Files
paperclip/server/src/__tests__/project-routes-env.test.ts
T
Dotta dbebf30c89 Add low-trust review containment (#7530)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is a control plane for AI-agent companies, so execution
policy and trust boundaries are part of the product's safety contract.
> - Low-trust review work needs narrower authority than normal
same-company agents because hostile PRs, comments, attachments, and
generated output can carry prompt-injection payloads.
> - The current V1 shape gives trusted workers broad company context,
which is useful for normal execution but too permissive for a reviewer
assigned to hostile content.
> - This branch adds a `low_trust_review` preset, source-trust tagging,
route-level containment, and quarantine handling so low-trust output
does not automatically flow into higher-trust wake context.
> - The branch has been rebased onto current `origin/master`, and the
low-trust migration was renumbered to `0097_low_trust_source_trust.sql`
to avoid collisions with existing `0091` through `0096` migrations.
> - Greptile feedback was addressed by tightening low-trust detection,
preserving project-level trust policy checks, fixing issue-kind
promotion lookup, removing duplicate post-lease isolation assertion,
documenting fail-closed source-trust behavior, bounding ancestry checks,
enforcing runtime issue context for CEOs, awaiting accepted-plan monitor
authorization, and making low-trust issue source-trust tagging atomic.
> - The benefit is a first production slice of deny-by-default review
containment with regression coverage for the main control-plane pivot
surfaces.

Fixes #7531.

## What Changed

- Added shared trust-policy types and validators, plus
database/source-trust fields for issues, comments, documents, and work
products.
- Implemented server enforcement for low-trust issue scope, agent
self-view redaction, secret/plugin/runtime denial paths, promotion
checks, and quarantined continuation/wake context.
- Added focused low-trust regression tests for resolver behavior, source
trust, route authorization, heartbeat preflight ordering, runtime
containment, and quarantine redaction.
- Added board UI affordances for selecting/reviewing the low-trust
preset and surfacing source-trust badges in relevant issue views.
- Added `doc/LOW-TRUST-PRESETS.md`, updated
`doc/SPEC-implementation.md`, and committed the low-trust review
contract plan under `doc/plans/`.
- Rebasing note: the original `0097_low_trust_source_trust.sql`
migration was renamed to `0097_low_trust_source_trust.sql`; the SQL uses
`ADD COLUMN IF NOT EXISTS` so users who already applied the old-numbered
migration are not broken by the renumbered migration.

## Verification

- Rebased branch onto current `origin/master` and force-pushed with
lease to `origin/PAP-10211-low-trust-agent` at head `2719f31e3`.
- Confirmed the PR diff does not include `pnpm-lock.yaml` or
`.github/workflows` changes.
- Resolved upstream UI/comment conflicts by preserving deleted-comment
tombstone behavior and low-trust source-trust badges/metadata.
- Renumbered the low-trust source-trust migration to
`0097_low_trust_source_trust.sql`; the SQL uses `ADD COLUMN IF NOT
EXISTS` so users who already applied an old-numbered copy are not
broken.
- `pnpm exec vitest run ui/src/lib/issue-chat-messages.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-workspace-session.test.ts`
- `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/source-trust.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/workspace-runtime-service-authz.test.ts
ui/src/lib/trust-policy-ui.test.ts
ui/src/components/TrustPresetSection.test.tsx`
- `pnpm run typecheck:build-gaps`
- `git diff --check`
- GitHub checks pass on head `2719f31e3`: build, typecheck/release
registry, general tests, serialized server suites, e2e, canary, verify,
policy/review, Socket, and Snyk.
- Greptile Review passes with Confidence Score 5/5 and zero unresolved
Greptile review threads.
- No design screenshots/images were added because the task explicitly
says not to add them unless they are specifically part of the work.

## Risks

- Medium risk: this touches shared trust-policy contracts, server
authorization paths, heartbeat context generation, migration metadata,
and UI preset controls.
- Low-trust containment is intentionally deny-by-default; legitimate
future review workflows may need explicit allowlisted exceptions.
- Plugin/runtime/security surfaces are broad, so regression tests cover
the current known routes but future integrations must route through the
same containment layer.
- The PR is ready for review; GitHub checks are green and Greptile is
5/5.

> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.

## Model Used

- OpenAI Codex, GPT-5 coding agent, tool-enabled shell and GitHub CLI
workflow.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] UI changes are covered by focused tests; no screenshots were added
per task instruction not to add design images unless specifically
required
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-06-05 16:48:02 -05:00

234 lines
6.9 KiB
TypeScript

import express from "express";
import request from "supertest";
import { beforeEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from "vitest";
const mockProjectService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
list: vi.fn(),
getById: vi.fn(),
create: vi.fn(),
update: vi.fn(),
createWorkspace: vi.fn(),
listWorkspaces: vi.fn(),
updateWorkspace: vi.fn(),
removeWorkspace: vi.fn(),
remove: vi.fn(),
resolveByReference: vi.fn(),
}));
const mockSecretService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
normalizeEnvBindingsForPersistence: vi.fn(),
}));
const mockEnvironmentService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
getById: vi.fn(),
}));
const mockWorkspaceOperationService = vi.hoisted(() => ({}));
const mockLogActivity = vi.hoisted(() => vi.fn());
const mockGetTelemetryClient = vi.hoisted(() => vi.fn());
const mockAccessService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
decide: vi.fn(),
}));
vi.mock("../telemetry.js", () => ({
getTelemetryClient: mockGetTelemetryClient,
}));
vi.mock("../services/index.js", () => ({
accessService: () => mockAccessService,
environmentService: () => mockEnvironmentService,
logActivity: mockLogActivity,
projectService: () => mockProjectService,
secretService: () => mockSecretService,
workspaceOperationService: () => mockWorkspaceOperationService,
}));
vi.mock("../services/environments.js", () => ({
environmentService: () => mockEnvironmentService,
}));
vi.mock("../services/secrets.js", () => ({
secretService: () => mockSecretService,
}));
vi.mock("../services/workspace-runtime.js", () => ({
startRuntimeServicesForWorkspaceControl: vi.fn(),
stopRuntimeServicesForProjectWorkspace: vi.fn(),
}));
function registerModuleMocks() {
vi.doMock("../telemetry.js", () => ({
getTelemetryClient: mockGetTelemetryClient,
}));
vi.doMock("../services/index.js", () => ({
accessService: () => mockAccessService,
environmentService: () => mockEnvironmentService,
logActivity: mockLogActivity,
projectService: () => mockProjectService,
secretService: () => mockSecretService,
workspaceOperationService: () => mockWorkspaceOperationService,
}));
vi.doMock("../services/environments.js", () => ({
environmentService: () => mockEnvironmentService,
}));
vi.doMock("../services/secrets.js", () => ({
secretService: () => mockSecretService,
}));
vi.doMock("../services/workspace-runtime.js", () => ({
startRuntimeServicesForWorkspaceControl: vi.fn(),
stopRuntimeServicesForProjectWorkspace: vi.fn(),
}));
}
async function createApp() {
const [{ projectRoutes }, { errorHandler }] = await Promise.all([
vi.importActual<typeof import("../routes/projects.js")>("../routes/projects.js"),
vi.importActual<typeof import("../middleware/index.js")>("../middleware/index.js"),
]);
const app = express();
app.use(express.json());
app.use((req, _res, next) => {
(req as any).actor = {
type: "board",
userId: "board-user",
companyIds: ["company-1"],
source: "local_implicit",
isInstanceAdmin: false,
};
next();
});
app.use("/api", projectRoutes({} as any));
app.use(errorHandler);
return app;
}
function buildProject(overrides: Record<string, unknown> = {}) {
return {
id: "project-1",
companyId: "company-1",
urlKey: "project-1",
goalId: null,
goalIds: [],
goals: [],
name: "Project",
description: null,
status: "backlog",
leadAgentId: null,
targetDate: null,
color: null,
env: null,
pauseReason: null,
pausedAt: null,
executionWorkspacePolicy: null,
codebase: {
workspaceId: null,
repoUrl: null,
repoRef: null,
defaultRef: null,
repoName: null,
localFolder: null,
managedFolder: "/tmp/project",
effectiveLocalFolder: "/tmp/project",
origin: "managed_checkout",
},
workspaces: [],
primaryWorkspace: null,
archivedAt: null,
createdAt: new Date(),
updatedAt: new Date(),
...overrides,
};
}
describe("project env routes", () => {
beforeEach(() => {
vi.resetModules();
vi.doUnmock("../routes/projects.js");
vi.doUnmock("../routes/authz.js");
vi.doUnmock("../middleware/index.js");
vi.doUnmock("../services/environments.js");
vi.doUnmock("../services/secrets.js");
registerModuleMocks();
vi.clearAllMocks();
mockAccessService.decide.mockResolvedValue({
allowed: true,
action: "project:read",
reason: "allow_test",
explanation: "Allowed by test mock.",
});
mockGetTelemetryClient.mockReturnValue({ track: vi.fn() });
mockProjectService.resolveByReference.mockResolvedValue({ ambiguous: false, project: null });
mockProjectService.createWorkspace.mockResolvedValue(null);
mockProjectService.listWorkspaces.mockResolvedValue([]);
mockEnvironmentService.getById.mockReset();
mockSecretService.normalizeEnvBindingsForPersistence.mockImplementation(async (_companyId, env) => env);
});
it("normalizes env bindings on create and logs only env keys", async () => {
const normalizedEnv = {
API_KEY: {
type: "secret_ref",
secretId: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
version: "latest",
},
};
mockSecretService.normalizeEnvBindingsForPersistence.mockResolvedValue(normalizedEnv);
mockProjectService.create.mockResolvedValue(buildProject({ env: normalizedEnv }));
const app = await createApp();
const res = await request(app)
.post("/api/companies/company-1/projects")
.send({
name: "Project",
env: normalizedEnv,
});
expect([200, 201], JSON.stringify(res.body)).toContain(res.status);
expect(mockSecretService.normalizeEnvBindingsForPersistence).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
"company-1",
normalizedEnv,
expect.objectContaining({ fieldPath: "env" }),
);
expect(mockProjectService.create).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
"company-1",
expect.objectContaining({ env: normalizedEnv }),
);
expect(mockLogActivity).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
expect.anything(),
expect.objectContaining({
details: expect.objectContaining({
envKeys: ["API_KEY"],
}),
}),
);
});
it("normalizes env bindings on update and avoids logging raw values", async () => {
const normalizedEnv = {
PLAIN_KEY: { type: "plain", value: "top-secret" },
};
mockSecretService.normalizeEnvBindingsForPersistence.mockResolvedValue(normalizedEnv);
mockProjectService.getById.mockResolvedValue(buildProject());
mockProjectService.update.mockResolvedValue(buildProject({ env: normalizedEnv }));
const app = await createApp();
const res = await request(app)
.patch("/api/projects/project-1")
.send({
env: normalizedEnv,
});
expect(res.status, JSON.stringify(res.body)).toBe(200);
expect(mockLogActivity).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
expect.anything(),
expect.objectContaining({
details: {
changedKeys: ["env"],
envKeys: ["PLAIN_KEY"],
},
}),
);
});
});