Files
paperclip/server/src/__tests__/issue-update-comment-wakeup-routes.test.ts
T
Dotta 7fb40264f8 [codex] Revert PR #7678 (#7765)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Issue comment wake handoffs are part of the control-plane execution
loop that decides when agents resume work after comments and issue
updates.
> - PR #7678 changed that wake handoff behavior in server issue routes,
heartbeat context, and related tests.
> - The change broke an important workflow after merge, so the safest
immediate fix is to restore the pre-#7678 wake behavior.
> - This pull request reverts the wake-handoff behavior from PR #7678
while keeping narrow review-requested safeguards that prevent known
runtime/test regressions.
> - The benefit is that Paperclip returns to the last known working wake
behavior without reintroducing avoidable UUID skill lookup and
annotation-resolution test gaps.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs: #7678

Bug context:
- What happened: PR #7678 was reported to have broken an important
Paperclip workflow after it merged.
- Expected behavior: Paperclip should preserve the prior issue comment
wake handoff behavior until a corrected change is ready.
- Steps to reproduce: Use the workflow affected by PR #7678's issue
comment wake handoff changes.
- Paperclip version/commit: `master` after merge commit
`4da79a88c67e54084d40bd18cada5ee5c8be23da`.
- Deployment mode: Paperclip control-plane server behavior.

## What Changed

- Reverted merge commit `4da79a88c67e54084d40bd18cada5ee5c8be23da` from
PR #7678 to restore pre-#7678 wake-handoff behavior.
- Preserved the safe accepted-plan routing check so `parseObject(...)`
is not used as a boolean.
- Preserved UUID filtering for run-scoped skill mentions so legacy
non-UUID skill IDs do not reach a Postgres UUID lookup.
- Restored the annotation thread-resolution test guard that verifies
resolving a thread does not wake the assignee.

## Verification

- `pnpm run preflight:workspace-links && NODE_ENV=test
PAPERCLIP_HOME=/tmp/... PAPERCLIP_INSTANCE_ID=pap10614-revert
TMPDIR=/tmp/... pnpm exec vitest run --project @paperclipai/server
--no-file-parallelism --maxWorkers=1
server/src/__tests__/document-annotation-routes.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-project-env.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-accepted-plan-workspace-refresh.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-context-summary.test.ts`
- Result: 4 test files passed, 26 tests passed.
- Earlier targeted revert verification also passed: 4 test files, 50
tests.

## Risks

- This intentionally restores behavior from before PR #7678, so intended
wake-handoff improvements from that PR are removed.
- The PR is no longer a byte-for-byte revert because Greptile identified
two narrow safeguards worth preserving.
- Low migration risk: no schema or dependency changes are included.
- Follow-up work may still be needed to reintroduce the desired wake
handoff behavior without the regression.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, GPT-5 coding agent in this Paperclip heartbeat, with
shell/tool execution and repository write access.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
2026-06-08 10:35:58 -05:00

318 lines
10 KiB
TypeScript

import express from "express";
import request from "supertest";
import { beforeEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from "vitest";
const ASSIGNEE_AGENT_ID = "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111";
const mockIssueService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
getById: vi.fn(),
update: vi.fn(),
addComment: vi.fn(),
findMentionedAgents: vi.fn(),
getRelationSummaries: vi.fn(),
listWakeableBlockedDependents: vi.fn(),
getWakeableParentAfterChildCompletion: vi.fn(),
getCurrentScheduledRetry: vi.fn(),
}));
const mockHeartbeatService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
wakeup: vi.fn(async () => undefined),
reportRunActivity: vi.fn(async () => undefined),
getRun: vi.fn(async () => null),
getActiveRunForAgent: vi.fn(async () => null),
cancelRun: vi.fn(async () => null),
}));
const mockIssueThreadInteractionService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
expireRequestConfirmationsSupersededByComment: vi.fn(async () => []),
expireStaleRequestConfirmationsForIssueDocument: vi.fn(async () => []),
}));
vi.mock("../services/index.js", () => ({
companyService: () => ({
getById: vi.fn(async () => ({ id: "company-1", attachmentMaxBytes: 10 * 1024 * 1024 })),
}),
accessService: () => ({
canUser: vi.fn(async () => true),
decide: vi.fn(async (input: { action?: string }) => ({
allowed: true,
action: input.action,
reason: "allow_explicit_grant",
explanation: "Allowed by test grant.",
})),
hasPermission: vi.fn(async () => true),
}),
agentService: () => ({
getById: vi.fn(async () => null),
resolveByReference: vi.fn(async (_companyId: string, raw: string) => ({
ambiguous: false,
agent: { id: raw },
})),
}),
documentAnnotationService: () => ({ remapOpenThreadsForDocument: async () => [] }),
documentService: () => ({}),
executionWorkspaceService: () => ({}),
feedbackService: () => ({
listIssueVotesForUser: vi.fn(async () => []),
saveIssueVote: vi.fn(async () => ({ vote: null, consentEnabledNow: false, sharingEnabled: false })),
}),
goalService: () => ({}),
heartbeatService: () => mockHeartbeatService,
instanceSettingsService: () => ({
get: vi.fn(async () => ({
id: "instance-settings-1",
general: {
censorUsernameInLogs: false,
feedbackDataSharingPreference: "prompt",
},
})),
listCompanyIds: vi.fn(async () => ["company-1"]),
}),
issueApprovalService: () => ({}),
issueReferenceService: () => ({
deleteDocumentSource: async () => undefined,
diffIssueReferenceSummary: () => ({
addedReferencedIssues: [],
removedReferencedIssues: [],
currentReferencedIssues: [],
}),
emptySummary: () => ({ outbound: [], inbound: [] }),
listIssueReferenceSummary: async () => ({ outbound: [], inbound: [] }),
syncComment: async () => undefined,
syncDocument: async () => undefined,
syncIssue: async () => undefined,
}),
issueRecoveryActionService: () => ({
getActiveForIssue: vi.fn(async () => null),
listActiveForIssues: vi.fn(async () => new Map()),
}),
issueService: () => mockIssueService,
issueThreadInteractionService: () => mockIssueThreadInteractionService,
logActivity: vi.fn(async () => undefined),
projectService: () => ({}),
routineService: () => ({
syncRunStatusForIssue: vi.fn(async () => undefined),
}),
workProductService: () => ({}),
}));
function registerModuleMocks() {
vi.doMock("../services/index.js", () => ({
companyService: () => ({
getById: vi.fn(async () => ({ id: "company-1", attachmentMaxBytes: 10 * 1024 * 1024 })),
}),
accessService: () => ({
canUser: vi.fn(async () => true),
decide: vi.fn(async (input: { action?: string }) => ({
allowed: true,
action: input.action,
reason: "allow_explicit_grant",
explanation: "Allowed by test grant.",
})),
hasPermission: vi.fn(async () => true),
}),
agentService: () => ({
getById: vi.fn(async () => null),
resolveByReference: vi.fn(async (_companyId: string, raw: string) => ({
ambiguous: false,
agent: { id: raw },
})),
}),
documentAnnotationService: () => ({ remapOpenThreadsForDocument: async () => [] }),
documentService: () => ({}),
executionWorkspaceService: () => ({}),
feedbackService: () => ({
listIssueVotesForUser: vi.fn(async () => []),
saveIssueVote: vi.fn(async () => ({ vote: null, consentEnabledNow: false, sharingEnabled: false })),
}),
goalService: () => ({}),
heartbeatService: () => mockHeartbeatService,
instanceSettingsService: () => ({
get: vi.fn(async () => ({
id: "instance-settings-1",
general: {
censorUsernameInLogs: false,
feedbackDataSharingPreference: "prompt",
},
})),
listCompanyIds: vi.fn(async () => ["company-1"]),
}),
issueApprovalService: () => ({}),
issueReferenceService: () => ({
deleteDocumentSource: async () => undefined,
diffIssueReferenceSummary: () => ({
addedReferencedIssues: [],
removedReferencedIssues: [],
currentReferencedIssues: [],
}),
emptySummary: () => ({ outbound: [], inbound: [] }),
listIssueReferenceSummary: async () => ({ outbound: [], inbound: [] }),
syncComment: async () => undefined,
syncDocument: async () => undefined,
syncIssue: async () => undefined,
}),
issueRecoveryActionService: () => ({
getActiveForIssue: vi.fn(async () => null),
listActiveForIssues: vi.fn(async () => new Map()),
}),
issueService: () => mockIssueService,
issueThreadInteractionService: () => mockIssueThreadInteractionService,
logActivity: vi.fn(async () => undefined),
projectService: () => ({}),
routineService: () => ({
syncRunStatusForIssue: vi.fn(async () => undefined),
}),
workProductService: () => ({}),
}));
}
async function createApp() {
const [{ errorHandler }, { issueRoutes }] = await Promise.all([
vi.importActual<typeof import("../middleware/index.js")>("../middleware/index.js"),
vi.importActual<typeof import("../routes/issues.js")>("../routes/issues.js"),
]);
const app = express();
app.use(express.json());
app.use((req, _res, next) => {
(req as any).actor = {
type: "board",
userId: "local-board",
companyIds: ["company-1"],
source: "local_implicit",
isInstanceAdmin: false,
};
next();
});
app.use("/api", issueRoutes({} as any, {} as any));
app.use(errorHandler);
return app;
}
function makeIssue(overrides: Record<string, unknown> = {}) {
return {
id: "aaaaaaaa-aaaa-4aaa-8aaa-aaaaaaaaaaaa",
companyId: "company-1",
status: "todo",
priority: "medium",
projectId: null,
goalId: null,
parentId: null,
assigneeAgentId: null,
assigneeUserId: "local-board",
createdByUserId: "local-board",
identifier: "PAP-999",
title: "Wake test",
executionPolicy: null,
executionState: null,
hiddenAt: null,
...overrides,
};
}
describe("issue update comment wakeups", () => {
beforeEach(() => {
vi.resetModules();
vi.doUnmock("../routes/issues.js");
vi.doUnmock("../routes/authz.js");
vi.doUnmock("../middleware/index.js");
registerModuleMocks();
vi.clearAllMocks();
mockIssueService.findMentionedAgents.mockResolvedValue([]);
mockIssueService.getRelationSummaries.mockResolvedValue({ blockedBy: [], blocks: [] });
mockIssueService.listWakeableBlockedDependents.mockResolvedValue([]);
mockIssueService.getWakeableParentAfterChildCompletion.mockResolvedValue(null);
mockIssueService.getCurrentScheduledRetry.mockResolvedValue(null);
});
it("includes the new comment in assignment wakes from issue updates", async () => {
const existing = makeIssue();
const updated = makeIssue({
assigneeAgentId: ASSIGNEE_AGENT_ID,
assigneeUserId: null,
});
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue(existing);
mockIssueService.update.mockResolvedValue(updated);
mockIssueService.addComment.mockResolvedValue({
id: "comment-1",
issueId: existing.id,
companyId: existing.companyId,
body: "write the whole thing",
});
const res = await request(await createApp())
.patch(`/api/issues/${existing.id}`)
.send({
assigneeAgentId: ASSIGNEE_AGENT_ID,
assigneeUserId: null,
comment: "write the whole thing",
});
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
expect(mockHeartbeatService.wakeup).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
expect(mockHeartbeatService.wakeup).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
ASSIGNEE_AGENT_ID,
expect.objectContaining({
source: "assignment",
reason: "issue_assigned",
payload: expect.objectContaining({
issueId: existing.id,
commentId: "comment-1",
mutation: "update",
}),
contextSnapshot: expect.objectContaining({
issueId: existing.id,
taskId: existing.id,
commentId: "comment-1",
wakeCommentId: "comment-1",
source: "issue.update",
}),
}),
);
});
it("wakes the assignee on comment-only issue updates", async () => {
const existing = makeIssue({
assigneeAgentId: ASSIGNEE_AGENT_ID,
assigneeUserId: null,
status: "in_progress",
});
const updated = { ...existing };
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue(existing);
mockIssueService.update.mockResolvedValue(updated);
mockIssueService.addComment.mockResolvedValue({
id: "comment-2",
issueId: existing.id,
companyId: existing.companyId,
body: "please revise this",
});
const res = await request(await createApp())
.patch(`/api/issues/${existing.id}`)
.send({
comment: "please revise this",
});
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
expect(mockHeartbeatService.wakeup).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
expect(mockHeartbeatService.wakeup).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
ASSIGNEE_AGENT_ID,
expect.objectContaining({
source: "automation",
reason: "issue_commented",
payload: expect.objectContaining({
issueId: existing.id,
commentId: "comment-2",
mutation: "comment",
}),
contextSnapshot: expect.objectContaining({
issueId: existing.id,
taskId: existing.id,
commentId: "comment-2",
wakeCommentId: "comment-2",
wakeReason: "issue_commented",
source: "issue.comment",
}),
}),
);
});
});