Arnike/paperclip
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
2,624 Commits 2 Branches 0 Tags
dbebf30c89ca6302b6ed6b36a484b4efe5cbc4e2
Commit Graph

490 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Dotta dbebf30c89 Add low-trust review containment (#7530) 
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is a control plane for AI-agent companies, so execution
policy and trust boundaries are part of the product's safety contract.
> - Low-trust review work needs narrower authority than normal
same-company agents because hostile PRs, comments, attachments, and
generated output can carry prompt-injection payloads.
> - The current V1 shape gives trusted workers broad company context,
which is useful for normal execution but too permissive for a reviewer
assigned to hostile content.
> - This branch adds a `low_trust_review` preset, source-trust tagging,
route-level containment, and quarantine handling so low-trust output
does not automatically flow into higher-trust wake context.
> - The branch has been rebased onto current `origin/master`, and the
low-trust migration was renumbered to `0097_low_trust_source_trust.sql`
to avoid collisions with existing `0091` through `0096` migrations.
> - Greptile feedback was addressed by tightening low-trust detection,
preserving project-level trust policy checks, fixing issue-kind
promotion lookup, removing duplicate post-lease isolation assertion,
documenting fail-closed source-trust behavior, bounding ancestry checks,
enforcing runtime issue context for CEOs, awaiting accepted-plan monitor
authorization, and making low-trust issue source-trust tagging atomic.
> - The benefit is a first production slice of deny-by-default review
containment with regression coverage for the main control-plane pivot
surfaces.

Fixes #7531.

## What Changed

- Added shared trust-policy types and validators, plus
database/source-trust fields for issues, comments, documents, and work
products.
- Implemented server enforcement for low-trust issue scope, agent
self-view redaction, secret/plugin/runtime denial paths, promotion
checks, and quarantined continuation/wake context.
- Added focused low-trust regression tests for resolver behavior, source
trust, route authorization, heartbeat preflight ordering, runtime
containment, and quarantine redaction.
- Added board UI affordances for selecting/reviewing the low-trust
preset and surfacing source-trust badges in relevant issue views.
- Added `doc/LOW-TRUST-PRESETS.md`, updated
`doc/SPEC-implementation.md`, and committed the low-trust review
contract plan under `doc/plans/`.
- Rebasing note: the original `0097_low_trust_source_trust.sql`
migration was renamed to `0097_low_trust_source_trust.sql`; the SQL uses
`ADD COLUMN IF NOT EXISTS` so users who already applied the old-numbered
migration are not broken by the renumbered migration.

## Verification

- Rebased branch onto current `origin/master` and force-pushed with
lease to `origin/PAP-10211-low-trust-agent` at head `2719f31e3`.
- Confirmed the PR diff does not include `pnpm-lock.yaml` or
`.github/workflows` changes.
- Resolved upstream UI/comment conflicts by preserving deleted-comment
tombstone behavior and low-trust source-trust badges/metadata.
- Renumbered the low-trust source-trust migration to
`0097_low_trust_source_trust.sql`; the SQL uses `ADD COLUMN IF NOT
EXISTS` so users who already applied an old-numbered copy are not
broken.
- `pnpm exec vitest run ui/src/lib/issue-chat-messages.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-workspace-session.test.ts`
- `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/source-trust.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/workspace-runtime-service-authz.test.ts
ui/src/lib/trust-policy-ui.test.ts
ui/src/components/TrustPresetSection.test.tsx`
- `pnpm run typecheck:build-gaps`
- `git diff --check`
- GitHub checks pass on head `2719f31e3`: build, typecheck/release
registry, general tests, serialized server suites, e2e, canary, verify,
policy/review, Socket, and Snyk.
- Greptile Review passes with Confidence Score 5/5 and zero unresolved
Greptile review threads.
- No design screenshots/images were added because the task explicitly
says not to add them unless they are specifically part of the work.

## Risks

- Medium risk: this touches shared trust-policy contracts, server
authorization paths, heartbeat context generation, migration metadata,
and UI preset controls.
- Low-trust containment is intentionally deny-by-default; legitimate
future review workflows may need explicit allowlisted exceptions.
- Plugin/runtime/security surfaces are broad, so regression tests cover
the current known routes but future integrations must route through the
same containment layer.
- The PR is ready for review; GitHub checks are green and Greptile is
5/5.

> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.

## Model Used

- OpenAI Codex, GPT-5 coding agent, tool-enabled shell and GitHub CLI
workflow.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] UI changes are covered by focused tests; no screenshots were added
per task instruction not to add design images unless specifically
required
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
 2026-06-05 16:48:02 -05:00
Dotta fff3832a01 [codex] Add teams catalog extraction (#7550) 
Fixes #7551

## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the control plane for AI-agent companies, and reusable
company/team setup is part of making those companies faster to launch.
> - The teams catalog work introduces app-shipped team templates that
can be browsed, previewed, and installed into a company.
> - Catalog installation crosses several contracts: bundled package
contents, shared API types, server import/install behavior, CLI
workflows, and the board UI.
> - Agents also need a safe path through catalog installs: scoped
company selection, explicit source policy, approval fallback for agent
creation, and preserved catalog provenance.
> - This pull request extracts the completed teams catalog branch into
one reviewable PR on top of `public-gh/master`.
> - The benefit is a reusable teams catalog foundation with server, CLI,
package, docs, and hidden UI surfaces kept in sync.

## What Changed

- Added the `@paperclipai/teams-catalog` package with bundled/optional
team definitions, generated manifest, validators, catalog builder tests,
and migration notes.
- Added shared teams catalog types/validators plus server routes and
services for listing, previewing, and installing catalog teams.
- Integrated catalog install with company portability, skill/source
policy checks, provenance metadata, origin hashes, target-manager
reparenting, and installed/out-of-date detection.
- Added CLI `teams` commands and agent-safe company selection behavior,
including `company current` and approval fallback for forbidden
agent-run installs.
- Added hidden Team Catalog UI/API/query surfaces, Storybook fixtures,
and targeted UI tests while keeping the UI route out of primary
navigation.
- Added docs for CLI/company/teams catalog behavior and removed
generated screenshot artifacts from the PR diff.

## Verification

- `pnpm exec vitest run cli/src/__tests__/company.test.ts
cli/src/__tests__/teams.test.ts
packages/teams-catalog/src/catalog-builder.test.ts
packages/teams-catalog/src/shipped-catalog.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/agent-permissions-service.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/company-portability.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/company-skills-service.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/teams-catalog-routes.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/teams-catalog-service.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/teams-catalog-install-no-overrides.test.ts
ui/src/lib/company-routes.test.ts ui/src/pages/TeamCard.test.tsx
ui/src/pages/TeamCatalog.test.tsx
ui/src/pages/useInstallTeamCatalogEntry.test.tsx`
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/shared typecheck && pnpm --filter
@paperclipai/teams-catalog typecheck && pnpm --filter paperclipai
typecheck && pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck && pnpm
--filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck`
- Confirmed branch is rebased onto `public-gh/master` (`78dc3625a`) and
`public-gh/master` is an ancestor of `HEAD`.
- Confirmed PR diff excludes `pnpm-lock.yaml`, `.github/workflows/*`,
generated screenshot images, and screenshot helper scripts.

## Risks

- Medium review surface: this crosses package generation, shared
contracts, server install behavior, CLI, docs, and hidden UI code.
- Catalog install behavior creates agents/projects/tasks/skills and must
keep company scoping, permissions, source policy, and provenance checks
strict.
- `pnpm-lock.yaml` is intentionally excluded per repo policy;
CI/default-branch automation owns lockfile refresh.
- The Team Catalog UI is included but hidden from primary navigation, so
future enablement should re-check visual QA before exposure.

> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.
>
> ROADMAP checked: this aligns with reusable companies/templates and
plugin-adjacent onboarding work. This PR packages work already developed
on the Paperclip task branch for review.

## Model Used

- OpenAI Codex, GPT-5 series coding agent in this Paperclip session;
exact runtime context window was not exposed. Used shell, git, `gh`, and
local test/typecheck tooling.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots, or documented why screenshots are intentionally omitted
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
 2026-06-05 12:55:49 -05:00
Dotta 3657854e5e Merge pull request #7554 from paperclipai/codex/pap-10343-comment-redaction 
[codex] Redact deleted issue comments
 2026-06-05 05:32:08 -10:00
Dotta 487361a5cc Merge pull request #7553 from paperclipai/codex/pap-10343-operator-qol-pr 
[codex] Group operator QoL fixes
 2026-06-05 05:29:56 -10:00
m.seomoon fb28cf38b4 fix(heartbeat): guard Hermes resume session state (#7516) 
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is a control plane for AI-agent companies
> - Heartbeats reuse adapter session state so agents can continue work
across wakeups
> - Hermes can only resume from full canonical session IDs, not
truncated display IDs
> - #6347 exposed a case where Paperclip could save invalid Hermes
output like `from`, or a shortened display ID, as resumable state
> - This pull request hardens the host-side Hermes resume path so
Paperclip only stores and reuses session IDs that can actually resume
> - The benefit is that Hermes wakeups no longer get stuck retrying bad
saved resume state

## What Changed

- Added Hermes-only validation for canonical session IDs in
`server/src/services/heartbeat.ts`.
- Stopped building Hermes resume params from truncated display IDs such
as `20260601_141558_`.
- For explicit resume-from-run wakeups, pulls the full Hermes session ID
from the run result payload after validation.
- Preserves the previous valid Hermes session state when a run fails,
times out, or is cancelled instead of replacing it with invalid adapter
output like `from`.
- Clears existing Hermes resume state that fails validation.
- Leaves non-Hermes adapter session behavior unchanged.
- Added regression coverage in
`server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-workspace-session.test.ts`.

Addresses #6347.

Supersedes #6351 and covers the full-session resume metadata handoff
from #7280.

## Verification

- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server exec vitest run
src/__tests__/heartbeat-workspace-session.test.ts` — passed, 50 tests.
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck` — passed.
- `pnpm -r typecheck` — passed.
- `pnpm build` — passed.
- `git diff --check` — clean.

Full suite did not finish green locally; the failures were outside this
server-only heartbeat path:

- `pnpm test:run`:
  - `@paperclipai/adapter-opencode-local` remote SSH tests timed out.
- `ui/src/pages/Inbox.test.tsx` failed once in `Inbox toolbar > syncs
hover with j/k selection on inbox rows`; the direct file rerun passed.
- `ui/src/components/IssueDocumentAnnotations.test.tsx` failed once in
`auto-opens the panel and focuses the thread when deep-linked`; the
direct file rerun passed.

## Risks

- Low risk: no schema, public API, shared contract, or UI changes.
- If Hermes changes its canonical session ID format, the validation
regex will need to be updated.
- Adapter-side parsing still needs its own fix; this PR prevents
non-resumable adapter output from becoming durable Paperclip resume
state.
- This does not add an immediate same-run retry after `Session not
found`; recovery happens by clearing or preserving durable resume state
for later wakeups.

> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.

## Model Used

- OpenAI GPT-5.5 (`openai/gpt-5.5`) via opencode, with repository
read/search tools and local shell/test execution. opencode did not
expose context-window or reasoning-mode details.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used, including exact model ID and
capability details
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have run tests locally — targeted checks passed; full `pnpm
test:run` had unrelated local failures disclosed above
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots — N/A, no UI changes
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes — N/A,
no user-facing docs or commands changed
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
 2026-06-04 22:45:25 -07:00
Dotta 9aa065a38c Make deleted-comment cleanup atomic 
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
 2026-06-05 03:56:39 +00:00
Dotta 1afa337841 Address Greptile deleted-comment feedback 
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
 2026-06-05 03:43:12 +00:00
Dotta af0c43b205 Address operator QoL review feedback 2026-06-05 03:40:46 +00:00
Dotta 39e0fba65f Filter issues by plan document 2026-06-05 03:28:07 +00:00
Dotta 4afe5ab7cb Add other answers to issue questions 2026-06-05 03:28:07 +00:00
Dotta f360fcbbb3 Expire confirmations after user comments 
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
 2026-06-05 03:28:07 +00:00
Dotta 7f70759e61 Redact deleted issue comments 2026-06-05 03:20:46 +00:00
Dotta 0cca059705 Address catalog review cleanup 
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
 2026-06-04 21:10:29 +00:00
Dotta bee2b25f5d Add referenced last30days catalog entry 2026-06-04 20:01:25 +00:00
Doyeon Baek d60f50e4a4 feat(routines): suppress scheduled ticks while project is paused (TON-2139) (#7502) 
Fixes #7501

## Thinking Path
Issue checkout already rejects paused projects (`issues.ts` → 409), but
that fires only *after* the routine execution issue exists. Per internal
TON-1102, the pause must be honored earlier — at the scheduler tick — so
no execution issue is ever created while a project is paused. The fix
gates dispatch in `tickScheduledTriggers` on the due routine's
`projects.pausedAt`, while preserving normal cron advancement so resume
does not backfill missed firings.

## What Changed
- `server/src/services/routines.ts`:
- `tickScheduledTriggers` LEFT JOINs `projects` and derives
`projectPaused` from `projects.pausedAt`. Routines with no project are
never suppressed.
- When paused: the tick is still claimed and `routineTriggers.nextRunAt`
advances by a single cron step (catch-up backfill bypassed while paused
— no replay on resume); `recordSuppressedScheduleRun` runs instead of
`dispatchRoutineRun`.
- New `recordSuppressedScheduleRun` inserts one `routine_runs` row
(`source: schedule`, `status: skipped`, `failureReason: paused`,
`linkedIssueId: null`, `completedAt` set), updates routine/trigger
touched state, and logs a `routine.run_skipped` activity entry.
- `nextResultText` gains a `skipped_paused` branch for pause-specific
audit text (does not overload the live-issue `skipped` text).
- `server/src/__tests__/routines-service.test.ts`: focused test proving
all four acceptance criteria (no issue created while paused; one
`skipped`/`paused`/null-link run; `nextRunAt` advanced; normal resume on
a later unpaused tick).

## Verification
```bash
pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server exec tsc --noEmit
npx vitest run server/src/__tests__/routines-service.test.ts
```
- The focused test in `routines-service.test.ts` proves all four
acceptance criteria: no execution issue is created while the project is
paused; exactly one `routine_runs` row is written with `source:
schedule` / `status: skipped` / `failureReason: paused` /
`linkedIssueId: null`; the trigger's `nextRunAt` advances by a single
cron step (missed firings are not backfilled); and a later tick after
the project is unpaused dispatches normally.

## Risks
- Catch-up backfill is intentionally bypassed while paused — missed
firings are **not** replayed on resume (specified no-backfill behavior).
- Scope is deliberately narrow: manual runs, webhook/API triggers,
routine-level paused status, workspace runtime start/stop,
`concurrencyPolicy`, and `catchUpPolicy` (beyond no-backfill) are
untouched.

## Model Used
claude-opus-4-8 (Paperclip CTO heartbeat)

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
 2026-06-04 08:28:26 -07:00
Devin Foley 93206f73fa fix: Stop archived companies from waking agents (#7478) 
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies
> - Each agent has a heartbeat scheduler that wakes it on timers and on
events; every wake spawns an adapter (Claude / Codex / …) run that bills
the operator's subscription
> - When an operator archives a company, the agents inside it remain in
invokable states — the heartbeat scheduler never consults company status
— so timers keep firing and event-driven wakes (comments, mentions,
blockers-resolved, etc.) keep cascading
> - On real deployments this silently drains the operator's
subscription: idle archived companies wake their CEOs hourly, plus any
cross-company event cascade
> - This pull request enforces "archived ⇒ never spawns a run" as a
structural invariant by guarding the wake path AND cascading agent state
on archive/reactivate
> - The benefit is that archived companies stop billing the operator,
and the UI/queue stays consistent with the invariant

## What Changed

- `server/src/services/heartbeat.ts`:
- `enqueueWakeup()` loads the company and short-circuits when status is
not `active`. Background sources (timer, automation, events) write a
`company.inactive` skipped wake and return `null`; explicit user invokes
throw a `conflict` so the UI surfaces the real reason.
- `tickTimers()` joins agents to active companies so the scheduler does
not iterate archived-company agents at all (no skip-row noise).
- `server/src/services/companies.ts`:
- `archive(id, actor?)` pauses runnable agents with `pauseReason =
"company_archived"` inside the transaction (preserving
`pending_approval`, `terminated`, and agents paused for unrelated
reasons), then cancels `queued`/`running` heartbeat runs after the
transaction commits.
- `update(id, data, actor?)` reverses the cascade only for agents whose
`pauseReason === "company_archived"` on the `archived → active`
transition; manually-paused agents stay paused.
- Both methods emit activity-log entries (`company.archived` with
`agentsPaused` + `runsCancelled`, `company.reactivated` with
`agentsRestored`) so the audit trail fires regardless of caller.
- `packages/shared/src/constants.ts` + `server/src/services/budgets.ts`:
add `company_archived` to the legal `PauseReason` union so the
restorable marker is a first-class value.
-
`packages/db/src/migrations/0094_backfill_archived_company_agent_pauses.sql`:
backfill so existing archived-company agents become `paused /
company_archived` (excludes `pending_approval`).
- `ui/src/lib/activity-format.ts`: add the `company.reactivated` label.

## Verification

- `npx vitest run src/__tests__/companies-service.test.ts` — archive
cascade, reactivate cascade, and activity-log entries (with counts) all
pass.
- `npx vitest run
src/__tests__/heartbeat-archived-company-guard.test.ts` — timer +
on-demand + event-wake paths all blocked for archived companies;
`company.inactive` skipped-wake row written; user-initiated wakes throw
`conflict`.
- `pnpm typecheck` — clean.
- Manual repro from the bug description: archive a company, wait an
interval / post a comment on one of its issues, observe zero new
heartbeat runs.

## Risks

- Migration `0094` is a single bulk UPDATE on `agents` joined to
archived `companies`. On large deployments it briefly holds row locks on
archived-company agent rows; should be quick because the predicate is
narrow (`status NOT IN (paused, terminated, pending_approval)` and
`companies.status = 'archived'`).
- New `pauseReason` value (`company_archived`) is opaque to older
clients that only know the previous union. Acceptable because the union
is read as plain text and the contract is sync'd in the same change.
- Behavior change for users: invoking an agent in an archived company
now fails with a conflict instead of silently spawning a run. Intended.

## Model Used

- Claude (Anthropic) — model `claude-opus-4-7` ("Opus 4.7"), Claude Code
CLI, with tool use (Read/Edit/Bash/Grep). No extended thinking mode.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [ ] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots — N/A, no UI changes beyond an activity-log label string
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

## Related Work

Fixes #1348 (`[Bug] Archived companies still running heartbeats and
consuming tokens`).

Prior attempts and parallel work in this area:

- #1365 and #1429 by @hungdqdesign (March 2026) — both closed without
merging. Same three-layer shape (`tickTimers` / `enqueueWakeup` /
`resumeQueuedRuns` + archive-route cancellation) targeting #1348. Credit
for first publicly proposing the wake-path-guard approach.
- #5865 by @stubbi (May 2026, open) — adds the same `companies.status !=
'archived'` joins to `tickTimers`, `enqueueWakeup`, `resumeQueuedRuns`,
**and** routines `tickScheduledTriggers`, bundled with plugin-table
tenant isolation (`plugin_entities` / `plugin_job_runs` / `plugin_logs`
/ `plugin_webhook_deliveries` get a `companyId` FK with `ON DELETE
CASCADE`). This PR is narrower — it does not touch routines or plugin
tables — but adds the **archive cascade** (pause agents with
`pauseReason = "company_archived"`), the **reactivate reverse**
(un-pause only that subset), the **`company_archived` pause-reason
marker**, and a **backfill migration** for pre-existing archived
companies, which #5865 does not include. Happy to coordinate sequencing
or rebase if #5865 lands first.
 2026-06-03 21:07:14 -07:00
Ramon-nassa 62863126a3 fix(plugin-tool-dispatcher): propagate pluginDbId so worker.isRunning resolves (#5671) 
Fixes #2391
Fixes #3394
Fixes #4094
Fixes #5501
Fixes #5916
Fixes #6215
Fixes #6514

## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies
> - Plugins extend the platform by registering agent-callable tools
backed by long-running worker processes
> - `PluginToolDispatcher` is the boundary between the HTTP
`/api/plugins/tools/execute` route and `PluginWorkerManager`, which owns
those worker processes
> - `PluginWorkerManager` keys live workers by the plugin's **database
UUID**, but `plugin-loader` was registering tools using only `pluginKey`
— so every tool call did `workerManager.isRunning(pluginKey)` and always
got `false`
> - As a result, every `POST /api/plugins/tools/execute` against a
tool-exposing plugin returned 502 `worker for plugin X is not running`,
even though the worker process was alive (hit in production by
`vexion.council-chat`; `mem0-sync` would be next)
> - This pull request threads the DB UUID through the dispatcher →
registry hop and hardens the contract so omitting the UUID is a
compile-time error, not a silent fallback
> - The benefit is plugin tool execution actually works for any plugin
declaring `manifest.tools[]`, and the type system prevents the same bug
from recurring

## What Changed

- `server/src/services/plugin-loader.ts` — pass in-scope `pluginId` (DB
UUID) as the third argument to `toolDispatcher.registerPluginTools`.
Single-line root fix.
- `server/src/services/plugin-tool-dispatcher.ts` —
`registerPluginTools` now takes `pluginDbId: string` (required, was
optional). JSDoc updated to document the worker-routing contract and why
the optional signature masked the bug.
- `server/src/services/plugin-tool-registry.ts` — `registerPlugin`
throws on missing/empty `pluginDbId` so any new call site that forgets
the UUID fails immediately rather than silently falling back to
`pluginKey`.
- `server/src/__tests__/plugin-tool-dispatcher-pluginDbId.test.ts` — new
focused regression suite covering the activation path, disable→enable
lifecycle, worker re-spawn, and the empty-UUID guard.

## Verification

- `pnpm vitest run
server/src/__tests__/plugin-tool-dispatcher-pluginDbId.test.ts` — 6/6
passing.
- `pnpm vitest run server/src/__tests__/plugin-database.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/plugin-routes-authz.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/plugin-lifecycle-restart.test.ts` — 48/48 passing
on the merge commit.
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck` — no new errors
introduced by these files.
- Manual repro path:
1. Install a plugin that declares `manifest.tools[]` and uses
`runWorker`.
2. Confirm status `ready` and a live worker (`paperclipai plugin
diagnostics <key>`).
3. `POST /api/plugins/tools/execute` with `{ tool:
"<pluginKey>:<toolName>", parameters, runContext }`.
4. Pre-fix: HTTP 502, `worker for plugin <key> is not running`.
Post-fix: tool dispatches normally.

## Risks

- Low risk. The signature tightening (`pluginDbId?` → `pluginDbId`) is a
back-compatible behavioral fix at the only production call site
(`plugin-loader`), which already had the UUID in scope.
- Test/recovery paths that previously omitted the UUID must now supply
it; the new error message identifies the missing arg explicitly.
- No database migration, no API/schema change, no plugin-author-facing
change.
- The merge commit pulls master into the PR branch additively (no
rebase); reviewers can read the fix commits independently of the merge.

## Model Used

- Provider/model: Anthropic Claude (Opus 4.7, `claude-opus-4-7`) for the
additive merge-conflict resolution, PR description rewrite, and Greptile
follow-up; original fix authored by
[@Ramon-nassa](https://github.com/Ramon-nassa).
- Capabilities used: tool use (file edit, shell, GitHub CLI), extended
thinking off, no code execution by the model.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [ ] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots (N/A — server-only change)
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---

## Original Summary (preserved from contributor)

`plugin-loader` activates plugins and calls

```ts
toolDispatcher.registerPluginTools(pluginKey, manifest)
```

with only two args. `PluginToolDispatcher.registerPluginTools` forwards
them to `registry.registerPlugin(pluginKey, manifest)`. The registry
falls back `pluginDbId ?? pluginKey`, but `PluginWorkerManager` keys
live workers by the DB UUID — so the downstream

```ts
workerManager.isRunning(pluginKey)   // always false
```

causes every `POST /api/plugins/tools/execute` to fail with `worker for
plugin X is not running`, even when the worker process is alive and
healthy. **This hits every plugin that exposes tools** (we hit it in
`vexion.council-chat`; `mem0-sync` would too).

Reported-by: Vexion / Ramon Nassar (vexion.council-chat plugin, MO-068).

---------

Co-authored-by: ramon nassar <ramon@tabs.co>
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Devin Foley <devin@devinfoley.com>
Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
 2026-06-03 19:13:21 -07:00
Aron Prins 70b1a9109d Improve CLI API parity coverage (#6626) 
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is a control plane for AI-agent companies, with the CLI
acting as a scriptable operator and agent interface to that control
plane.
> - The REST API surface has grown across companies, agents, issues,
routines, plugins, auth, workspaces, secrets, and operational inspection
commands.
> - The CLI had drifted from that API surface: some commands were
missing, some command shapes differed from docs/reference material, and
several edge cases only failed during end-to-end local-source testing.
> - The local development runbook requires these tests to be disposable
and isolated from a real `~/.paperclip`, `~/.codex`, or `~/.claude`
installation.
> - This pull request adds broad CLI/API parity coverage, fixes the
actionable bugs found during that pass, and records the reproducible
test log under `doc/logs`.
> - The benefit is a more complete, scriptable CLI surface with
regression coverage for the command families exercised by the parity
run.

## What Changed

- Added or expanded CLI command coverage for access/auth, companies,
agents, projects, goals, issues and subresources, routines, plugins,
workspaces, activity/run/cost/dashboard inspection, assets, skills,
secrets, tokens, prompt/wake flows, and local setup helpers.
- Fixed CLI/API parity bugs found during the run, including context
profile patching, issue interaction optional payloads, malformed
tree-hold errors, environment duplicate handling, configure
invalid-section exit codes, worktree pnpm invocation, token agent ID
resolution, plugin tool worker lookup, and routine webhook secret
cleanup.
- Added missing CLI wrappers and route coverage for health/access,
invite resolution URL forwarding, join status normalization, secret
lifecycle commands, LLM docs routes, available-skill isolation, positive
board-claim coverage, and interactive `connect` prompt-flow tests.
- Added a schema-backed `/api/openapi.json` route sufficient for CLI
parity and `paperclipai openapi --json` smoke coverage.
- Added `doc/logs/2026-05-24-cli-api-parity-e2e-log.md` with the
detailed living test/bug log and renamed the log directory from
`doc/bugs` to `doc/logs`.
- Added `doc/plans/2026-05-23-cli-api-parity.md` and the OpenAPI parity
reference used during the pass.

OpenAPI note: this PR intentionally does not try to subsume
`feature/openapi-spec`. The OpenAPI implementation here is schema-backed
and better than the earlier route-inventory stub, but
`feature/openapi-spec` is the fuller/better OpenAPI branch because it
includes exact mounted-route coverage tests and additional current route
coverage. That branch should stay as its own PR and can supersede this
OpenAPI route implementation.

## Verification

Targeted automated checks run:

- `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/openapi-routes.test.ts`
- `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/board-claim.test.ts`
- `pnpm exec vitest run cli/src/__tests__/connect.test.ts`
- `pnpm exec vitest run cli/src/__tests__/agent-lifecycle.test.ts`
- `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/plugin-database.test.ts`
- `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/routines-service.test.ts`
- `pnpm --dir cli typecheck`
- `pnpm --dir server typecheck`

Manual/local E2E verification:

- Ran the full disposable local-source CLI/API parity pass with isolated
`PAPERCLIP_HOME`, `PAPERCLIP_CONFIG`, `PAPERCLIP_CONTEXT`,
`PAPERCLIP_AUTH_STORE`, `CODEX_HOME`, and `CLAUDE_HOME` under
`tmp/cli-api-parity`.
- Verified `DATABASE_URL` and `DATABASE_MIGRATION_URL` stayed unset for
the scratch server.
- Verified live health and schema-backed OpenAPI responses on
non-default port `3197`.
- Revoked created board/agent tokens and cleaned up temporary plugins,
secrets, non-default environments, and project workspaces.
- See `doc/logs/2026-05-24-cli-api-parity-e2e-log.md` for the full
command-by-command reproduction log.

Not run:

- Full `pnpm test`, `pnpm test:run`, or `pnpm build` were not run after
the entire branch because the branch is broad and the parity pass used
focused test/typecheck verification plus live isolated CLI reruns.

## Risks

- This is a broad PR and touches many CLI command modules, so review
surface is high. The changes are grouped around one theme, but a split
may be easier if maintainers prefer narrower PRs.
- The OpenAPI route in this PR is not the final/best OpenAPI
implementation. `feature/openapi-spec` has stronger exact-route coverage
and should remain the source for the dedicated OpenAPI PR.
- The living log is intentionally detailed and large. It is useful for
reproducibility but adds documentation weight.
- No UI changes are intended; screenshots are not applicable.

> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.

## Model Used

- OpenAI Codex, GPT-5-based coding agent in Codex desktop. Exact served
model/context-window identifier was not exposed in the local app. Work
used shell/Git/GitHub CLI tooling, local source inspection, targeted
test execution, and live isolated Paperclip CLI/API smoke testing.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Devin Foley <devin@devinfoley.com>
 2026-06-02 17:13:29 -07:00
aperim-agent d58a862549 fix(issues): coerce anchor.createdAt to Date before postgres binding (PRO-3144) (#5220) 
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents in a control plane backed by
Postgres + drizzle-orm
> - `listComments` is the cursor-paginated comment listing on the issues
service; the cursor branch uses Drizzle's `gt`/`lt`/`eq` against
`issueComments.createdAt`
> - On postgres.js v3.4.8, passing a `Date` instance through the
comparison helpers triggers `TypeError [ERR_INVALID_ARG_TYPE]: The
"string" argument must be of type string or an instance of Buffer or
ArrayBuffer. Received an instance of Date`
> - The driver's binding path expects a Date constructed via the
standard runtime, but drizzle's `select` returns instances that don't
satisfy that check in this version
> - This PR coerces `anchor.createdAt` through `toISOString()` → `new
Date(...)` so the comparison helpers always receive a binding-safe Date,
then folds in a follow-up that hoists the Date into a single allocation
reused across all four `gt`/`lt`/`eq` call sites
> - The benefit is `listComments` cursor pagination stops 500-ing on Pg
v3.4.8 with one Date allocation per call instead of four, exercised by
both ascending and descending cursor tests

## What Changed

- `server/src/services/issues.ts` — coerce `anchor.createdAt` to a
binding-safe `Date` once and reuse the same instance across all four
cursor comparisons (`gt` / `lt` / `eq`)
- `server/src/__tests__/issues-service.test.ts` — add an
ascending-cursor sibling test so both `gt` and `lt` cursor paths are
exercised; the existing descending test continues to pass

## Verification

```bash
# Both cursor branches
pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server exec vitest run \
  src/__tests__/issues-service.test.ts -t "anchor comment"
# → 2 passed, 41 skipped

# Production smoke
curl -s "$PAPERCLIP_API_URL/api/issues/<issueId>/comments?after=<commentId>&order=asc" \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $PAPERCLIP_API_KEY"
# Expect: JSON array, no 500 TypeError
```

## Risks

- Low risk. Pure cursor-pagination internals in `listComments`; no
schema, migration, or external contract changes
- Drizzle's `gt`/`lt`/`eq` continue to receive a `Date` for the
timestamp column, producing the same bound parameter as before
- Behavioural surface is exercised by ascending + descending cursor
tests against a real Postgres test database

## Model Used

- Claude Opus 4.7 (`claude-opus-4-7`), no extended-thinking mode, used
for the hoist+test follow-up commit

## Fixes

Closes #2612, Closes #3661, Closes #3830

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [ ] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots — n/a, backend-only
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes — n/a,
no docs touched
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Elena Voronova <elena@paperclip.ing>
Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
Co-authored-by: Devin Foley <devin@devinfoley.com>
 2026-06-02 15:26:59 -07:00
Devin Foley 911a1e8b0d Fix continuation recovery retry streaks by failure cause (#7031) 
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies.
> - The recovery subsystem is responsible for keeping assigned work
moving when a live heartbeat run disappears or fails.
> - `continuation_recovery` is the path that re-enqueues stranded
`in_progress` issues after an interrupted continuation attempt.
> - That path recently gained cause-aware retry classes and transient
retry caps, but the streak counter was still aggregating mixed failure
causes into one retry history.
> - That meant a sequence like `timeout -> timeout -> adapter_failed ->
adapter_failed` could escalate as a false `3x adapter_failed` streak
even though the latest cause had only happened twice.
> - This pull request makes continuation retry streaks count only
consecutive failures whose `errorCode` matches the latest run and adds a
regression test for the mixed-cause case.
> - The benefit is that transient retry backoff and escalation now match
the actual current failure cause instead of inheriting stale budget from
unrelated failures.

## What Changed

- Updated `summarizeRecentContinuationRetries(...)` to stop counting as
soon as the continuation failure cause no longer matches the latest
run's `errorCode`.
- Wired the continuation recovery escalation/backoff path to pass the
latest classified `errorCode` into the retry streak summarizer.
- Added a regression test proving mixed-cause continuation failures do
not consume the transient retry cap for a new failure cause.

## Verification

- `pnpm exec vitest run
server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-process-recovery.test.ts`

## Risks

- Low risk. The behavioral change is intentionally narrow, but any
future continuation retry modes that rely on `errorCode = null` will now
be counted as a separate streak bucket and should be kept in mind when
adding new retry classifications.

## Model Used

- OpenAI Codex via Paperclip `codex_local` (GPT-5-based Codex coding
agent; exact backend revision is not surfaced in the runtime), with tool
use, shell execution, and patch application in the local repository.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [ ] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots
- [ ] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
 2026-05-29 19:48:59 -07:00
Devin Foley 1f70fd9a22 PAPA-430: workspace finalize gates + no-remote-git enforcement (#6969) 
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents across isolated execution
workspaces; the local cwd is the only persistence boundary between runs.
> - Workspace lifecycle (worktree_prepare → execute →
workspace_finalize) and the wake/accept flow are what guarantee that
dependent issues see a consistent worktree.
> - PAPA-380 / PAPA-431 / PAPA-432 / PAPA-440 surfaced three holes in
that contract: silent env reuse across assignees, dependent wakes firing
before finalize, and `issue.interaction.accept` advancing before
finalize landed.
> - PAPA-441 / PAPA-442 then needed to document the "no remote git"
contract and prevent future adapter/runtime code from quietly
reintroducing `git push` as a backdoor sync.
> - This pull request lands those server fixes, the static
`check-no-git-push` enforcement, the AUTHORING.md cross-link, and the
Cody-review follow-ups on the PAPA-430 thread.
> - The benefit is that finalize is a real barrier — board accepts,
dependent wakes, and operator-set env all respect it — and adapter code
can't bypass it via raw `git push`.

## What Changed

- **server (PAPA-380, PAPA-431):** `execution-workspace-policy` refuses
silent env reuse when the assignee's resolved env disagrees with the
workspace it would inherit. The inheritance protection is now scoped to
the actual inheritance signal — explicit issue-level `environmentId` is
honored even when the agent's default env is `null`.
- **server (PAPA-432):** `heartbeat.ts` gates dependent wakes on
`listUnfinalizedExecutionWorkspaceIds`, and writes a
`workspace_finalize` row on the succeeded path. Write failures now
surface instead of being swallowed so dependents aren't silently
stranded behind a missing row.
- **server (PAPA-440):** `issue-thread-interactions.acceptInteraction`
adds a workspace_finalize precondition for `request_confirmation` (not
`suggest_tasks`). Accept returns 409 if finalize hasn't succeeded for
the latest workspace operation.
- **ci (PAPA-442):** new `scripts/check-no-git-push.mjs` static check
scans `packages/adapters/`, `packages/adapter-utils/`, `server/src/`,
and `cli/src/` for any `git push` invocation (string or args-array).
Wired into the `policy` PR job and `test:release-registry`. Operators
can opt in per-call with `// paperclip:allow-git-push: <reason>`.
Release scripts are out of scope by design.
- **docs (PAPA-441):** `AUTHORING.md` documents the no-remote-git
contract and cross-links the static check so adapter authors learn the
rule and the enforcement together.
- **review follow-up (PAPA-430, Cody):** three fixes — env resolver bug,
accept-gate scope (request_confirmation only), and finalize record write
on the succeeded path.

## Verification

- `pnpm exec vitest run
server/src/__tests__/execution-workspace-policy.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/issue-thread-interactions-service.test.ts` → 33/33
pass
- `node scripts/check-no-git-push.test.mjs` → check covers string form,
args-array form, comment exclusions, and per-line allow-comment.
- Manual: server compiles; the policy job runs the check in <1s before
heavier jobs.

## Risks

- **Behavioral shift in accept:** boards accepting
`request_confirmation` while finalize is in-flight now get 409s. This is
intentional — they can retry — but it changes timing on a hot path.
`suggest_tasks` is unaffected.
- **Workspace policy:** the env-reuse refusal is a new error path.
Issues that previously silently reused an env from a different-assignee
workspace will now fail-loud; the resolver still honors explicit
issue-level `executionWorkspaceSettings.environmentId`.
- **CI rule:** any future legitimate `git push` in scoped dirs must be
marked with the allow-comment, which is the intended ergonomic.

## Model Used

- Claude Opus 4.7 (`claude-opus-4-7`, extended thinking), via Claude
Code in the Paperclip executor adapter.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [ ] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots (N/A — server/CI/docs only)
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

Closes related issues: PAPA-430, PAPA-380, PAPA-431, PAPA-432, PAPA-440,
PAPA-441, PAPA-442

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
 2026-05-29 08:25:29 -07:00
Devin Foley d9f91576a0 Add accepted-plan decomposition exact-once guards and UI state (#6831) 
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies, so
planning approvals and child-issue fan-out are part of the core
control-plane loop.
> - Accepted plans are supposed to be a safe bridge from planning into
execution, especially when agents wake from review decisions and reuse
isolated workspaces.
> - The duplicate-subtask incident showed that an accepted plan revision
could be interpreted more than once across overlapping runs, which broke
the single-source-of-truth model for issue decomposition.
> - Fixing that required tightening the backend contract first:
accepted-plan decomposition needs an exact-once fingerprint, durable
claim state, and retry-safe child creation.
> - Once that backend behavior existed, the board still needed
visibility into what happened, so the issue detail view needed a
dedicated decomposition section instead of forcing operators to
reconstruct child creation from raw activity.
> - This pull request adds the exact-once decomposition primitive,
hardens wake routing and regressions around the incident, and surfaces
decomposition state in the UI so future incidents are both prevented and
easier to inspect.

## What Changed

- Added accepted-plan decomposition semantics to
`doc/execution-semantics.md`, including the exact-once fingerprint,
durable claim/result expectations, and retry/resume behavior.
- Added persistent accepted-plan decomposition claims in the backend,
including schema, shared types/validators, service logic, and issue
routes for creating and listing decomposition state.
- Hardened heartbeat routing so an accepted-plan continuation stays
scoped to the relevant planning issue instead of opportunistically
re-decomposing another accepted issue on the same assignee.
- Added regression coverage for the original failure modes: concurrent
same-parent retries, cross-issue accepted-plan isolation, and partial
child recreation under the same fingerprint.
- Added the `Plan decomposition` issue-detail section plus supporting
API/query-key/activity formatting updates so operators can see revision
status, owner, child counts, and the linked child issues directly in the
UI.
- Included the small follow-up UI fix so the decomposition section still
renders when the issue work mode is no longer `planning`.

## Verification

- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck`
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck`
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/db typecheck`
- `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/issues-service.test.ts`
- `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/issues-service.test.ts -t
"lists persisted decompositions with child issue summaries"`
- `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/issues-service.test.ts -t
"accepted plan decomposition"
server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-accepted-plan-workspace-refresh.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-context-summary.test.ts`
- Manual UI path: create a planning issue without an isolated execution
workspace, add a `plan` document, accept the `request_confirmation`, let
Paperclip create child issues, then reopen the parent issue detail page
and confirm the `Plan decomposition` section shows the accepted
revision, status, idempotent-claim badge, and child links.
- Separate follow-up bug noted during manual UI validation: accepting a
plan on an issue whose run never records `workspace_finalize` is tracked
in `PAPA-445` and is not part of this PR’s fix scope.

## Risks

- This adds a new migration and a large Drizzle snapshot update;
reviewers should confirm the schema shape and generated metadata match
the intended decomposition table.
- The exact-once claim changes sit on the accepted-plan fan-out path, so
regressions there could block legitimate child creation or mis-handle
retries if the claim state machine is wrong.
- The new UI only appears when decomposition records exist; reviewers
should use the manual verification path above rather than expecting
existing issues on a stale local instance to show the section
automatically.
- `PAPA-445` remains an open follow-up for the `workspace_finalize`
accept gate when a planning handoff never records finalize; that bug can
interfere with reproducing the UI flow on isolated workspaces but does
not change the correctness of the exact-once decomposition feature
itself.

> Checked `ROADMAP.md`: this PR is a bug fix / control-plane hardening
change for accepted-plan decomposition, not a new uncoordinated roadmap
feature.

## Model Used

- OpenAI Codex via Paperclip `codex_local` (GPT-5-based coding agent;
exact backend model ID/context window not exposed in the run context),
with repository tool use, shell execution, and code-editing
capabilities.

<img width="806" height="1069" alt="Screenshot 2026-05-27 at 11 05
48 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/5b00b670-96cd-4470-b0a3-581743bcae28"
/>


## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
 2026-05-28 23:30:18 -07:00
Dotta 9eac727cf1 [codex] Add skills CLI and catalog management (#6782) 
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies through
company-scoped control-plane workflows.
> - Agents need reusable, inspectable skills that can be installed,
reset, audited, exported, and assigned without bespoke local setup.
> - The existing skill truth model needed cleanup so bundled skills,
optional catalog skills, runtime skills, and adapter-provided skills
have clear provenance.
> - Operators also need a practical CLI and board UI for discovering and
managing company skills.
> - This pull request adds the skills CLI, packaged skills catalog,
company skills APIs, and catalog-aware board UI.
> - The benefit is a more reusable Paperclip company setup where skills
are portable, auditable, and easier for operators and agents to manage.

## What Changed

- Added `paperclipai skills` CLI commands and coverage for catalog
listing, installing, resetting, and inspecting company skills.
- Added a packaged `@paperclipai/skills-catalog` workspace with bundled
and optional skill content plus validation/build tests.
- Added shared company-skill types and validators used across CLI,
server, and UI contracts.
- Added server catalog APIs/services for company skill catalog
operations, reset semantics, audit behavior, and portability provenance.
- Updated adapter skill handling so runtime/catalog provenance remains
explicit across local adapters.
- Added board UI support for browsing and managing catalog-backed
company skills.
- Updated docs for the skills CLI/catalog flow and the company skills
Paperclip skill reference.
- Rebased the branch onto current `paperclipai/paperclip:master`; no
`pnpm-lock.yaml`, `.github/workflows`, or migration files are included
in the final PR diff.

## Verification

- Passed: `pnpm run preflight:workspace-links && pnpm exec vitest run
cli/src/__tests__/skills.test.ts
packages/skills-catalog/src/catalog-builder.test.ts
packages/skills-catalog/src/shipped-catalog.test.ts
packages/shared/src/validators/company-skill.test.ts
packages/adapter-utils/src/server-utils.test.ts
packages/plugins/create-paperclip-plugin/src/entrypoints.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/company-skills-catalog-service.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/company-skills-routes.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/company-portability.test.ts`.
- Passed: `pnpm exec vitest run
server/src/__tests__/workspace-runtime.test.ts -t "default
branch|origin/master|symbolic-ref"`.
- Attempted: full `server/src/__tests__/workspace-runtime.test.ts`. Four
provisioning tests failed while seeding an isolated worktree database
from the local Paperclip instance because the local plugin schema dump
contains a duplicate-column foreign key
(`plugin_content_machine_18a7bc327b.content_case_signals`). The
default-branch tests touched by the rebase conflict passed in the
focused run above.
- Checked final diff: no `pnpm-lock.yaml`, no `.github/workflows`, and
no migration-file changes relative to `master`.

## Risks

- Medium: this is a broad skills/catalog change touching CLI, server
APIs, shared contracts, adapter skill sync, and UI.
- Catalog validation and reset semantics need careful reviewer attention
because they affect reusable company setup and portability.
- No database migrations are included in this PR, so there is no
migration ordering/idempotency risk in the final diff.
- No lockfile is included by design; dependency resolution will be
handled by the repository lockfile workflow.

## Model Used

- OpenAI Codex coding agent based on GPT-5, running in Paperclip via the
`codex_local` adapter with shell, git, GitHub CLI, and code-editing tool
access. Exact hosted model build/context-window metadata is not exposed
in this runtime.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have run targeted tests locally and documented the local
workspace-runtime seed failure above
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] If this change affects the UI, screenshots were intentionally
omitted per PAP-10124 instructions; UI behavior is covered by tests and
reviewer inspection
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
 2026-05-28 07:33:51 -10:00
Dotta b7545823be [codex] Add document annotations and comments (#6733) 
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip orchestrates AI-agent companies through issues, documents,
runs, and durable company-scoped state.
> - Issue documents are where agents and operators capture plans,
handoffs, and work products.
> - Before this change, document collaboration could only happen through
whole-document edits and detached issue comments.
> - Inline document annotations need stable anchors, revision-aware
persistence, and UI affordances that do not break existing document
editing.
> - This pull request adds company-scoped document annotation threads,
comments, anchor snapshots, API routes, and board UI.
> - The benefit is that operators and agents can discuss specific
document passages without losing context as documents evolve.

## What Changed

- Added document annotation tables, schema exports, shared types,
validators, anchor hashing, and text-anchor helpers.
- Added server-side document annotation services and issue routes for
listing, creating, commenting, resolving, and reopening annotation
threads.
- Included annotation summaries in relevant issue document reads and
backup/recovery document workspace behavior.
- Added React UI for inline document highlights, comment panels, mobile
sheet behavior, deep-link focus, and resolved/open filtering.
- Added annotation design artifacts, Storybook coverage, screenshots,
and a screenshot helper script.
- Rebased the branch onto current `paperclipai/paperclip` `master` and
renumbered the annotation migration from `0085_old_swarm` to
`0091_old_swarm`; the SQL uses `IF NOT EXISTS` guards so environments
that previously applied the old migration number can safely apply the
new one.
- Adjusted the new annotation UI tests to use a local async flush helper
because this workspace's React 19.2.4 export does not expose
`React.act`.

## Verification

- `pnpm run preflight:workspace-links && pnpm exec vitest run
packages/shared/src/document-anchors.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/document-annotation-routes.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/document-annotations-service.test.ts
ui/src/components/DocumentAnnotationLayer.test.tsx
ui/src/components/IssueDocumentAnnotations.test.tsx
ui/src/lib/document-annotation-hash.test.ts
ui/src/lib/document-annotation-selection.test.ts`
- Confirmed `git diff --check` passes.
- Confirmed no `pnpm-lock.yaml` or `.github/workflows/*` files are
included in the PR diff.

## Risks

- Medium risk: this adds new persisted annotation tables and routes
across db/shared/server/ui.
- Migration risk is reduced by moving the branch migration to
`0091_old_swarm` after upstream `0090_resource_memberships` and keeping
the SQL idempotent for old `0085_old_swarm` adopters.
- UI risk is mostly around text range anchoring and panel positioning
across long documents, folded content, and mobile layouts; the PR
includes focused unit coverage and design screenshots.

> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.

## Model Used

- OpenAI Codex, GPT-5 coding agent, tool-using software engineering
mode. Context window size is not exposed in this Paperclip runtime.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
 2026-05-26 06:41:23 -07:00
Dotta f0ddd24d61 [codex] Show bundled plugins in plugin manager (#6734) 
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies.
> - The plugin system is how Paperclip exposes optional capabilities and
integrations without bloating the control plane.
> - Operators need the Instance Settings plugin manager to show both
installed external plugins and bundled built-in plugins.
> - Bundled plugins were available in the server/UI surface but were not
represented consistently in the plugin manager list.
> - Workspace runtime reuse also needed to stay pinned to the current
branch/base so the plugin manager can be validated from the intended
checkout.
> - This pull request shows bundled plugins in the manager, marks
experimental bundled plugins clearly, and tightens runtime/worktree
reuse guards.
> - The benefit is that operators can discover bundled plugins from the
same management screen as installed plugins without stale workspace
sessions hiding the latest branch state.

## What Changed

- Lists bundled monorepo plugin packages through the plugin routes API,
including plugin status and install metadata needed by the UI.
- Updates the plugin manager UI/API client to render bundled plugins and
display experimental badges based on installed plugin records.
- Adds server authorization coverage around plugin routes so board and
agent access stay company-scoped.
- Guards execution workspace/runtime reuse against stale base refs and
defaults new worktrees to the fetched target base.
- Expands workspace runtime tests for service reuse, stale workspace
prevention, and controlled runtime stops.
- Addressed Greptile feedback by respecting `origin/HEAD`, using async
cached bundled-plugin discovery, and avoiding duplicated UI experimental
plugin lists.

## Verification

- `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/plugin-routes-authz.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/workspace-runtime.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-workspace-session.test.ts`
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck`
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/plugin-sdk build && pnpm --filter
@paperclipai/server typecheck`
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck`
- `gh pr checks 6734 --repo paperclipai/paperclip` reports all checks
passing on `10e1ba9e0f505637cd913713fb28c2c99ae92011`.
- Greptile Review reports 5/5 on
`10e1ba9e0f505637cd913713fb28c2c99ae92011`.
- Confirmed the branch is rebased onto `public-gh/master` and the PR
diff does not include `pnpm-lock.yaml` or `.github/workflows` changes.
- UI screenshots were not captured in this PR-creation pass because the
available local board runtime is authenticated; the visible UI path is
covered by the plugin manager code changes and server/API tests above.

## Risks

- Medium risk: this touches shared plugin listing behavior and workspace
runtime reuse, so regressions could affect plugin manager visibility or
service reuse across execution workspaces.
- No database migrations.
- No lockfile or GitHub workflow changes.

> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.

## Model Used

- OpenAI GPT-5 Codex, coding-agent workflow with shell/tool use in a
local Paperclip worktree. Context window not surfaced by the runtime;
reasoning mode not externally reported.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [ ] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
 2026-05-26 07:32:45 -06:00
Dotta 9aea3e3d35 [codex] Add resource membership controls (#6677) 
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip orchestrates AI-agent companies through company-scoped
issues, projects, agents, and board-visible workflows.
> - The board sidebar and project list are the daily navigation surface
for that control plane.
> - Users need to keep all projects and agents accessible while hiding
resources they have intentionally left from their own sidebar.
> - That requires user-scoped resource membership state backed by
company-scoped API and database contracts.
> - The branch also needed to preserve HTTP worktree login sessions and
keep the project list easier to scan after membership grouping.
> - This pull request adds resource membership controls, sidebar leave
actions, grouped/sortable project listings, and focused tests.
> - The benefit is a cleaner personal workspace view without weakening
company-scoped access to the underlying project or agent detail pages.

## What Changed

- Added `project_memberships` and `agent_memberships` tables with
API/shared/server contracts for current-user join/leave state.
- Renumbered the membership migration to `0090_resource_memberships`
after rebasing onto current `master`, and made it idempotent for anyone
who had applied the old branch-local `0087` migration.
- Added project and agent sidebar leave actions, plus list filtering
that waits for membership state before hiding resources.
- Added grouped project listing, project sorting controls, and reserved
row subtitle height for cleaner scanning.
- Fixed HTTP auth cookie security handling so HTTP worktree sessions can
persist.
- Updated focused server and UI tests for the new membership, sidebar,
project list, and auth behavior.

## Verification

- `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/better-auth.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/resource-memberships-routes.test.ts
ui/src/pages/Projects.test.tsx
ui/src/components/SidebarProjects.test.tsx
ui/src/components/SidebarAgents.test.tsx
ui/src/components/MembershipAction.test.tsx
ui/src/components/EntityRow.test.tsx`
- Confirmed the branch is rebased on current `origin/master`.
- Confirmed the PR diff does not include `pnpm-lock.yaml` or
`.github/workflows` changes.

## Risks

- Migration safety: low to medium. The migration now uses `IF NOT
EXISTS` / guarded constraints and is numbered after current master
migrations, but it should still get CI coverage against fresh databases.
- UI behavior: low. Left resources are hidden from sidebar only after
membership state loads; direct detail access remains available.
- Auth behavior: low. Cookie security is relaxed only for HTTP/private
local-style origins where secure cookies would prevent login
persistence.

> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.

## Model Used

- OpenAI GPT-5 Codex coding agent, tool-enabled shell/git workflow,
context window not exposed by runtime.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

Screenshot note: no browser screenshots were captured in this heartbeat;
the UI changes are covered by focused component tests above.

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
 2026-05-25 13:12:41 -05:00
Dotta ece8a51e22 [codex] Bundle local branch fixes from PAP-10032 (#6604) 
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies.
> - This branch accumulated multiple already-tested control-plane,
adapter runtime, invite, workspace, plugin, and UI quality fixes on the
primary Paperclip checkout.
> - `origin/master` advanced while those commits were still local, so
the branch needed to be preserved and reconciled before review.
> - Splitting the branch commit-by-commit against the new base produced
overlapping conflicts with recently merged upstream PRs.
> - This pull request keeps the remaining branch as one standalone PR
because the final diff is 38 files after removing screenshot artifacts,
under Greptile's 100-file cap, and can be merged independently after
review.
> - The benefit is that none of the local work is lost, the branch is
now based on current `origin/master`, and reviewers can evaluate the
reconciled changes in one place.

## What Changed

- Merged the local accumulated branch with current `origin/master` and
resolved the invite-flow overlaps from the newer upstream companies
query helper.
- Preserved the local fixes for invite existing-member behavior, invite
link copy fallback, reusable workspace selection, worktree auth, static
SPA fallback, markdown wrapping, plugin slot registration, cloud
upstream UX/server polish, project sorting, and related tests.
- Removed screenshot artifacts from the PR per review request.
- Kept the PR under the requested file limit: 38 files changed, with no
`pnpm-lock.yaml` or `.github/workflows/*` changes.

## Verification

- `NODE_ENV=test pnpm exec vitest run
ui/src/pages/CompanyInvites.test.tsx ui/src/pages/InviteLanding.test.tsx
ui/src/pages/Projects.test.tsx ui/src/plugins/slots.test.ts
ui/src/components/MarkdownBody.test.tsx
server/src/__tests__/invite-accept-existing-member.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/static-index-html.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/execution-workspaces-service.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/better-auth.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/worktree-config.test.ts`
- `NODE_ENV=test pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck`
- `NODE_ENV=test pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck`
- Confirmed `git diff --name-only origin/master...HEAD | wc -l` is `38`.
- Confirmed no PR diff entries match `pnpm-lock.yaml`,
`.github/workflows/*`, or `screenshots/*`.

## Risks

- Medium review risk because this is a bundled rescue PR rather than
several narrow feature PRs.
- Invite flow and company cache behavior overlapped with newer upstream
changes; the merge resolution intentionally keeps the shared
`companiesListQueryOptions` helper while preserving local
existing-member invite behavior.
- Visual review evidence is no longer attached in-repo because
screenshots were removed from this PR per review request.

> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.

## Model Used

- OpenAI Codex, GPT-5-based coding agent, with repository tool access,
terminal execution, and git/GitHub CLI operations.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] UI screenshots were intentionally removed from this PR per review
request
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: CodexCoder <codexcoder@paperclip.local>
 2026-05-25 07:25:26 -05:00
Aron Prins 4811d8dd33 Fix wrapped company issue prefix conflicts (#6423) 
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies.
> - Company creation is the first control-plane object operators create,
and the generated issue prefix becomes part of task identity.
> - The company service already retries when a generated issue prefix
collides with the `companies_issue_prefix_idx` unique constraint.
> - Drizzle 0.45.x wraps PostgreSQL errors in `DrizzleQueryError`,
leaving the real `23505` constraint error on the `.cause` chain.
> - The existing retry detector only inspected the top-level error, so
wrapped prefix collisions surfaced as 500s instead of retrying.
> - This pull request walks the error cause chain for the exact prefix
constraint and verifies the retry path against embedded Postgres.
> - The benefit is company creation no longer fails when generated
prefixes collide under Drizzle 0.45.x wrappers.

## What Changed

- Walk the error `.cause` chain when detecting
`companies_issue_prefix_idx` unique violations, with a cycle guard and
support for `constraint` / `constraint_name` fields.
- Added an embedded Postgres regression test that seeds `ARO`, creates
`Aron & Sharon`, and verifies the retry produces `AROA`.
- Stabilized existing async tests touched by full verification: instance
sidebar plugin rendering now waits for React Query results, and
Tailscale-unavailable CLI tests explicitly hide host `tailscale`
detection.

## Verification

- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server exec vitest run
src/__tests__/companies-service.test.ts`
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server exec vitest run
src/__tests__/heartbeat-stale-queue-invalidation.test.ts`
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui exec vitest run
src/components/InstanceSidebar.test.tsx`
- `pnpm --filter paperclipai exec vitest run
src/__tests__/network-bind.test.ts src/__tests__/onboard.test.ts`
- `pnpm test:run`
- `pnpm -r typecheck`
- `pnpm build`

## Risks

- Low runtime risk: the retry behavior only expands detection for the
existing exact company issue-prefix unique constraint.
- The cause-chain walk is bounded by visited objects to avoid cycles.
- The sidebar and CLI changes are test-only stabilization and do not
change production behavior.

> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.

## Model Used

- OpenAI Codex, GPT-5 coding agent in Codex desktop, with local
shell/tool execution.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots (N/A: no UI behavior change)
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes (N/A:
bug fix with no user-facing docs change)
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

Closes #6350
 2026-05-22 15:27:54 -05:00
Dotta e43b392a79 [codex] Add local Cloud Upstream sync (#6548) 
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the control plane for AI-agent companies.
> - Operators need a path to move local company state toward Paperclip
Cloud without losing local-first control.
> - The Cloud Upstream flow needs API, persistence, CLI, and board UI
surfaces that agree on the same manifest/run model.
> - The existing branch had the feature work plus UX and error-handling
follow-ups.
> - This pull request packages the remaining Cloud Upstream sync work
into one standalone branch.
> - The benefit is an inspectable local-to-cloud sync workflow with
preview, conflicts, activation, and captured UX review states.

## What Changed

- Added Cloud Upstream shared types, server routes/services, and
persisted run schema/migration.
- Added Paperclip Cloud CLI sync helpers and local connection storage.
- Added the Cloud Upstream board UI, settings entry points, query keys,
and UX lab page.
- Added preview/activation checklist behavior, redirect handling,
manifest-only preview support, friendly errors, in-flight hints, and
entity count summaries.

## Verification

- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/plugin-sdk build`
- `NODE_ENV=test pnpm exec vitest run cli/src/__tests__/cloud.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/instance-settings-routes.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/instance-settings-service.test.ts
ui/src/pages/CloudUpstream.test.tsx
ui/src/components/CompanySettingsSidebar.test.tsx`
- `NODE_ENV=test pnpm exec vitest run
server/src/__tests__/cloud-upstreams.test.ts`

Worktree setup note: the isolated worktree install skipped native sqlite
build scripts, so I copied the already-built local sqlite binding from
the main checkout before running
`server/src/__tests__/cloud-upstreams.test.ts`. The test then passed.

## Risks

- Medium: this adds a database migration and a broad feature path across
CLI/server/UI.
- Merge order: this is the only PR in this split with a DB migration;
merge it before any future Cloud Upstream migration follow-up.
- Mitigation: the PR is based directly on current `origin/master`, has
targeted route/service/UI tests, and keeps the feature behind existing
experimental Cloud Sync settings.

> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.

## Model Used

- OpenAI GPT-5 Codex via `codex_local`, tool-enabled coding session;
exact context window not exposed by this runtime.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] If this change affects the UI, screenshot artifacts are
intentionally omitted per reviewer request
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
 2026-05-22 09:56:22 -05:00
Dotta a1835cfa5e [codex] Harden plugin runtime invocation scope (#6547) 
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip orchestrates AI-agent companies through a company-scoped
control plane.
> - Plugins extend that control plane, but plugin workers still call
back into host APIs.
> - Those worker-to-host calls need the same company boundary guarantees
as normal API routes.
> - Plugin action handlers also need authenticated actor context from
the host instead of trusting caller-supplied params.
> - This pull request hardens plugin bridge/action scope and keeps
plugin operation issues out of normal issue surfaces.
> - The benefit is safer plugin execution with clearer authorization
boundaries and better test coverage.

## What Changed

- Added host-owned invocation context plumbing for nested plugin worker
calls.
- Added actor context to plugin `performAction` calls and test harness
helpers.
- Enforced company invocation scope on worker-to-host calls and filtered
company lists to the active invocation scope.
- Extended plugin action route tests for board and agent actor context,
spoofed company params, and cross-company rejection.
- Extended plugin worker manager coverage for invocation-scope
propagation.
- Filtered typed and legacy plugin operation issue origins from default
issue/inbox lists.

## Verification

- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/plugin-sdk build`
- `NODE_ENV=test pnpm exec vitest run
packages/plugins/sdk/tests/host-client-factory.test.ts
packages/plugins/sdk/tests/testing-actions.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/plugin-routes-authz.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/plugin-worker-manager.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/issues-service.test.ts`

Note: embedded Postgres issue-service tests reported host-level Postgres
init skip for 47 tests; the non-embedded targeted tests passed.

## Risks

- Medium: plugin host authorization paths are sensitive, and external
plugins may rely on previously loose company params.
- Mitigation: the change only tightens calls when the host attached a
company invocation scope and includes explicit tests for board, agent,
and nested worker calls.

> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.

## Model Used

- OpenAI GPT-5 Codex via `codex_local`, tool-enabled coding session;
exact context window not exposed by this runtime.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
 2026-05-22 09:16:24 -05:00
Dotta 38c185fb8b [codex] Add agent permissions and controls plan (#6386) 
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies by keeping
task ownership, approvals, and operator control inside one control
plane.
> - Agent permissions and plugin-hosted company settings sit on the
boundary between autonomy and governance.
> - V1 needs scoped task assignment rules, plugin extension points, and
clearer company access surfaces without weakening company boundaries.
> - The branch builds the core authorization service, plugin SDK/host
APIs, and UI simplifications needed to support those controls.
> - Paperclip EE plugin surfaces were intentionally moved out of this
core PR per review direction, so this PR now carries only the public
core/plugin infrastructure work.
> - The latest updates preserve the PAP-9937 branch changes that belong
in this PR, remove the `design/` artifacts, and exclude the experimental
`plugin-briefs` package.
> - Greptile feedback was applied through the authorization/audit paths
and the final cleanup commit was re-reviewed at 5/5 with no unresolved
Greptile threads.
> - The benefit is safer assignment control with extension hooks for
richer permission products while preserving simple defaults for normal
operators.

## What Changed

- Added scoped task-assignment authorization decisions and routed
issue/agent assignment mutations through the authorization service.
- Added plugin SDK and host APIs for company settings slots,
authorization policy/grant management, assignment previews, and bridge
invocation scope propagation.
- Simplified core company access UI and moved advanced controls behind
plugin-provided settings surfaces.
- Added retry-now affordances for blocked issue next-step notices.
- Added protected-assignment enforcement for persisted
agent/project/issue policies, including explicit-grant fallback
behavior.
- Added incremental principal-access compatibility backfill for active
agent memberships and role-default human permission grants.
- Added the Markdown code block wrap action fix from the latest branch
changes.
- Removed `design/` artifacts from the PR and removed
`packages/plugins/plugin-briefs` from the final diff.
- Addressed Greptile feedback for plugin actor sanitization, legacy
membership handling, audit pagination, unknown grant-scope metadata, and
startup test mocks.

## Verification

- `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/access-service.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/company-portability.test.ts` -> 2 files passed, 54
tests passed.
- `pnpm exec vitest run
server/src/__tests__/server-startup-feedback-export.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/access-service.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/company-portability.test.ts` -> 3 files passed, 62
tests passed.
- `pnpm exec vitest run
server/src/__tests__/authorization-service.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/plugin-access-authorization-host-services.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/server-startup-feedback-export.test.ts` -> 3 files
passed, 28 tests passed.
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck` -> passed.
- `git diff --check` -> passed.
- `node ./scripts/check-docker-deps-stage.mjs` -> passed.
- `CI=true pnpm install --frozen-lockfile --ignore-scripts` -> passed
with no lockfile update.
- `pnpm exec vitest run
ui/src/components/MarkdownBody.interaction.test.tsx` -> 1 test passed.
- `git ls-files design packages/plugins/plugin-briefs | wc -l` -> 0.
- GitHub CI on `40cd83b53` -> all checks passed, merge state `CLEAN`.
- Greptile on `40cd83b53` -> 5/5, 102 files reviewed, 0
comments/annotations added, 0 unresolved review threads.
- Confirmed the PR diff contains no `design/`,
`packages/plugins/plugin-briefs`, `pnpm-lock.yaml`, or
`.github/workflows` changes.

## Risks

- Medium: task assignment authorization paths are behaviorally stricter
for protected/private policy data, so existing plugin-authored policies
may block assignment until explicit grants or approval flows are
configured.
- Medium: plugin-host authorization APIs expand the surface area
available to trusted plugins and need careful review for company
scoping.
- Low: startup now performs a principal-access compatibility backfill,
but the migration and runtime backfill use conflict-tolerant inserts.

> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.

## Model Used

- OpenAI Codex, GPT-5 coding agent, tool-enabled workflow with shell,
git, and GitHub CLI access.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
 2026-05-22 08:12:52 -05:00
Dotta c91a062326 [codex] Runtime control-plane fixes (#6380) 
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents through a server-side control plane
> - That control plane depends on reliable issue state transitions,
plugin lifecycle behavior, import limits, and startup/shutdown handling
> - Several small runtime fixes had accumulated on the working branch
and were mixed with larger feature work
> - Keeping them separate makes the correctness fixes reviewable and
mergeable without waiting for cloud-sync UI work
> - This pull request groups the server/runtime control-plane fixes into
one standalone branch
> - The benefit is a tighter, safer runtime baseline for retries,
imports, plugin migrations, feedback flushing, and trusted cloud import
handling

## What Changed

- Fixed updated issue list pagination sorting and scheduled retry
comment handling.
- Re-applied pending plugin migrations during hot reload and fixed
plugin-schema worktree seed restore.
- Hardened public tenant DB startup, portable import body limits,
trusted cloud import errors, and trusted cloud tenant import mutation
access.
- Expired stale request confirmations after user comments.
- Added feedback export shutdown hardening so database-unavailable flush
loops stop cleanly.
- Guarded plugin worker `error` event emission when no listener is
registered.

## Verification

- `pnpm install --frozen-lockfile --ignore-scripts`
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/plugin-sdk build`
- `npm run install --prefix
node_modules/.pnpm/sqlite3@5.1.7/node_modules/sqlite3`
- `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/issues-service.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/plugin-lifecycle-restart.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/server-startup-feedback-export.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/issue-comment-reopen-routes.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/issue-thread-interactions-service.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/issue-thread-interaction-routes.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/body-limits.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/feedback-flush-controller.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/error-handler.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/board-mutation-guard.test.ts
packages/db/src/backup-lib.test.ts` initially exposed local setup issues
and two 5s test timeouts.
- Rerun after local prereq build: `pnpm exec vitest run --testTimeout
15000 server/src/__tests__/issue-comment-reopen-routes.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/issue-thread-interaction-routes.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/feedback-flush-controller.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/server-startup-feedback-export.test.ts` passed.
- Some embedded Postgres-backed tests skipped on this host because local
Postgres init was unavailable.

## Risks

- Runtime-touching branch: startup/shutdown and issue interaction
behavior should be reviewed carefully.
- The feedback export change disables repeated flush attempts only for
database connection-refused failures; other upload failures still log
normally.
- The plugin worker error guard avoids process crashes from unhandled
EventEmitter errors but may hide errors from code paths that expected an
emitted listener.

> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.

## Model Used

- OpenAI Codex, GPT-5-based coding agent with local shell/git/tool use.
Exact hosted model ID and context-window size are not exposed by the
local Paperclip adapter runtime.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
 2026-05-20 10:37:11 -05:00
Dotta d67347be77 [codex] Provider vault secrets UX (#6381) 
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents that need scoped, auditable access
to secrets
> - Hosted and external deployments need provider vault configuration
without exposing secret values in Paperclip metadata
> - AWS Secrets Manager vault setup previously required too much manual
operator knowledge
> - Provider vault discovery and removal belong together as an
independent secrets-management improvement
> - This pull request adds AWS provider vault discovery/prefill plus
vault removal flows
> - The benefit is a safer operator path for configuring external secret
storage before higher-level cloud workflows depend on it

## What Changed

- Added shared validators/types for AWS provider vault discovery
payloads and safe provider metadata.
- Implemented AWS provider vault discovery preview on the server.
- Added provider vault removal service/route behavior.
- Added Secrets page UI for discovery prefill, removal messaging, and
related rendering coverage.
- Added Storybook provider-vault fixtures and captured screenshots for
the new UX states.

## Verification

- `pnpm install --frozen-lockfile --ignore-scripts`
- `pnpm exec vitest run packages/shared/src/validators/secret.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/aws-secrets-manager-provider.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/secrets-routes.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/secrets-service.test.ts
ui/src/pages/Secrets.render.test.tsx`
- Result: 4 files passed, 1 embedded Postgres-backed file skipped on
this host because local Postgres init was unavailable.
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui exec vitest run
src/pages/Secrets.render.test.tsx`
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck`
- Storybook screenshot capture against `Product/Secrets` on
`http://127.0.0.1:60381/iframe.html?id=product-secrets--secrets-inventory&viewMode=story&globals=theme:dark`

## Screenshots

Provider vaults tab after this change:

![Provider vaults
tab](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pap-9861-provider-vault-secrets/doc/screenshots/pr-6381/provider-vaults-tab.png)

AWS discovery candidate flow:

![AWS discovery candidate
flow](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pap-9861-provider-vault-secrets/doc/screenshots/pr-6381/aws-discovery-candidates.png)

Provider vault removal confirmation:

![Provider vault removal
confirmation](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pap-9861-provider-vault-secrets/doc/screenshots/pr-6381/remove-provider-vault-confirmation.png)

## Risks

- Secret provider metadata handling must remain non-sensitive;
validators reject credential-bearing Vault URLs and sensitive AWS
discovery keys.
- AWS discovery depends on deployment credentials being configured
correctly outside Paperclip-managed company secrets.

> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.

## Model Used

- OpenAI Codex, GPT-5-based coding agent with local shell/git/tool use.
Exact hosted model ID and context-window size are not exposed by the
local Paperclip adapter runtime.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
 2026-05-19 15:50:23 -05:00
Dotta bfe6369ef5 Guard cheap recovery model usage (#6371) 
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the control plane that coordinates AI-agent work
through issues, heartbeats, comments, approvals, and auditable recovery
paths.
> - The affected subsystem is heartbeat/recovery orchestration,
especially the optional cheap model profile used for operational
recovery overhead.
> - Cheap recovery should repair status and liveness, but it must not
become the worker lane that writes deliverables, continues source work,
or propagates cheap execution hints into downstream retries.
> - The gap was that cheap-profile hints could follow recovery wake
contexts and assignment overrides farther than intended, making real
work eligible to run on the cheap model.
> - This pull request separates status-only cheap recovery from normal
source-work continuations, adds route guards for deliverable mutations
during cheap status-only runs, and documents the invariant.
> - The benefit is safer retry/recovery behavior: cheap runs can clean
up control-plane state, while any remaining source work resumes through
a normal/original model path.

## What Changed

- Added recovery model-profile work classes so status-only recovery
carries explicit guard context and normal-model continuations scrub
cheap hints.
- Updated heartbeat, productivity review, liveness continuation, and
recovery service wakeups to request cheap only for bounded status-only
recovery work.
- Blocked cheap status-only recovery runs from writing issue documents,
plans, attachments, work products, or assigning downstream work back to
`modelProfile: "cheap"`.
- Added/updated server tests for cheap profile propagation,
artifact/document guards, route authorization, retry scheduling, and
successful-run handoff behavior.
- Documented the recovery model-profile lane in
`doc/SPEC-implementation.md` and `doc/execution-semantics.md`.
- After rebasing onto current `public-gh/master`, stabilized the new
`InstanceSidebar` plugin-filter tests so the PR check lane stays green.

## Verification

- Local: `pnpm exec vitest run --config vitest.config.ts
src/services/recovery/model-profile-hint.test.ts
src/__tests__/issue-agent-mutation-ownership-routes.test.ts
src/__tests__/issue-document-restore-routes.test.ts` from `server/` - 3
files, 37 tests passed after final edits.
- Local: `pnpm exec vitest run --config vitest.config.ts
src/__tests__/heartbeat-process-recovery.test.ts` from `server/` - 44
tests passed after rerunning the cleanup-sensitive file alone.
- Local: `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui exec vitest run
src/components/InstanceSidebar.test.tsx` - 4 tests passed.
- Local: `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck` - passed.
- Local: `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck` - passed.
- PR checks on latest head `6f8c3b1380f5bd872c6f49f6f7188ecf3bb6d263` -
all green, including `verify`, build, typecheck,
server/general/serialized tests, e2e, Snyk, and policy.
- Greptile: pass 3 returned Confidence Score 5/5 with zero unresolved
Greptile review threads.

## Risks

- Medium risk: recovery behavior is intentionally stricter, so any path
that incorrectly relies on cheap recovery to keep doing source work will
now need to hand back to a normal-model run.
- Low migration risk: no schema changes.
- No product UI changes; the UI file touched is a test-only
stabilization after rebasing onto current `master`.

> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.

## Model Used

- OpenAI Codex coding agent, GPT-5 model family (`gpt-5`), tool use and
local code execution enabled; context window not exposed in this
environment.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots (N/A: no product UI changes)
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
 2026-05-19 13:46:02 -05:00
Devin Foley e5a0f5debd fix(plugin): raise environmentProbe RPC timeout to 120s for cold-start sandboxes (#6289) 
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies
> - Companies provision execution environments via sandbox provider
plugins (Modal, Daytona, E2B, etc.)
> - At provision time, the server probes each plugin's environment /
sandbox-provider driver over a worker RPC to validate config
> - `workerManager.call()` defaults to a 30s timeout, but cold-start
sandboxes — Modal in particular — take ~31s to boot
> - Result: every fresh Modal environment probe fails with a worker RPC
timeout, blocking environment provisioning end-to-end
> - This PR passes `timeoutMs=120_000` to the two probe call sites
(`probePluginEnvironmentDriver`, `probePluginSandboxProviderDriver`)
> - The benefit is Modal — and any future provider with similar
cold-start latency — can be successfully probed without false-negative
timeout failures

## What Changed

- Pass `timeoutMs=120_000` to `workerManager.call()` in
`probePluginEnvironmentDriver`
(`server/src/services/plugin-environment-driver.ts`)
- Pass `timeoutMs=120_000` to `workerManager.call()` in
`probePluginSandboxProviderDriver` (same file)

## Verification

- Targeted unit tests:
  ```
  pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server exec vitest run \
    src/__tests__/plugin-environment-driver-seam.test.ts \
    src/__tests__/heartbeat-plugin-environment.test.ts
  ```
  5/5 tests pass.
- Manual: provision a fresh Modal sandbox environment from the UI.
Previously failed with a worker RPC timeout at ~30s; now succeeds.

## Risks

- Low risk. The change only raises a per-call timeout (default 30s →
explicit 120s) on two probe call sites. Fast providers are unaffected
since probe completes well below either bound. Worst case: a genuinely
hung worker now blocks the probe for 120s instead of 30s before giving
up — still bounded, and only on the provision-time probe path (not the
heartbeat/run path).

## Model Used

- Provider: Anthropic
- Model: `claude-opus-4-7` (Claude Opus 4.7, 1M context window)
- Capabilities: extended thinking, tool use, code execution
- Scope of AI assistance: the underlying 4-line code change was
human-authored by the committer; this PR (verification commands, message
structuring, and submission) was prepared with Claude per the
`paperclip-dev` skill.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [ ] I have added or updated tests where applicable — n/a, this is a
per-call timeout configuration bump; existing tests cover the probe call
path
- [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots — n/a, no UI change
- [ ] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes — n/a,
the timeout is an internal worker-RPC tuning value with no documented
contract
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
 2026-05-18 09:32:12 -07:00
Dotta 5071c4c776 [codex] Add workspace diff viewer plugin (#6071) 
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies.
> - Operators need to inspect what agents changed inside execution and
project workspaces.
> - The existing workspace detail views did not provide a first-party
rich diff surface for staged, unstaged, head, renamed, binary,
oversized, and untracked changes.
> - The plugin system is the intended extension point for optional rich
UI surfaces.
> - This pull request adds a workspace diff plugin plus host services
and shared contracts so Changes tabs can render workspace diffs through
plugin slots.
> - The diff-renderer dependency should stay owned by the plugin package
rather than the core UI app.
> - The dependency surface must stay aligned with repository PR policy,
including intentionally omitting `pnpm-lock.yaml` from the PR.
> - The benefit is a more reviewable workspace surface without
hard-coding the renderer into every page.

## What Changed

- Added `@paperclipai/plugin-workspace-diff`, including diff
normalization, plugin manifest/worker/UI entrypoints, and focused plugin
tests.
- Kept `@pierre/diffs` scoped to `@paperclipai/plugin-workspace-diff`;
removed the core UI lab diff-renderer surface and direct UI package
dependency.
- Added shared workspace diff types and validators, plus plugin SDK
surface for workspace diff host services.
- Added server workspace diff service support and route coverage for
execution/project workspace diff flows.
- Wired Execution Workspace and Project Workspace Changes tabs to load
the diff plugin, including loading/error fallback behavior.
- Added UI tests and fixtures for the Changes tabs and plugin bridge
behavior.
- Added the new plugin package manifest to the Docker deps stage so PR
policy can validate dependency coverage.
- Addressed review hardening around empty untracked patches, workspace
path exposure, project workspace read capability checks, and default
base refs.

## Verification

- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/plugin-workspace-diff test`
- `pnpm exec vitest run
packages/shared/src/validators/workspace-diff.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/workspace-diff-service.test.ts
ui/src/pages/ProjectWorkspaceDetail.test.tsx
ui/src/pages/ExecutionWorkspaceDetail.test.tsx`
- `pnpm exec vitest run ui/src/plugins/bridge.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/workspace-runtime-routes-authz.test.ts`
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/shared typecheck`
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/plugin-workspace-diff typecheck`
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck`
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck`
- `node ./scripts/check-docker-deps-stage.mjs`
- Browser screenshot captured from the local worktree dev server:
https://files.catbox.moe/ofdpsp.png
- Confirmed branch is rebased onto `public-gh/master`,
`.github/workflows/pr.yml` is not included in the PR diff,
`ui/package.json` is not included in the PR diff, and `pnpm-lock.yaml`
is not included in the PR diff.

## Risks

- Medium UI integration risk: the Changes tab depends on the plugin slot
and host diff service path.
- Medium dependency risk: this adds `@pierre/diffs` in the plugin
package, but `pnpm-lock.yaml` is intentionally omitted per packaging
instructions because repository automation manages lockfile updates.
- Current CI blocker: downstream frozen installs fail until the
repository policy path for new plugin package dependencies is chosen.
- Diff rendering edge cases are covered for common working-tree and head
diff states, but very large repositories may still expose performance
limits.
- No migrations are included.

> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.

## Model Used

- OpenAI Codex, GPT-5 class coding model, tool-enabled local execution
environment. Exact context window was not exposed by the runtime.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
 2026-05-18 08:50:06 -05:00
Dotta d734bd43d1 [codex] Roll up May 17 branch changes (#6210) 
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the control plane for autonomous AI companies, so agent
work needs visible ownership, recovery, and operator controls.
> - This local branch had accumulated several related control-plane
reliability and operator-experience fixes across recovery actions,
watchdog folding, model-profile defaults, mentions, markdown editing,
plugin launchers, and small UI polish.
> - The branch needed to be converted into a PR against the current
`origin/master` without losing dirty work or including lockfile/workflow
churn.
> - The safest standalone shape is a single rollup PR because the
recovery/server/UI files overlap heavily across the local commits and
splitting would create avoidable conflicts.
> - This pull request replays the local branch onto latest
`origin/master`, preserves the uncommitted work as logical commits, and
adds a Zod 4 validator compatibility fix found during verification.
> - The benefit is that the May 17 local branch can be reviewed and
merged as one coherent, conflict-free branch under the 100-file Greptile
limit.

## What Changed

- Rebased the local May 17 branch work onto current `origin/master` in a
dedicated worktree.
- Preserved and committed previously dirty changes for recovery retry
handling, plugin/sidebar launcher polish, and `.herenow` ignores.
- Added recovery-action behavior for returning source issues to `todo`
when retrying source-scoped recovery.
- Included the existing local recovery/liveness/watchdog fold, Codex
cheap-profile, markdown/mention, duplicate-agent, and UI polish commits
from the branch.
- Normalized shared validator `z.record(...)` schemas to explicit
string-key records for Zod 4 compatibility.
- Confirmed the PR has no `pnpm-lock.yaml` or `.github/workflows/*`
changes and stays below the 100-file Greptile limit.

## Verification

- `pnpm install --frozen-lockfile --ignore-scripts`
- `npm run install` in
`node_modules/.pnpm/sqlite3@5.1.7/node_modules/sqlite3` to build the
local native sqlite3 binding after installing with scripts disabled
- `pnpm exec vitest run packages/shared/src/validators/issue.test.ts
packages/shared/src/project-mentions.test.ts
packages/adapter-utils/src/server-utils.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-model-profile.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/issue-recovery-actions.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/issue-agent-mutation-ownership-routes.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-active-run-output-watchdog.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/plugin-local-folders.test.ts
ui/src/components/IssueRecoveryActionCard.test.tsx
ui/src/components/Sidebar.test.tsx
ui/src/components/SidebarAccountMenu.test.tsx
ui/src/components/IssueProperties.test.tsx
ui/src/components/MarkdownEditor.test.tsx
ui/src/components/MarkdownBody.test.tsx
ui/src/lib/duplicate-agent-payload.test.ts
ui/src/pages/Routines.test.tsx`
- First pass: 13 files passed with 201 passing tests; 3 server files
failed before sqlite3 native binding was built.
- After rebuilding sqlite3:
`server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-model-profile.test.ts`,
`server/src/__tests__/issue-recovery-actions.test.ts`, and
`server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-active-run-output-watchdog.test.ts`
passed/loaded; embedded Postgres tests were skipped by the local host
guard.
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/shared typecheck`
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/adapter-utils typecheck`
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck`
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck`

## Risks

- Medium risk: this is a broad rollup PR across recovery semantics,
server tests, shared validators, and UI surfaces.
- Some embedded Postgres tests skipped locally due the host guard, so CI
should provide the stronger database-backed signal.
- UI changes were covered by component tests, but no browser screenshot
was captured in this PR creation pass.
- This branch may overlap with existing recovery/liveness PR work; merge
this PR independently or restack/close overlapping branches rather than
merging duplicate implementations together.

> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.

## Model Used

- OpenAI Codex, GPT-5-based coding agent, tool-enabled local repository
and GitHub workflow, medium reasoning effort.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [ ] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
 2026-05-17 17:15:06 -05:00
Dotta 705c1b8d81 [codex] Add routine env secrets support (#6212) 
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies.
> - Scheduled routines are the control-plane path for recurring agent
work.
> - Routines already had dispatch/history, but their runtime environment
did not carry routine-owned secret bindings through execution.
> - Operators need routine-specific secrets that can override
project/agent env without exposing secret values in history, logs, or
access events.
> - This pull request adds the routine env runtime contract, wires it
into execution, and makes the routine UI/history surfaces show safe
secret metadata.
> - The benefit is that routine executions can use scoped secret refs
predictably while preserving company boundaries and auditability.

## What Changed

- Added routine env persistence/runtime support, including
`routines.env`, `routine_runs.routine_revision_id`, revision snapshots,
and idempotent migration `0086_routine_env_runtime_contract`.
- Resolved routine env during heartbeat adapter config assembly with
precedence `agent < project < routine` and secret access events recorded
against the routine consumer.
- Added secret binding synchronization for routine create/update/restore
flows and guarded cross-company, missing, disabled, and deleted secret
cases.
- Added a Secrets tab to routine detail, env/secret history diff
rendering, and Storybook coverage for the new UI states.
- Added server/UI regression tests, including an embedded-Postgres QA
path for routine secret execution and restore behavior.
- Updated implementation/database docs for routine env and
secret-binding behavior.

## Verification

- `pnpm install --frozen-lockfile` after rebasing onto
`public-gh/master` to refresh workspace links for the newly-added
upstream Grok adapter package.
- `pnpm exec vitest run
server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-project-env.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/routines-service.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/secrets-service.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/qa-routine-secrets-e2e.test.ts
ui/src/components/RoutineHistoryTab.test.tsx` passed: 5 files, 92 tests.
- `pnpm -r typecheck` passed across the workspace.
- `pnpm build` passed. Vite emitted the existing
large-chunk/dynamic-import warnings.
- UI screenshots were captured locally during QA in
`artifacts/pap-9521/` and `artifacts/pap-9522/`; generated screenshots
are not committed to avoid adding binary artifacts to the repo.

## Risks

- Migration risk is limited by `IF NOT EXISTS` guards for the new
columns, FK, and index, and the migration is ordered as `0086`
immediately after upstream `0085`.
- Runtime behavior changes env precedence for routine executions by
adding routine env as the highest-precedence layer; tests cover
agent/project/routine precedence.
- Secret handling is security-sensitive; tests cover value-free
manifests/events/errors, disabled/missing/deleted secrets, and
cross-company rejection.
- UI history now renders routine env/secret diffs; tests and Storybook
stories cover the main rendering paths.

> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.

## Model Used

- OpenAI Codex coding agent based on GPT-5, with shell/tool use and
medium reasoning effort.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
 2026-05-17 16:30:34 -05:00
Dotta eb38b226c2 Fix LLM Wiki package and migration validation (#6010) 
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies.
> - Plugins extend the control plane with optional capabilities such as
LLM Wiki.
> - LLM Wiki needs its package assets and plugin-owned database
migrations to work when installed from the packaged plugin.
> - The bundled spaces migration used validation-hostile dynamic SQL,
and the packaged plugin could omit non-dist runtime assets.
> - This pull request makes the LLM Wiki package include its required
assets and cuts the spaces migration over to explicit, idempotent SQL
that passes the production plugin database validator.
> - The benefit is a simpler plugin install path that validates and
applies the bundled LLM Wiki migrations without adding plugin-specific
legacy handling to Paperclip core.

## What Changed

- Added the LLM Wiki package asset allowlist so agents, migrations,
skills, templates, dist output, and README are included when packaged.
- Renamed the bootstrap `.gitignore` template to `gitignore.template`
and updated the runtime lookup so package tooling does not drop the
hidden template file.
- Relaxed plugin migration validation to allow namespace-scoped
`INSERT`/`UPDATE` backfills and `CREATE INDEX` statements while
continuing to reject destructive or cross-namespace SQL.
- Replaced the LLM Wiki spaces migration's dynamic constraint-drop DO
block with explicit `DROP CONSTRAINT IF EXISTS` statements.
- Replaced fragile regex-source dispatch in SQL reference extraction
with explicit capture-group descriptors.
- Added regression coverage that applies the bundled LLM Wiki migrations
through the production validator and checks the expected constraints.

## Verification

- `pnpm exec vitest run --project @paperclipai/server
server/src/__tests__/plugin-database.test.ts --pool=forks
--poolOptions.forks.isolate=true`
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/plugin-llm-wiki build`
- `git diff --check`
- Confirmed `pnpm-lock.yaml` is not included in the branch diff.

## Risks

- Low migration risk for current users: LLM Wiki spaces are new, so this
intentionally cuts over the plugin migration instead of adding legacy
handling in core.
- Validator behavior is broader than before, but still requires fully
qualified plugin namespace targets, blocks deletes/destructive DDL, and
keeps public table access read-only and allowlisted.

> Checked [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md); this is a targeted plugin
packaging/migration fix and does not duplicate planned core feature
work. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.

## Model Used

- OpenAI Codex, GPT-5 based coding agent, tool-enabled local repo
access, reasoning mode managed by the Paperclip/Codex runtime. Exact
context window was not surfaced in this session.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
 2026-05-15 10:20:02 -05:00
Dotta 03ad5c5bea [codex] Add issue document locking (#6009) 
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip orchestrates AI-agent companies through company-scoped
issues, comments, and issue documents.
> - Issue documents are the durable place where plans, handoffs, and
other work artifacts are revised over time.
> - Some documents need to be preserved as operator-approved snapshots
while agents continue working on the same issue.
> - Without document locking, a later board or agent write can overwrite
the document key that reviewers expected to remain stable.
> - This pull request adds board-managed issue document locks and makes
agent writes to locked keys create a derived document instead of
mutating the locked document.
> - The benefit is safer document handoffs: approved or frozen issue
documents stay immutable until the board explicitly unlocks them.

## What Changed

- Added `locked_at`, `locked_by_agent_id`, and `locked_by_user_id`
document fields plus migration `0085_tranquil_the_executioner.sql`.
- Added document lock/unlock service behavior, route endpoints, activity
events, and locked-document write protections.
- Made agent document writes to locked keys create a new derived key
such as `plan-2` rather than overwriting the locked document.
- Surfaced lock state through shared issue document types, UI API
methods, document header lock controls, and activity formatting.
- Added server and UI tests for lock/unlock behavior, locked document
immutability, and UI action visibility.
- Updated `doc/SPEC-implementation.md` with the V1 document lock
contract and endpoints.

## Verification

- `git rebase public-gh/master` completed cleanly after committing the
branch changes.
- `git diff --check` passed before commit.
- `pnpm run preflight:workspace-links && pnpm exec vitest run
server/src/__tests__/documents-service.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/issue-agent-mutation-ownership-routes.test.ts
ui/src/components/IssueDocumentsSection.test.tsx
ui/src/components/IssueContinuationHandoff.test.tsx
ui/src/lib/document-revisions.test.ts` passed: 5 files, 32 tests.

## Risks

- Medium risk because this changes the document persistence contract and
adds a migration.
- The migration uses `ADD COLUMN IF NOT EXISTS` and guarded foreign-key
creation so it remains safe for users who may have already applied an
earlier copy of the migration.
- Locked documents intentionally reject board edits/deletes/restores
until unlocked; any existing workflows that expected direct overwrite
need to unlock first.
- Agent writes to locked keys now create derived documents, which may
create extra issue documents when agents retry locked writes.

## Model Used

- OpenAI Codex coding agent based on GPT-5, with tool use and local code
execution in the Paperclip worktree.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [ ] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
 2026-05-15 08:54:55 -05:00
Devin Foley 901c088e14 fix: propagate projectId into wakeup context and support identifier lookup (#6026) 
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies
> - The server's heartbeat/wakeup pipeline resolves which project
workspace an agent run should bind to
> - `enqueueWakeup` resolves an issue (and therefore a project) before
scheduling a run, but the resolved `projectId` was never written back
into `enrichedContextSnapshot.projectId`, so `resolveWorkspaceForRun`
always saw `contextProjectId === null`
> - When the `issueProjectRef` DB lookup also returned null (e.g.
identifier-style id like `ENV-13`, not a UUID), workspace resolution
fell through to the `agent_home` fallback instead of the correct project
workspace
> - Surfaced while running the QA matrix on sandbox/SSH — runs were
ending up in the wrong workspace
> - This pull request stores the resolved `projectId` back into context
and replaces the raw UUID-only DB query with `issuesSvc.getById`, which
accepts both UUIDs and identifiers and canonicalizes `context.issueId` /
`context.taskId` to the UUID on identifier hits
> - The benefit is that wakeups triggered with identifier-style ids
correctly bind to their project workspace instead of silently degrading
to `agent_home`

## What Changed

- In `enqueueWakeup`, after the issue resolves, write `projectId` back
into `enrichedContextSnapshot.projectId` so downstream workspace
resolution can use it.
- Replace the raw UUID-only DB query for the issue with
`issuesSvc.getById`, which handles both UUIDs and identifiers (e.g.
`ENV-13`).
- On an identifier hit, canonicalize `context.issueId` and
`context.taskId` to the resolved UUID.

## Verification

- Trigger a wakeup with an identifier-style id (`ENV-13`) on the dev
instance and confirm the run binds to the correct project workspace
instead of `agent_home`.
- Confirm UUID-style wakeups still resolve to the same project workspace
as before.

## Risks

- Low risk. Scope is a single function in
`server/src/services/heartbeat.ts` (+20/-7). Failure mode if regressed
is the prior behavior (fallback to `agent_home`).

## Model Used

- Claude (Anthropic), `claude-opus-4-7`, via Claude Code / Paperclip
`claude_local` adapter.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [ ] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots
- [ ] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
 2026-05-14 22:09:16 -07:00
Dotta 333a16b035 Fix company export with missing run logs (#5960) 
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the control plane for autonomous AI companies.
> - Company export/import lets operators move company state, including
issue threads and agent execution context, between Paperclip instances.
> - Issue comments can be enriched by nearby heartbeat run logs so
exported threads preserve useful agent/run attribution metadata.
> - Some local instances can have heartbeat run database rows whose
local log files were deleted or never copied into the current workspace.
> - The export path should still include the original user comments
instead of failing because optional run-log metadata is unavailable.
> - This pull request makes comment run-log metadata derivation tolerate
missing local log files, logs the missing-file condition for operators,
and adds a regression test.
> - The benefit is safer company exports for real instances with
incomplete local run-log storage.

## What Changed

- Treat missing local heartbeat run logs as absent optional metadata
while listing issue comments.
- Emit a structured warning with `runId` and `logRef` when optional
comment-attribution log content is missing.
- Preserve the existing error behavior for non-404 run-log read
failures.
- Added a regression test proving user comments still list when a
candidate attribution run has a missing local log reference.

## Verification

- `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/issues-service.test.ts -t
"candidate attribution run log is missing"` passed: 1 selected test
passed, 47 skipped.
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck` passed.
- Greptile Review passed with Confidence Score 5/5 and zero unresolved
threads on commit `f68cac02bf98d7d31e7831e5bdfa95cffa85e254`.
- GitHub PR workflow run succeeded: `policy`, `verify`, four serialized
server suites, `e2e`, and `Canary Dry Run` all passed.
- `security/snyk (cryppadotta)` passed.
- Confirmed this branch is on top of `public-gh/master` and
`pnpm-lock.yaml` is not in the PR diff.

## Risks

- Low risk. The change only softens optional comment metadata derivation
for 404/missing local log files; other log read errors still throw.
- Exported comments in this edge case may lack derived run metadata, but
they remain visible/exportable instead of failing the request.
- Operators may see new warnings when historical run-log references
point to missing local files; those warnings indicate degraded optional
metadata, not data loss.

## Model Used

- OpenAI Codex, GPT-5 coding agent in this Paperclip heartbeat, with
shell/git/GitHub CLI tool use.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
 2026-05-14 08:37:04 -05:00
Devin Foley 1bd44c8a0d Harden Cloudflare sandbox execution (#5967) 
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies.
> - Remote-managed adapters need sandbox/environment execution to behave
like real agent runs, not just local host probes.
> - The Cloudflare sandbox path was the weakest leg in the SSH +
Cloudflare QA matrix because bridge execution could truncate output,
time out long-running installs, and under-provision the worker instance.
> - That made several adapters fail for reasons unrelated to their
actual business logic, which blocks confidence in Paperclip's non-local
environment model.
> - This pull request hardens the Cloudflare bridge/runtime path and
adjusts sandbox probe budgets so adapter verification matches the
measured behavior of the fixed environment.
> - It also corrects the Pi sandbox install command so the QA matrix
exercises a real, supported install path.
> - The benefit is a materially more reliable SSH + Cloudflare adapter
matrix with fewer false negatives and clearer failure boundaries.

## What Changed

- Switched the Cloudflare bridge worker instance type to `standard-2`
for the QA-matrix execution path.
- Raised Cloudflare bridge/plugin-worker timeout budgets and added SSE
keepalives so long-running install/exec calls can complete instead of
dying at the transport layer.
- Fixed Cloudflare bridge-channel command handling to avoid dropped
final stdout chunks on short-lived execs.
- Made Claude, OpenCode, and Cursor sandbox probe timeouts
configurable/sandbox-aware, then tightened the defaults to the measured
post-fix range.
- Updated the Pi sandbox install command to use the package currently
installed by the official `pi.dev` installer, pinned to a specific npm
version.
- Added/updated tests around Cloudflare bridge behavior and adapter
sandbox probe paths.

## Verification

- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/adapter-claude-local typecheck`
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/adapter-opencode-local typecheck`
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/adapter-cursor-local typecheck`
- `pnpm vitest run packages/adapters/cursor-local
packages/adapters/claude-local packages/adapters/opencode-local
packages/adapters/pi-local packages/plugins/sandbox-providers/cloudflare
server/src/services/__tests__/plugin-worker-manager.test.ts`
- Manual QA on the dedicated dev instance using the SSH + Cloudflare
environment matrix (`ENV-29` through `ENV-40`). Clean end-to-end passes:
SSH `claude_local`, `codex_local`, `cursor`, `gemini_local`; Cloudflare
`claude_local`, `codex_local`, `cursor`, `gemini_local`.

## Risks

- Cloudflare sandbox cost increases because the bridge worker now runs
on `standard-2` instead of `lite`.
- Higher timeout ceilings can delay surfacing truly hung Cloudflare
bridge calls, even though they remove transport-level false negatives.
- The manual heartbeat matrix still exposed follow-on
execution/sync/disposition bugs in `opencode_local` and `pi_local`;
those are not fixed by this PR.

## Model Used

- OpenAI `gpt-5.4` via Paperclip `codex_local`, reasoning effort `high`,
tool use enabled, repo search enabled.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots (not applicable)
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes (not
applicable)
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
 2026-05-13 22:00:10 -07:00
Dotta 4142559c37 [codex] Add blocked inbox attention view (#5603) 
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies through
company-scoped issues, comments, approvals, and execution workspaces.
> - Operators need the Inbox to show not only active work, but also
blocked work that may need human or agent attention.
> - The existing inbox experience did not have a dedicated blocked-work
surface, so blocked tasks were harder to triage and resume deliberately.
> - Backend consumers also needed a compact attention signal that
distinguishes actionable blockers from covered or waiting blocker
states.
> - This pull request adds a Blocked Inbox tab backed by issue
blocker-attention metadata, shared validators, and UI helpers.
> - The benefit is a clearer triage path for stalled or blocked
Paperclip work without exposing external wait internals in the
operator-facing UI.

## What Changed

- Added shared issue blocker-attention types, validators, and exports
for the API/UI contract.
- Added backend blocker-attention computation and issue route support
for blocked inbox data.
- Added the Blocked Inbox tab, blocked reason chips, filtering/search
UI, responsive layouts, and Storybook stories.
- Updated inbox helpers and page behavior so toolbar controls only
appear where they apply.
- Added coverage for shared validators, server blocker-attention
behavior, blocked inbox UI helpers/components, and the Inbox page.
- Added a screenshot helper script for the blocked inbox Storybook
stories.
- Addressed Greptile feedback by making urgency sorting deterministic
for null stop times, avoiding full blocked-inbox list enrichment for
counts, and hardening the screenshot helper.

## Verification

- Rebased the branch cleanly onto `public-gh/master`.
- Confirmed the diff does not include `pnpm-lock.yaml`.
- Confirmed the diff does not include database migration files.
- Ran `pnpm exec vitest run packages/shared/src/validators/issue.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/issue-blocker-attention.test.ts
ui/src/components/BlockedInboxView.test.tsx
ui/src/components/BlockedReasonChip.test.tsx
ui/src/lib/blockedInbox.test.ts ui/src/lib/inbox.test.ts
ui/src/pages/Inbox.test.tsx`.
- Ran `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/shared typecheck && pnpm --filter
@paperclipai/server typecheck && pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui
typecheck`.
- Checked `ROADMAP.md`; this is scoped inbox/operator triage work and
does not duplicate a listed roadmap feature.
- Greptile Review is green on the latest head and all four Greptile
review threads are resolved.
- GitHub PR checks are green on the latest head: policy, security/snyk,
e2e, verify, Canary Dry Run, Greptile Review, and serialized server
suites 1/4 through 4/4.

## Risks

- Medium review surface because this touches the shared issue contract,
server issue services, and the Inbox UI together.
- Blocker-attention classification may need product tuning after
operators use it on real blocked queues.
- UI screenshots were not attached in this PR-opening pass; the branch
includes `scripts/screenshot-blocked-inbox.mjs` and Storybook stories
for visual capture.

> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, GPT-5-based coding agent with shell, git, GitHub CLI,
GitHub connector, and Paperclip API tool use. Reasoning mode: medium.
Context window: not exposed by the runtime.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [ ] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
 2026-05-13 16:41:36 -05:00
Dotta d1a8c873b2 fix(remote-sandbox): harden host workspace resumes (#5922) 
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents through a control plane while
adapters execute work in local, remote, or sandboxed runtimes.
> - Remote sandbox execution depends on a strict host-versus-remote
workspace boundary: the host prepares/restores files, while the adapter
command runs inside the sandbox cwd.
> - Jannes' PR #5823 identified host-side failure modes that were not
covered by replacement PR #5822.
> - Persisting a remote pod cwd in session params could poison the next
host heartbeat resume and make Paperclip inspect or upload system temp
roots.
> - Plugin sandbox providers also need a narrow way to receive
model-provider API keys without exposing the full server environment to
every plugin worker.
> - This pull request ports the host-side fixes from #5823 in the
current codebase style, with focused regression coverage.
> - The benefit is safer remote sandbox resumes and plugin worker
environment handling without broadening core plugin privileges.

## What Changed

- Persist host workspace cwd, not remote sandbox cwd, in `claude_local`
session params while retaining remote execution identity metadata.
- Reject saved session cwds that point at system roots before heartbeat
falls back to agent home workspace.
- Skip sockets, FIFOs, devices, and other non-file entries during
workspace restore snapshot capture/comparison.
- Pass a small model-provider API-key allowlist only to plugins
declaring `environment.drivers.register`.
- Added focused regression tests for remote Claude session params,
unsafe session cwd detection, plugin worker env filtering, and non-file
snapshot entries.

Credits: ports host-side fixes from Jannes' #5823.

## Verification

- `pnpm vitest run
packages/adapter-utils/src/workspace-restore-merge.test.ts
server/src/services/session-workspace-cwd.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/claude-local-execute.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/plugin-database.test.ts` (25 passed, 7 skipped by
existing embedded-Postgres host guard)
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/adapter-utils typecheck`
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/adapter-claude-local typecheck`
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck`

## Risks

- Low risk: changes are scoped to remote sandbox/session metadata,
workspace snapshot filtering, and plugin worker env setup.
- Sandbox-provider plugins now receive only the explicit model-provider
key allowlist; any provider needing another key name will need a
deliberate allowlist update.

> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.

## Model Used

- OpenAI Codex, GPT-5-based coding agent, tool-enabled local code
execution and repository editing.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
 2026-05-13 16:23:04 -05:00
Dotta eb452fba30 Fix comment date binding regression (#5919) 
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the control plane for autonomous AI companies, and
issue comments are the primary durable communication surface between
operators and agents.
> - Commit `c445e592` (`fix(ui): fix message attribution for
agent-posted comments with user author IDs (#5780)`) added server-side
derived attribution for historical comments by scanning heartbeat runs
near comment timestamps.
> - That scan accidentally bound JavaScript `Date` objects directly into
postgres-js SQL fragments for the run timestamp window.
> - On real Postgres, that can fail while listing issue comments with
`ERR_INVALID_ARG_TYPE`, which makes comments disappear from issue pages
such as `PAP-9284`.
> - This pull request keeps the attribution behavior intact while
changing only the broken timestamp binding path.
> - The benefit is that comments load again without weakening the
conservative attribution recovery introduced by `c445e592`.

## What Changed

- Convert the derived-attribution heartbeat-run window bounds to ISO
timestamp strings before binding them into SQL, with explicit
`::timestamptz` casts.
- Add an embedded Postgres regression that inserts a heartbeat run and
user-authored comment, then verifies `issueService.listComments()`
returns the comment while the attribution scan runs.
- Delete `heartbeat_runs` during the issue service test cleanup before
deleting agents so the new test data does not leak across cases.

## Verification

- `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/issues-service.test.ts -t
"lists user comments when derived run attribution scans a timestamp
window"`
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck`
- `git diff --check`

## Risks

- Low risk. The change is limited to how timestamp parameters are bound
for an existing query.
- The derived attribution logic remains conservative and still requires
exact run-log proof before relabeling a comment.
- The regression uses embedded Postgres so it covers the postgres-js
binding path that failed in production-like local runs.

> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.

## Model Used

- OpenAI Codex via the Paperclip `codex_local` adapter; GPT-5
coding-agent family with local terminal, file-editing, and git/GitHub
CLI tool use. Exact hosted model deployment ID is not exposed by this
local adapter runtime.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots (not applicable: server-side comment API bugfix)
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes (not
applicable: no documented behavior or command changed)
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
 2026-05-13 12:56:51 -05:00
Dotta b947a7d76c [codex] Improve local plugin development workflow (#5821) 
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the control plane for autonomous AI-agent companies.
> - Plugins are the extension point for adding capabilities without
expanding the core product surface.
> - Local plugin development needed a tighter CLI-first loop so plugin
authors can scaffold, run, install, inspect, and reload plugins without
reaching into internal package paths.
> - The server plugin install path also needed local-path handling that
keeps plugin identity, dashboard routes, and development watchers
coherent.
> - This pull request adds the CLI scaffold/install workflow, fixes the
server and SDK edge cases that blocked that loop, and updates the
agent-facing plugin creation skill and docs.
> - The benefit is that contributors can develop plugins from local
folders with a documented, repeatable happy path.

## What Changed

- Added `paperclipai plugin init` coverage and CLI wiring for local
plugin scaffolding.
- Improved local plugin install handling, plugin key route resolution,
dashboard capability behavior, and dev watcher startup/reload behavior.
- Fixed plugin SDK worker entrypoint validation for symlinked package
layouts.
- Added targeted tests for plugin init, server plugin authz/watcher
behavior, SDK worker host validation, and the authoring smoke example.
- Added a short local plugin development guide and refreshed the plugin
authoring guide plus `paperclip-create-plugin` skill instructions.

## Verification

- `pnpm run preflight:workspace-links && pnpm --filter
@paperclipai/plugin-sdk build && pnpm --filter
@paperclipai/create-paperclip-plugin typecheck && pnpm --filter
paperclipai typecheck && pnpm --filter @paperclipai/plugin-sdk typecheck
&& pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck`
- `pnpm exec vitest run --project paperclipai
cli/src/__tests__/plugin-init.test.ts`
- `pnpm exec vitest run --project @paperclipai/plugin-sdk
packages/plugins/sdk/tests/worker-rpc-host.test.ts`
- `pnpm exec vitest run --project @paperclipai/server
server/src/__tests__/plugin-dev-watcher.test.ts --pool=forks
--poolOptions.forks.isolate=true`
- `pnpm exec vitest run --project @paperclipai/server
server/src/__tests__/plugin-routes-authz.test.ts --pool=forks
--poolOptions.forks.isolate=true`
- `pnpm --dir packages/plugins/examples/plugin-authoring-smoke-example
test`
- Confirmed `pnpm-lock.yaml` is not included in the PR diff.

## Risks

- Medium risk: this touches plugin install routing, CLI command
behavior, and the local development watcher.
- Local path plugin installs execute trusted local code by design; the
new docs call out that trust boundary.
- No database migrations are included.

> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.

## Model Used

- OpenAI Codex, GPT-5 coding agent, tool-enabled local shell and git
workflow, medium reasoning effort. Context window details were not
exposed in this runtime.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

UI screenshots: not applicable; this PR changes CLI/server/plugin docs
and tests, not board UI rendering.

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
 2026-05-12 17:38:24 -05:00
Dotta 0808b388ee [codex] Add source-scoped recovery actions (#5599) 
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is a control plane for autonomous AI companies, where work
must end with a clear disposition rather than ambiguous agent liveness.
> - Recovery currently detects stalled or missing-next-step issues, but
source issue recovery can become split across child recovery issues,
blockers, and comments.
> - That makes it harder for operators and agents to see who owns
recovery and what exact action is needed on the original issue.
> - Source-scoped recovery actions give the original issue a first-class
active recovery state with owner, evidence, wake policy, and resolution
outcome.
> - This pull request adds the recovery-action data model, backend
reconciliation and resolution APIs, and board UI indicators/actions.
> - The benefit is clearer stalled-work recovery without losing source
issue context or relying on comments as the liveness path.

## What Changed

- Added the `issue_recovery_actions` schema, shared
types/constants/validators, and an idempotent
`0084_issue_recovery_actions` migration ordered after current `master`
migrations.
- Updated stranded/missing-disposition recovery to create source-scoped
recovery actions, wake the recovery owner on the source issue, and avoid
locking the source issue for recovery-action wakes.
- Added API support for reading active recovery actions on issue
detail/list surfaces and resolving them with restored, blocked,
cancelled, or false-positive outcomes.
- Require blocked recovery resolutions to have an unresolved first-class
blocker, and removed the UI shortcut that could mark recovery blocked
without a blocker selection path.
- Surfaced recovery indicators/actions in the issue UI, blocker notices,
active run panels, issue rows, and Storybook coverage.
- Updated docs and focused tests for recovery semantics, ownership,
races, stale comments, and UI behavior.

## Verification

- `pnpm exec vitest run
server/src/__tests__/issue-recovery-actions.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-process-recovery.test.ts
ui/src/components/IssueRecoveryActionCard.test.tsx
ui/src/components/IssueBlockedNotice.test.tsx ui/src/api/issues.test.ts`
— 5 files, 72 tests passed.
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/shared typecheck` — passed.
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/db typecheck` — passed, including
migration numbering check.
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck` — passed.
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck` — passed.
- Follow-up verification after blocker-resolution guard: `pnpm exec
vitest run server/src/__tests__/issue-recovery-actions.test.ts
ui/src/components/IssueRecoveryActionCard.test.tsx
ui/src/api/issues.test.ts` — 3 files, 27 tests passed.
- Follow-up `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck` — passed.
- Follow-up `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck` — passed.
- UI states are available in
`ui/storybook/stories/source-issue-recovery.stories.tsx`; screenshot
capture helper is `scripts/screenshot-recovery-card.cjs`.

## Risks

- Medium: recovery behavior changes from child recovery issue ownership
toward source-scoped actions, so operators may see stalled-work state in
new places.
- Migration risk is mitigated by using the next migration slot after
`master` and making the table/constraints/index creation idempotent for
anyone who previously applied the old branch-local
`0082_dizzy_master_mold` migration.
- Existing child recovery issue paths are still guarded for
already-created recovery issues, but new source-scoped flows should be
watched in CI and Greptile review.

> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.

## Model Used

- OpenAI Codex, GPT-5 coding agent, tool use enabled for shell, Git,
GitHub, and local test execution. Context window not exposed by the
runtime.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
 2026-05-12 09:37:15 -05:00
Devin Foley c445e59256 fix(ui): fix message attribution for agent-posted comments with user author IDs (#5780) 
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip’s issue chat is an audit surface: reviewers need to trust
who actually authored a message.
> - Some historical agent comments were persisted with `authorUserId`
and no surviving `createdByRunId`, so the UI rendered real agent output
as if it came from the board user.
> - A pure timestamp-window fallback is too risky because human
reviewers can comment while agents are running.
> - The safe recovery path is to derive attribution only when the server
can prove it from same-issue run logs that include the exact posted
comment id, then let the chat renderer prefer that recovered agent
attribution.
> - This keeps historical threads trustworthy without mutating old
database rows or guessing in ambiguous cases.

## What Changed

- Added shared `IssueComment` fields for derived attribution so server
and UI can carry recovered `derivedAuthorAgentId`,
`derivedCreatedByRunId`, and `derivedAuthorSource` consistently.
- Added server-side attribution recovery in
`server/src/services/issues.ts` that reads same-issue run logs and only
derives agent authorship when a run log contains the exact `comment id:
...` emitted during posting.
- Updated issue chat rendering in `ui/src/lib/issue-chat-messages.ts` to
prefer direct agent authorship, then activity-log `runAgentId`, then the
server-derived attribution.
- Removed the unsafe UI-only run-window fallback from
`ui/src/pages/IssueDetail.tsx` so human comments posted during an active
run are not silently relabeled as agent output.
- Added regression coverage for both the run-log derivation path and the
chat-rendering fallback behavior.
- Bounded server-side run-log enrichment to 8 concurrent reads per
request and removed the unused `issueCommentSchema` declaration during
PR cleanup.

## Verification

- `pnpm exec vitest run ui/src/lib/issue-chat-messages.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/issues-service.test.ts`
- `pnpm test:run:general`
- Live validation on May 12, 2026 in `PAPA-322`: confirmed the
previously misattributed historical comments on `PAPA-316` now render as
Claude-authored on `http://goldie.gerbil-company.ts.net:3100`.
- Reviewer check: open `PAPA-316` in the running instance and confirm
historical comments such as `## Investigation: exe.dev 422 + codex
re-test` render under Claude instead of the board user.

## Risks

- Low risk. The change is scoped to comment attribution recovery and
rendering.
- Derived attribution is intentionally conservative: if there is no
exact run-log proof, the comment remains user-authored instead of
guessing.
- Run-log recovery depends on retained same-issue logs, so older
comments without that evidence remain unchanged.

## Model Used

- OpenAI Codex via the Paperclip `codex_local` adapter (GPT-5-class
coding agent with tool use in the local Paperclip runtime; the exact
deployment/model ID is not surfaced by this workspace).

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [ ] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots
- [ ] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
 2026-05-12 01:20:49 -07:00
Devin Foley ad0bb57350 Fix exe.dev sandbox installs for gemini/opencode local adapters (#5737) 
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies, including
running adapter CLIs inside remote sandboxes
> - The QA matrix in PAPA-316 spins up local-runtime adapters
(claude/gemini/opencode) against both SSH and the new exe.dev sandbox
provider, and "Test" exercises the same install + probe path the real
runtime uses
> - On exe.dev the QA matrix failed at three different points:
SSH/sandbox secret refs would not resolve, gemini-local could not find
npm, and opencode-local installed a binary that was not on the
probe-shell PATH
> - These are all environment-shape issues the runtime should handle,
not regressions in any individual adapter, so they need to be fixed in
the shared install/resolve layer before the matrix can pass
> - This pull request wires the environment id through to secret-ref
resolution, bootstraps npm from a portable Node tarball when the sandbox
image lacks Node, and symlinks the opencode binary into a directory that
non-login shells see
> - The benefit is that the QA matrix passes end-to-end on exe.dev, and
any future sandbox provider that ships without Node or relies on rc-file
PATH wiring gets the same fixes for free

## What Changed

- `server/src/services/environment-execution-target.ts`: pass the
environment `id` into `resolveEnvironmentDriverConfigForRuntime` for
both the sandbox and SSH branches, so `privateKeySecretRef` /
sandbox-provider secret refs (e.g. exe.dev `apiKey`) can resolve against
the secret store at runtime instead of throwing `Runtime secret
resolution requires an environment id`.
- `packages/adapter-utils/src/sandbox-install-command.ts`: extend
`buildSandboxNpmInstallCommand` with an `ENSURE_NPM_PREAMBLE` that, when
`npm` is missing, downloads a portable Node v22 tarball into
`$HOME/.local` and sets `PAPERCLIP_NPM_BOOTSTRAPPED=1` so the install
step skips sudo (sudo's `secure_path` would lose the freshly-installed
`npm` in `$HOME/.local/bin`). Distro-packaged Node from apt-get is
intentionally avoided because it tends to be too old to parse modern JS
syntax used by `@google/gemini-cli`.
- `packages/adapters/gemini-local/src/index.ts`: switch the hardcoded
`npm install -g @google/gemini-cli` to `buildSandboxNpmInstallCommand`,
so gemini-local picks up the same sudo-aware + npm-bootstrap behavior as
the other local adapters.
- `packages/adapters/opencode-local/src/index.ts`: append a step to the
install command that symlinks `$HOME/.opencode/bin/opencode` into
`$HOME/.local/bin`. The upstream installer only adds `~/.opencode/bin`
to PATH via `~/.bashrc`, which non-login `sh -c` probe invocations do
not source.
- `packages/adapter-utils/src/sandbox-install-command.test.ts`: cover
the new preamble plus the unchanged root/sudo/user-prefix branches.

## Verification

- `cd packages/adapter-utils && npm test -- sandbox-install-command`
(passes; new "bootstraps npm from a portable Node tarball when missing"
case is included).
- Manual: ran the in-app `Test` action against the QA matrix dev
instance for `QA exe.dev Claude`, `QA exe.dev Gemini`, and `QA exe.dev
OpenCode` — all three now report `status=pass` including the hello
probe. `QA SSH Claude` also passes; without the environment-id fix, SSH
resolution threw before the wrapper / install fixes could run.
- Suggested reviewer check: re-run the matrix on a fresh exe.dev
environment and confirm the install step no longer hits `npm: command
not found` for gemini and the opencode probe no longer hits `opencode:
command not found`.

## Risks

- Low/medium. The npm bootstrap pins Node `v22.11.0` from
`nodejs.org/dist`; if that URL becomes unreachable the install will fail
with a clear `curl` error rather than corrupting state. The bootstrap
path is only taken when `npm` is genuinely missing, so existing sandbox
images that ship with Node are unaffected.
- The opencode symlink uses `ln -sf` into `$HOME/.local/bin`, which is
created with `mkdir -p`; idempotent on re-install.
- The `id` change is a strict additive: callers previously got
`undefined` and only the secret-ref code paths actually read it. No
behavior change for environments without secret refs.

## Model Used

- Claude (Anthropic), `claude-opus-4-7`, with extended thinking and tool
use enabled. Iterated through the Paperclip QA matrix harness; no other
model assisted.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [ ] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots (n/a — runtime/install path only)
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
 2026-05-11 14:28:22 -07:00