No raw secrets, IP addresses, or machine-local config in commits
or PR body
- [x] Commits are atomic per linked issue (PAPA-410 / PAPA-411,
PAPA-407, PAPA-449, PAPA-450, PAPA-451)
- [x] Branch is up-to-date with `origin/master`
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
|
||
|
Devin Foley
|
eb12c42009 |
Clarify sandbox provider messaging in company environments (#4902)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies. > - Company Environments is the operator-facing seam for choosing where compatible adapters execute work. > - Sandbox provider plugins such as E2B extend that seam, but they are not agent adapters themselves. > - The current Company Environments copy put adapter capability rows and sandbox-provider enablement on the same page without clearly distinguishing the two concepts. > - That made it look like installing the E2B sandbox provider caused a new adapter to appear under adapters. > - This pull request clarifies the UI language so provider plugins are described as backing the Sandbox driver rather than being adapter types. > - The benefit is a more accurate mental model for operators configuring environments and adapters. ## What Changed - Added explicit Company Environments copy stating that installed sandbox providers are not adapter types and instead back the Sandbox driver for compatible adapters. - Renamed the support-matrix column from `Sandbox` to `Sandbox via plugin` to make the provider relationship visible in the table itself. - Extended the existing environments UI test to assert the new clarification text. ## Verification - `pnpm test -- --run ui/src/pages/CompanySettings.test.tsx` Result: could not complete cleanly in this worktree because the checkout is missing its local workspace install links. - Direct Vitest fallback against `ui/src/pages/CompanySettings.test.tsx` Result: failed before test collection on local dependency resolution (`react/jsx-dev-runtime`), so there is no passing automated signal from this checkout. - Manual review Confirm the Company Environments page now says sandbox providers are not adapter types and labels the table column as `Sandbox via plugin`. ## Risks - Low risk. This is a copy-only UI clarification plus a matching test assertion; the main risk is wording drift if the product later decides sandbox providers should be surfaced differently. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex via the local `codex_local` Paperclip adapter. This run used tool-assisted code editing and shell execution. The exact backend model ID and context window are not exposed in the Paperclip run context for this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [ ] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [ ] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge |
||
|
Devin Foley
|
9b99d30330 |
Add dedicated environment settings page and test-in-environment (#4798)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies > - Agents run inside environments (local, SSH, E2B sandbox) > - Operators need to configure and manage these environments > - But environment settings were buried inside the general company settings page, making them hard to find > - Additionally, when testing an agent from the configuration form, the test always ran locally regardless of which environment was selected > - This PR moves environments into a dedicated top-level company settings section and wires the "Test Environment" button to run inside the selected environment > - The benefit is operators can find and manage environments more easily, and the test button now validates the actual environment the agent will use ## What Changed - Added a dedicated `CompanyEnvironments` settings page with its own route and sidebar entry - Updated `CompanySettingsSidebar` and `CompanySettingsNav` to include the new environments section - Modified the agent test route (`POST /agents/:id/test`) to accept an optional `environmentId` parameter - Updated all adapter `test.ts` handlers to resolve and use the specified execution target environment - Added `resolveTestExecutionTarget` to `execution-target.ts` for remote environment test resolution with cwd fallback - Moved the "Test Environment" button and its feedback display into the `NewAgent` page footer for better UX flow ## Verification - `pnpm test` — all existing and new tests pass - `pnpm typecheck` — clean - Manual: navigate to Company Settings, confirm "Environments" appears as a top-level section - Manual: configure an agent with a non-local environment, click "Test Environment", confirm the test runs inside that environment ## Risks - Low risk. UI-only routing change for the settings page. The test-in-environment change adds an optional parameter with a local fallback, so existing behavior is preserved when no environment is specified. ## Model Used Codex GPT 5.4 high via Paperclip. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge |