dbebf30c89
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is a control plane for AI-agent companies, so execution policy and trust boundaries are part of the product's safety contract. > - Low-trust review work needs narrower authority than normal same-company agents because hostile PRs, comments, attachments, and generated output can carry prompt-injection payloads. > - The current V1 shape gives trusted workers broad company context, which is useful for normal execution but too permissive for a reviewer assigned to hostile content. > - This branch adds a `low_trust_review` preset, source-trust tagging, route-level containment, and quarantine handling so low-trust output does not automatically flow into higher-trust wake context. > - The branch has been rebased onto current `origin/master`, and the low-trust migration was renumbered to `0097_low_trust_source_trust.sql` to avoid collisions with existing `0091` through `0096` migrations. > - Greptile feedback was addressed by tightening low-trust detection, preserving project-level trust policy checks, fixing issue-kind promotion lookup, removing duplicate post-lease isolation assertion, documenting fail-closed source-trust behavior, bounding ancestry checks, enforcing runtime issue context for CEOs, awaiting accepted-plan monitor authorization, and making low-trust issue source-trust tagging atomic. > - The benefit is a first production slice of deny-by-default review containment with regression coverage for the main control-plane pivot surfaces. Fixes #7531. ## What Changed - Added shared trust-policy types and validators, plus database/source-trust fields for issues, comments, documents, and work products. - Implemented server enforcement for low-trust issue scope, agent self-view redaction, secret/plugin/runtime denial paths, promotion checks, and quarantined continuation/wake context. - Added focused low-trust regression tests for resolver behavior, source trust, route authorization, heartbeat preflight ordering, runtime containment, and quarantine redaction. - Added board UI affordances for selecting/reviewing the low-trust preset and surfacing source-trust badges in relevant issue views. - Added `doc/LOW-TRUST-PRESETS.md`, updated `doc/SPEC-implementation.md`, and committed the low-trust review contract plan under `doc/plans/`. - Rebasing note: the original `0097_low_trust_source_trust.sql` migration was renamed to `0097_low_trust_source_trust.sql`; the SQL uses `ADD COLUMN IF NOT EXISTS` so users who already applied the old-numbered migration are not broken by the renumbered migration. ## Verification - Rebased branch onto current `origin/master` and force-pushed with lease to `origin/PAP-10211-low-trust-agent` at head `2719f31e3`. - Confirmed the PR diff does not include `pnpm-lock.yaml` or `.github/workflows` changes. - Resolved upstream UI/comment conflicts by preserving deleted-comment tombstone behavior and low-trust source-trust badges/metadata. - Renumbered the low-trust source-trust migration to `0097_low_trust_source_trust.sql`; the SQL uses `ADD COLUMN IF NOT EXISTS` so users who already applied an old-numbered copy are not broken. - `pnpm exec vitest run ui/src/lib/issue-chat-messages.test.ts server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-workspace-session.test.ts` - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/source-trust.test.ts server/src/__tests__/workspace-runtime-service-authz.test.ts ui/src/lib/trust-policy-ui.test.ts ui/src/components/TrustPresetSection.test.tsx` - `pnpm run typecheck:build-gaps` - `git diff --check` - GitHub checks pass on head `2719f31e3`: build, typecheck/release registry, general tests, serialized server suites, e2e, canary, verify, policy/review, Socket, and Snyk. - Greptile Review passes with Confidence Score 5/5 and zero unresolved Greptile review threads. - No design screenshots/images were added because the task explicitly says not to add them unless they are specifically part of the work. ## Risks - Medium risk: this touches shared trust-policy contracts, server authorization paths, heartbeat context generation, migration metadata, and UI preset controls. - Low-trust containment is intentionally deny-by-default; legitimate future review workflows may need explicit allowlisted exceptions. - Plugin/runtime/security surfaces are broad, so regression tests cover the current known routes but future integrations must route through the same containment layer. - The PR is ready for review; GitHub checks are green and Greptile is 5/5. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex, GPT-5 coding agent, tool-enabled shell and GitHub CLI workflow. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] UI changes are covered by focused tests; no screenshots were added per task instruction not to add design images unless specifically required - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
381 lines
13 KiB
TypeScript
381 lines
13 KiB
TypeScript
import { Router, type Request } from "express";
|
|
import type { Db } from "@paperclipai/db";
|
|
import {
|
|
addApprovalCommentSchema,
|
|
createApprovalSchema,
|
|
requestApprovalRevisionSchema,
|
|
resolveApprovalSchema,
|
|
resubmitApprovalSchema,
|
|
} from "@paperclipai/shared";
|
|
import { validate } from "../middleware/validate.js";
|
|
import { logger } from "../middleware/logger.js";
|
|
import {
|
|
approvalService,
|
|
accessService,
|
|
heartbeatService,
|
|
issueApprovalService,
|
|
logActivity,
|
|
secretService,
|
|
} from "../services/index.js";
|
|
import { assertBoard, assertCompanyAccess, getActorInfo } from "./authz.js";
|
|
import { redactEventPayload } from "../redaction.js";
|
|
import type { PluginWorkerManager } from "../services/plugin-worker-manager.js";
|
|
|
|
function redactApprovalPayload<T extends { payload: Record<string, unknown> }>(approval: T): T {
|
|
return {
|
|
...approval,
|
|
payload: redactEventPayload(approval.payload) ?? {},
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
export function approvalRoutes(
|
|
db: Db,
|
|
options: { pluginWorkerManager?: PluginWorkerManager } = {},
|
|
) {
|
|
const router = Router();
|
|
const svc = approvalService(db);
|
|
const access = accessService(db);
|
|
const heartbeat = heartbeatService(db, {
|
|
pluginWorkerManager: options.pluginWorkerManager,
|
|
});
|
|
const issueApprovalsSvc = issueApprovalService(db);
|
|
const secretsSvc = secretService(db);
|
|
const strictSecretsMode = process.env.PAPERCLIP_SECRETS_STRICT_MODE === "true";
|
|
|
|
async function requireApprovalAccess(req: Request, id: string) {
|
|
const approval = await svc.getById(id);
|
|
if (!approval) {
|
|
return null;
|
|
}
|
|
assertCompanyAccess(req, approval.companyId);
|
|
return approval;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function assertApprovalAccessAllowed(req: Request, res: any, companyId: string) {
|
|
const decision = await access.decide({
|
|
actor: req.actor,
|
|
action: "company_scope:read",
|
|
resource: { type: "company", companyId },
|
|
});
|
|
if (decision.allowed) return true;
|
|
res.status(403).json({ error: "Approvals are outside this actor's authorization boundary" });
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
router.get("/companies/:companyId/approvals", async (req, res) => {
|
|
const companyId = req.params.companyId as string;
|
|
assertCompanyAccess(req, companyId);
|
|
if (!(await assertApprovalAccessAllowed(req, res, companyId))) return;
|
|
const status = req.query.status as string | undefined;
|
|
const result = await svc.list(companyId, status);
|
|
res.json(result.map((approval) => redactApprovalPayload(approval)));
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
router.get("/approvals/:id", async (req, res) => {
|
|
const id = req.params.id as string;
|
|
const approval = await svc.getById(id);
|
|
if (!approval) {
|
|
res.status(404).json({ error: "Approval not found" });
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
assertCompanyAccess(req, approval.companyId);
|
|
if (!(await assertApprovalAccessAllowed(req, res, approval.companyId))) return;
|
|
res.json(redactApprovalPayload(approval));
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
router.post("/companies/:companyId/approvals", validate(createApprovalSchema), async (req, res) => {
|
|
const companyId = req.params.companyId as string;
|
|
assertCompanyAccess(req, companyId);
|
|
if (!(await assertApprovalAccessAllowed(req, res, companyId))) return;
|
|
const rawIssueIds = req.body.issueIds;
|
|
const issueIds = Array.isArray(rawIssueIds)
|
|
? rawIssueIds.filter((value: unknown): value is string => typeof value === "string")
|
|
: [];
|
|
const uniqueIssueIds = Array.from(new Set(issueIds));
|
|
const { issueIds: _issueIds, ...approvalInput } = req.body;
|
|
const normalizedPayload =
|
|
approvalInput.type === "hire_agent"
|
|
? await secretsSvc.normalizeHireApprovalPayloadForPersistence(
|
|
companyId,
|
|
approvalInput.payload,
|
|
{ strictMode: strictSecretsMode },
|
|
)
|
|
: approvalInput.payload;
|
|
|
|
const actor = getActorInfo(req);
|
|
const approval = await svc.create(companyId, {
|
|
...approvalInput,
|
|
payload: normalizedPayload,
|
|
requestedByUserId: actor.actorType === "user" ? actor.actorId : null,
|
|
requestedByAgentId:
|
|
approvalInput.requestedByAgentId ?? (actor.actorType === "agent" ? actor.actorId : null),
|
|
status: "pending",
|
|
decisionNote: null,
|
|
decidedByUserId: null,
|
|
decidedAt: null,
|
|
updatedAt: new Date(),
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
if (uniqueIssueIds.length > 0) {
|
|
await issueApprovalsSvc.linkManyForApproval(approval.id, uniqueIssueIds, {
|
|
agentId: actor.agentId,
|
|
userId: actor.actorType === "user" ? actor.actorId : null,
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
await logActivity(db, {
|
|
companyId,
|
|
actorType: actor.actorType,
|
|
actorId: actor.actorId,
|
|
agentId: actor.agentId,
|
|
action: "approval.created",
|
|
entityType: "approval",
|
|
entityId: approval.id,
|
|
details: { type: approval.type, issueIds: uniqueIssueIds },
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
res.status(201).json(redactApprovalPayload(approval));
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
router.get("/approvals/:id/issues", async (req, res) => {
|
|
const id = req.params.id as string;
|
|
const approval = await svc.getById(id);
|
|
if (!approval) {
|
|
res.status(404).json({ error: "Approval not found" });
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
assertCompanyAccess(req, approval.companyId);
|
|
if (!(await assertApprovalAccessAllowed(req, res, approval.companyId))) return;
|
|
const issues = await issueApprovalsSvc.listIssuesForApproval(id);
|
|
res.json(issues);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
router.post("/approvals/:id/approve", validate(resolveApprovalSchema), async (req, res) => {
|
|
assertBoard(req);
|
|
const id = req.params.id as string;
|
|
if (!(await requireApprovalAccess(req, id))) {
|
|
res.status(404).json({ error: "Approval not found" });
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
const decidedByUserId = req.actor.userId ?? "board";
|
|
const { approval, applied } = await svc.approve(id, decidedByUserId, req.body.decisionNote);
|
|
|
|
if (applied) {
|
|
const linkedIssues = await issueApprovalsSvc.listIssuesForApproval(approval.id);
|
|
const linkedIssueIds = linkedIssues.map((issue) => issue.id);
|
|
const primaryIssueId = linkedIssueIds[0] ?? null;
|
|
|
|
await logActivity(db, {
|
|
companyId: approval.companyId,
|
|
actorType: "user",
|
|
actorId: req.actor.userId ?? "board",
|
|
action: "approval.approved",
|
|
entityType: "approval",
|
|
entityId: approval.id,
|
|
details: {
|
|
type: approval.type,
|
|
requestedByAgentId: approval.requestedByAgentId,
|
|
linkedIssueIds,
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
if (approval.requestedByAgentId) {
|
|
try {
|
|
const wakeRun = await heartbeat.wakeup(approval.requestedByAgentId, {
|
|
source: "automation",
|
|
triggerDetail: "system",
|
|
reason: "approval_approved",
|
|
payload: {
|
|
approvalId: approval.id,
|
|
approvalStatus: approval.status,
|
|
issueId: primaryIssueId,
|
|
issueIds: linkedIssueIds,
|
|
},
|
|
requestedByActorType: "user",
|
|
requestedByActorId: req.actor.userId ?? "board",
|
|
contextSnapshot: {
|
|
source: "approval.approved",
|
|
approvalId: approval.id,
|
|
approvalStatus: approval.status,
|
|
issueId: primaryIssueId,
|
|
issueIds: linkedIssueIds,
|
|
taskId: primaryIssueId,
|
|
wakeReason: "approval_approved",
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
await logActivity(db, {
|
|
companyId: approval.companyId,
|
|
actorType: "user",
|
|
actorId: req.actor.userId ?? "board",
|
|
action: "approval.requester_wakeup_queued",
|
|
entityType: "approval",
|
|
entityId: approval.id,
|
|
details: {
|
|
requesterAgentId: approval.requestedByAgentId,
|
|
wakeRunId: wakeRun?.id ?? null,
|
|
linkedIssueIds,
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
} catch (err) {
|
|
logger.warn(
|
|
{
|
|
err,
|
|
approvalId: approval.id,
|
|
requestedByAgentId: approval.requestedByAgentId,
|
|
},
|
|
"failed to queue requester wakeup after approval",
|
|
);
|
|
await logActivity(db, {
|
|
companyId: approval.companyId,
|
|
actorType: "user",
|
|
actorId: req.actor.userId ?? "board",
|
|
action: "approval.requester_wakeup_failed",
|
|
entityType: "approval",
|
|
entityId: approval.id,
|
|
details: {
|
|
requesterAgentId: approval.requestedByAgentId,
|
|
linkedIssueIds,
|
|
error: err instanceof Error ? err.message : String(err),
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
res.json(redactApprovalPayload(approval));
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
router.post("/approvals/:id/reject", validate(resolveApprovalSchema), async (req, res) => {
|
|
assertBoard(req);
|
|
const id = req.params.id as string;
|
|
if (!(await requireApprovalAccess(req, id))) {
|
|
res.status(404).json({ error: "Approval not found" });
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
const decidedByUserId = req.actor.userId ?? "board";
|
|
const { approval, applied } = await svc.reject(id, decidedByUserId, req.body.decisionNote);
|
|
|
|
if (applied) {
|
|
await logActivity(db, {
|
|
companyId: approval.companyId,
|
|
actorType: "user",
|
|
actorId: req.actor.userId ?? "board",
|
|
action: "approval.rejected",
|
|
entityType: "approval",
|
|
entityId: approval.id,
|
|
details: { type: approval.type },
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
res.json(redactApprovalPayload(approval));
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
router.post(
|
|
"/approvals/:id/request-revision",
|
|
validate(requestApprovalRevisionSchema),
|
|
async (req, res) => {
|
|
assertBoard(req);
|
|
const id = req.params.id as string;
|
|
if (!(await requireApprovalAccess(req, id))) {
|
|
res.status(404).json({ error: "Approval not found" });
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
const decidedByUserId = req.actor.userId ?? "board";
|
|
const approval = await svc.requestRevision(id, decidedByUserId, req.body.decisionNote);
|
|
|
|
await logActivity(db, {
|
|
companyId: approval.companyId,
|
|
actorType: "user",
|
|
actorId: req.actor.userId ?? "board",
|
|
action: "approval.revision_requested",
|
|
entityType: "approval",
|
|
entityId: approval.id,
|
|
details: { type: approval.type },
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
res.json(redactApprovalPayload(approval));
|
|
},
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
router.post("/approvals/:id/resubmit", validate(resubmitApprovalSchema), async (req, res) => {
|
|
const id = req.params.id as string;
|
|
const existing = await svc.getById(id);
|
|
if (!existing) {
|
|
res.status(404).json({ error: "Approval not found" });
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
assertCompanyAccess(req, existing.companyId);
|
|
|
|
if (req.actor.type === "agent" && req.actor.agentId !== existing.requestedByAgentId) {
|
|
res.status(403).json({ error: "Only requesting agent can resubmit this approval" });
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const normalizedPayload = req.body.payload
|
|
? existing.type === "hire_agent"
|
|
? await secretsSvc.normalizeHireApprovalPayloadForPersistence(
|
|
existing.companyId,
|
|
req.body.payload,
|
|
{ strictMode: strictSecretsMode },
|
|
)
|
|
: req.body.payload
|
|
: undefined;
|
|
const approval = await svc.resubmit(id, normalizedPayload);
|
|
const actor = getActorInfo(req);
|
|
await logActivity(db, {
|
|
companyId: approval.companyId,
|
|
actorType: actor.actorType,
|
|
actorId: actor.actorId,
|
|
agentId: actor.agentId,
|
|
action: "approval.resubmitted",
|
|
entityType: "approval",
|
|
entityId: approval.id,
|
|
details: { type: approval.type },
|
|
});
|
|
res.json(redactApprovalPayload(approval));
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
router.get("/approvals/:id/comments", async (req, res) => {
|
|
const id = req.params.id as string;
|
|
const approval = await svc.getById(id);
|
|
if (!approval) {
|
|
res.status(404).json({ error: "Approval not found" });
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
assertCompanyAccess(req, approval.companyId);
|
|
const comments = await svc.listComments(id);
|
|
res.json(comments);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
router.post("/approvals/:id/comments", validate(addApprovalCommentSchema), async (req, res) => {
|
|
const id = req.params.id as string;
|
|
const approval = await svc.getById(id);
|
|
if (!approval) {
|
|
res.status(404).json({ error: "Approval not found" });
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
assertCompanyAccess(req, approval.companyId);
|
|
const actor = getActorInfo(req);
|
|
const comment = await svc.addComment(id, req.body.body, {
|
|
agentId: actor.agentId ?? undefined,
|
|
userId: actor.actorType === "user" ? actor.actorId : undefined,
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
await logActivity(db, {
|
|
companyId: approval.companyId,
|
|
actorType: actor.actorType,
|
|
actorId: actor.actorId,
|
|
agentId: actor.agentId,
|
|
action: "approval.comment_added",
|
|
entityType: "approval",
|
|
entityId: approval.id,
|
|
details: { commentId: comment.id },
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
res.status(201).json(comment);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
return router;
|
|
}
|