## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The skills layout separates runtime Paperclip skills in `skills/` from maintainer/agent workflow skills in `.agents/skills/`. > - Three maintainer workflow skills still lived under root `skills/`, making them look like runtime skills shipped through the Paperclip skill path. > - Root `skills/` is documented as reserved for Paperclip runtime skills, so these task-oriented maintainer skills belong with the other `.agents/skills` entries. > - This pull request moves the three requested skill packages, updates the direct smoke path, and adds regression coverage for the maintainer-only skill boundary. > - The benefit is a cleaner skills boundary without changing skill contents or runtime behavior. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Internal Paperclip issue: PAP-10471. No public GitHub issue exists for this repository-maintenance change. Inline feature/enhancement issue description follows the feature request template fields: ### Problem or motivation Root `skills/` is documented as reserved for Paperclip runtime skills, but `terminal-bench-loop`, `paperclip-create-plugin`, and `diagnose-why-work-stopped` lived there even though they are maintainer/agent workflow skills. ### Proposed solution Move those three skill packages to `.agents/skills/`, update the terminal-bench loop smoke script to read the new local path, and cover the moved skill names in the existing runtime-skill discovery test fixture. ### Alternatives considered Leaving the skills in root `skills/` would preserve direct old paths, but it keeps blurring the runtime-skill boundary. Moving them into the app-shipped skills catalog would be the wrong fit because these are maintainer workflow skills, not bundled company skills. ### Roadmap alignment This is a small maintenance cleanup around the existing Skills Manager/workflow-skill organization and does not introduce a roadmap-level core feature. ## What Changed - Moved `terminal-bench-loop`, `paperclip-create-plugin`, and `diagnose-why-work-stopped` into `.agents/skills/`. - Updated the terminal-bench loop smoke script and skill self-check text to use `.agents/skills/terminal-bench-loop/SKILL.md`. - Added regression coverage in `server/src/__tests__/paperclip-skill-utils.test.ts` that places these three skills under `.agents/skills` while asserting runtime discovery still lists only root runtime skills. ## Verification - `pnpm smoke:terminal-bench-loop-skill --source-issue-id "$PAPERCLIP_TASK_ID" --run-key PAP-10471-move-skill-path` - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/paperclip-skill-utils.test.ts` - `rg -n "skills/(terminal-bench-loop|paperclip-create-plugin|diagnose-why-work-stopped)" . --glob '!node_modules' --glob '!dist' --glob '!ui/dist'` returned no matches. ## Risks - Low risk: this is a file-location change plus direct path/test updates. - Maintainer agents that referenced the old root paths directly will need to use `.agents/skills/...` instead. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex, GPT-5 coding agent with shell/tool use. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge
6.6 KiB
name, description
| name | description |
|---|---|
| paperclip-create-plugin | Create and develop external Paperclip plugins with the CLI-first workflow. Use when scaffolding a new plugin, working on a local plugin against a running Paperclip instance, or updating plugin authoring docs. Covers `paperclipai plugin init`, the local install loop via `paperclipai plugin install <path>`, worker/UI rebuild and reload semantics, and the required success checklist. |
Create and develop a Paperclip plugin
Use this skill when the task is to create, scaffold, or iterate on a Paperclip plugin against a local Paperclip instance.
1. Default: build the plugin OUTSIDE Paperclip core
Plugins are their own packages. Unless the task explicitly asks for a bundled in-repo example, do not add plugin source under packages/plugins/ in this repo.
- Scaffold the plugin into a directory outside the Paperclip checkout (e.g.
~/dev/paperclip-plugins/<name>). - Install it into the running Paperclip instance by local absolute path.
- Edit code in the external package; let Paperclip pick up rebuilt output.
Only edit Paperclip core itself when the user asks to surface a plugin as a bundled example (server/src/routes/plugins.ts, in-repo example lists, docs).
2. Ground rules
Reference docs when you need detail:
doc/plugins/PLUGIN_AUTHORING_GUIDE.mdpackages/plugins/sdk/README.mddoc/plugins/PLUGIN_SPEC.md— future-looking context only
Current runtime assumptions:
- plugin workers are trusted code
- plugin UI is trusted same-origin host code
- worker APIs are capability-gated
- plugin UI is not sandboxed by manifest capabilities
- no host-provided shared plugin UI component kit yet
ctx.assetsis not supported in the current runtime
3. CLI-first scaffold workflow
Use paperclipai plugin init. Do not invoke the scaffold package node entrypoint by hand unless the CLI command is unavailable in the environment.
paperclipai plugin init @acme/my-plugin --output ~/dev/paperclip-plugins
Useful flags (all optional):
--output <dir>— parent directory; the command creates<dir>/<unscoped-name>/. Defaults to the current directory.--template <default|connector|workspace|environment>— starter template.--category <connector|workspace|automation|ui|environment>— manifest category.--display-name <name>,--description <text>,--author <name>— manifest metadata.--sdk-path <path>— snapshot the local SDK from a Paperclip checkout into.paperclip-sdk/(useful when developing against an unreleased SDK).
On success the command prints the exact next commands (cd, pnpm install, pnpm dev, paperclipai plugin install <abs-path>). Run them in order.
If paperclipai is not on PATH in your environment, fall back to:
pnpm --filter @paperclipai/create-paperclip-plugin build
node packages/plugins/create-paperclip-plugin/dist/index.js @acme/my-plugin \
--output /absolute/path \
--sdk-path /absolute/path/to/paperclip/packages/plugins/sdk
4. Local install + rebuild loop
In the scaffolded plugin folder:
pnpm install
pnpm dev # esbuild --watch: rebuilds dist/manifest.js, dist/worker.js, dist/ui/
paperclipai plugin install /absolute/path/to/my-plugin
Notes:
paperclipai plugin installauto-detects local paths (absolute,./,../,~, or an existing relative folder) and forwardsisLocalPath: trueto the server. Pass--localto force local mode if the heuristic is ambiguous.- Paths are resolved to absolute paths before being sent to the server.
- The server watches built outputs (
dist/) for local-path plugins and restarts the plugin worker on rebuild — you do not need to reinstall after every edit. - UI hot reload via the SDK dev server (
pnpm dev:ui, port4177) is optional and template-dependent; only mention it if the template wiresdevUiUrland you verified it works end to end. --versiononly applies to npm package installs. Combining it with a local path is an error.
After install, inspect with:
paperclipai plugin list
paperclipai plugin inspect <plugin-key>
5. After scaffolding, sanity-check the package
Open and confirm:
src/manifest.ts— declared capabilities and slotssrc/worker.ts— worker entrysrc/ui/index.tsx— UI entry (if applicable)tests/plugin.spec.ts— placeholder testpackage.json—paperclipPluginblock points atdist/manifest.js,dist/worker.js,dist/ui/
Make sure the plugin:
- declares only supported capabilities
- does not use
ctx.assets - does not import host UI component stubs
- keeps UI self-contained
- uses
routePathonly onpageslots
6. Verification (run before declaring success)
From the plugin folder:
pnpm typecheck
pnpm test
pnpm build
If the plugin is already running under pnpm dev, you can keep the watcher up and run pnpm typecheck and pnpm test in a separate shell.
If you changed Paperclip SDK/host/plugin runtime code in addition to the plugin, also run the relevant Paperclip workspace checks.
7. Success checklist (report this back)
When you finish a local plugin task, report:
- Scaffold path — absolute path of the created plugin folder.
- Commands run — the exact
paperclipai plugin init,pnpm install,pnpm dev,paperclipai plugin install <path>invocations (and any verification commands). - Install status — output of
paperclipai plugin list/plugin inspect(plugin key, version, status). Note ifstatusis anything other thanreadyand includelastError. - Tests / build result —
pnpm typecheck,pnpm test,pnpm buildpass/fail with the failing output if any. - Reload limitations — call out anything that did not hot-reload (e.g. manifest changes required a reinstall, UI dev server was not wired, etc.).
If any item is missing, mark it as such — do not silently skip.
8. When NOT to edit Paperclip core
Do not add the plugin under packages/plugins/ or update bundled-example wiring unless the user explicitly asks for a bundled example. Local-path installs are the supported development model; npm packages are the production deployment path.
If the user does ask for a bundled example, also update:
server/src/routes/plugins.tsexample list- any docs that enumerate in-repo example plugins
9. Documentation expectations
When authoring or updating plugin docs:
- distinguish current implementation from future spec ideas
- be explicit about the trusted-code model
- do not promise host UI components or asset APIs
- prefer local-path development + npm-package deployment guidance over repo-local workflows