32a9165ddf
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies > - The control plane depends on authenticated routes enforcing company boundaries and role permissions correctly > - This branch also touches the issue detail and markdown editing flows operators use while handling advisory and triage work > - Partial issue cache seeds and fragile rich-editor parsing could leave important issue content missing or blank at the moment an operator needed it > - Blocked issues becoming actionable again should wake their assignee automatically instead of silently staying idle > - This pull request rebases the advisory follow-up branch onto current `master`, hardens authenticated route authorization, and carries the issue-detail/editor reliability fixes forward with regression tests > - The benefit is tighter authz on sensitive routes plus more reliable issue/advisory editing and wakeup behavior on top of the latest base ## What Changed - Hardened authenticated route authorization across agent, activity, approval, access, project, plugin, health, execution-workspace, portability, and related server paths, with new cross-tenant and runtime-authz regression coverage. - Switched issue detail queries from `initialData` to placeholder-based hydration so list/quicklook seeds still refetch full issue bodies. - Normalized advisory-style HTML images before mounting the markdown editor and strengthened fallback behavior when the rich editor silently fails or rejects the content. - Woke assigned agents when blocked issues move back to `todo`, with route coverage for reopen and unblock transitions. - Rebasing note: this branch now sits cleanly on top of the latest `master` tip used for the PR base. ## Verification - `pnpm exec vitest run ui/src/lib/issueDetailQuery.test.tsx ui/src/components/MarkdownEditor.test.tsx server/src/__tests__/issue-comment-reopen-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/activity-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/agent-cross-tenant-authz-routes.test.ts` - Confirmed `pnpm-lock.yaml` is not part of the PR diff. - Rebased the branch onto current `public-gh/master` before publishing. ## Risks - Broad authz tightening may expose existing flows that were relying on permissive board or agent access and now need explicit grants. - Markdown editor fallback changes could affect focus or rendering in edge-case content that mixes HTML-like advisory markup with normal markdown. - This verification was intentionally scoped to touched regressions and did not run the full repository suite. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex, GPT-5-based coding agent in the Codex CLI environment with tool use for terminal, git, and GitHub operations. The exact runtime model identifier is not exposed inside this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] If this change affects the UI, it is behavior-only and does not need before/after screenshots - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes, or no documentation changes were needed for these internal fixes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
120 lines
3.4 KiB
TypeScript
120 lines
3.4 KiB
TypeScript
import express from "express";
|
|
import request from "supertest";
|
|
import { beforeEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from "vitest";
|
|
|
|
const mockActivityService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
|
list: vi.fn(),
|
|
forIssue: vi.fn(),
|
|
runsForIssue: vi.fn(),
|
|
issuesForRun: vi.fn(),
|
|
create: vi.fn(),
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
const mockHeartbeatService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
|
getRun: vi.fn(),
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
const mockIssueService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
|
getById: vi.fn(),
|
|
getByIdentifier: vi.fn(),
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
vi.mock("../services/activity.js", () => ({
|
|
activityService: () => mockActivityService,
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
vi.mock("../services/index.js", () => ({
|
|
issueService: () => mockIssueService,
|
|
heartbeatService: () => mockHeartbeatService,
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
async function createApp(
|
|
actor: Record<string, unknown> = {
|
|
type: "board",
|
|
userId: "user-1",
|
|
companyIds: ["company-1"],
|
|
source: "session",
|
|
isInstanceAdmin: false,
|
|
},
|
|
) {
|
|
const [{ errorHandler }, { activityRoutes }] = await Promise.all([
|
|
import("../middleware/index.js"),
|
|
import("../routes/activity.js"),
|
|
]);
|
|
const app = express();
|
|
app.use(express.json());
|
|
app.use((req, _res, next) => {
|
|
(req as any).actor = actor;
|
|
next();
|
|
});
|
|
app.use("/api", activityRoutes({} as any));
|
|
app.use(errorHandler);
|
|
return app;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
describe("activity routes", () => {
|
|
beforeEach(() => {
|
|
vi.resetModules();
|
|
vi.clearAllMocks();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("resolves issue identifiers before loading runs", async () => {
|
|
mockIssueService.getByIdentifier.mockResolvedValue({
|
|
id: "issue-uuid-1",
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
});
|
|
mockActivityService.runsForIssue.mockResolvedValue([
|
|
{
|
|
runId: "run-1",
|
|
adapterType: "codex_local",
|
|
},
|
|
]);
|
|
|
|
const app = await createApp();
|
|
const res = await request(app).get("/api/issues/PAP-475/runs");
|
|
|
|
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
|
|
expect(mockIssueService.getByIdentifier).toHaveBeenCalledWith("PAP-475");
|
|
expect(mockIssueService.getById).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
|
|
expect(mockActivityService.runsForIssue).toHaveBeenCalledWith("company-1", "issue-uuid-1");
|
|
expect(res.body).toEqual([{ runId: "run-1", adapterType: "codex_local" }]);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("requires company access before creating activity events", async () => {
|
|
const app = await createApp();
|
|
const res = await request(app)
|
|
.post("/api/companies/company-2/activity")
|
|
.send({
|
|
actorId: "user-1",
|
|
action: "test.event",
|
|
entityType: "issue",
|
|
entityId: "issue-1",
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(res.status).toBe(403);
|
|
expect(mockActivityService.create).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("requires company access before listing issues for another company's run", async () => {
|
|
mockHeartbeatService.getRun.mockResolvedValue({
|
|
id: "run-2",
|
|
companyId: "company-2",
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const app = await createApp();
|
|
const res = await request(app).get("/api/heartbeat-runs/run-2/issues");
|
|
|
|
expect(res.status).toBe(403);
|
|
expect(mockActivityService.issuesForRun).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("rejects anonymous heartbeat run issue lookups before run existence checks", async () => {
|
|
const app = await createApp({ type: "none", source: "none" });
|
|
const res = await request(app).get("/api/heartbeat-runs/missing-run/issues");
|
|
|
|
expect(res.status).toBe(401);
|
|
expect(mockHeartbeatService.getRun).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
|
|
expect(mockActivityService.issuesForRun).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
|
|
});
|
|
});
|