70b1a9109d
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is a control plane for AI-agent companies, with the CLI acting as a scriptable operator and agent interface to that control plane. > - The REST API surface has grown across companies, agents, issues, routines, plugins, auth, workspaces, secrets, and operational inspection commands. > - The CLI had drifted from that API surface: some commands were missing, some command shapes differed from docs/reference material, and several edge cases only failed during end-to-end local-source testing. > - The local development runbook requires these tests to be disposable and isolated from a real `~/.paperclip`, `~/.codex`, or `~/.claude` installation. > - This pull request adds broad CLI/API parity coverage, fixes the actionable bugs found during that pass, and records the reproducible test log under `doc/logs`. > - The benefit is a more complete, scriptable CLI surface with regression coverage for the command families exercised by the parity run. ## What Changed - Added or expanded CLI command coverage for access/auth, companies, agents, projects, goals, issues and subresources, routines, plugins, workspaces, activity/run/cost/dashboard inspection, assets, skills, secrets, tokens, prompt/wake flows, and local setup helpers. - Fixed CLI/API parity bugs found during the run, including context profile patching, issue interaction optional payloads, malformed tree-hold errors, environment duplicate handling, configure invalid-section exit codes, worktree pnpm invocation, token agent ID resolution, plugin tool worker lookup, and routine webhook secret cleanup. - Added missing CLI wrappers and route coverage for health/access, invite resolution URL forwarding, join status normalization, secret lifecycle commands, LLM docs routes, available-skill isolation, positive board-claim coverage, and interactive `connect` prompt-flow tests. - Added a schema-backed `/api/openapi.json` route sufficient for CLI parity and `paperclipai openapi --json` smoke coverage. - Added `doc/logs/2026-05-24-cli-api-parity-e2e-log.md` with the detailed living test/bug log and renamed the log directory from `doc/bugs` to `doc/logs`. - Added `doc/plans/2026-05-23-cli-api-parity.md` and the OpenAPI parity reference used during the pass. OpenAPI note: this PR intentionally does not try to subsume `feature/openapi-spec`. The OpenAPI implementation here is schema-backed and better than the earlier route-inventory stub, but `feature/openapi-spec` is the fuller/better OpenAPI branch because it includes exact mounted-route coverage tests and additional current route coverage. That branch should stay as its own PR and can supersede this OpenAPI route implementation. ## Verification Targeted automated checks run: - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/openapi-routes.test.ts` - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/board-claim.test.ts` - `pnpm exec vitest run cli/src/__tests__/connect.test.ts` - `pnpm exec vitest run cli/src/__tests__/agent-lifecycle.test.ts` - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/plugin-database.test.ts` - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/routines-service.test.ts` - `pnpm --dir cli typecheck` - `pnpm --dir server typecheck` Manual/local E2E verification: - Ran the full disposable local-source CLI/API parity pass with isolated `PAPERCLIP_HOME`, `PAPERCLIP_CONFIG`, `PAPERCLIP_CONTEXT`, `PAPERCLIP_AUTH_STORE`, `CODEX_HOME`, and `CLAUDE_HOME` under `tmp/cli-api-parity`. - Verified `DATABASE_URL` and `DATABASE_MIGRATION_URL` stayed unset for the scratch server. - Verified live health and schema-backed OpenAPI responses on non-default port `3197`. - Revoked created board/agent tokens and cleaned up temporary plugins, secrets, non-default environments, and project workspaces. - See `doc/logs/2026-05-24-cli-api-parity-e2e-log.md` for the full command-by-command reproduction log. Not run: - Full `pnpm test`, `pnpm test:run`, or `pnpm build` were not run after the entire branch because the branch is broad and the parity pass used focused test/typecheck verification plus live isolated CLI reruns. ## Risks - This is a broad PR and touches many CLI command modules, so review surface is high. The changes are grouped around one theme, but a split may be easier if maintainers prefer narrower PRs. - The OpenAPI route in this PR is not the final/best OpenAPI implementation. `feature/openapi-spec` has stronger exact-route coverage and should remain the source for the dedicated OpenAPI PR. - The living log is intentionally detailed and large. It is useful for reproducibility but adds documentation weight. - No UI changes are intended; screenshots are not applicable. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex, GPT-5-based coding agent in Codex desktop. Exact served model/context-window identifier was not exposed in the local app. Work used shell/Git/GitHub CLI tooling, local source inspection, targeted test execution, and live isolated Paperclip CLI/API smoke testing. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Devin Foley <devin@devinfoley.com>
178 lines
5.3 KiB
TypeScript
178 lines
5.3 KiB
TypeScript
import os from "node:os";
|
|
import path from "node:path";
|
|
import { mkdtemp, readFile } from "node:fs/promises";
|
|
import { Command } from "commander";
|
|
import { describe, expect, it } from "vitest";
|
|
import type { FeedbackTrace } from "@paperclipai/shared";
|
|
import { readZipArchive } from "../commands/client/zip.js";
|
|
import {
|
|
buildFeedbackTraceQuery,
|
|
registerFeedbackCommands,
|
|
renderFeedbackReport,
|
|
summarizeFeedbackTraces,
|
|
writeFeedbackExportBundle,
|
|
} from "../commands/client/feedback.js";
|
|
|
|
function makeTrace(overrides: Partial<FeedbackTrace> = {}): FeedbackTrace {
|
|
return {
|
|
id: "trace-12345678",
|
|
companyId: "company-123",
|
|
feedbackVoteId: "vote-12345678",
|
|
issueId: "issue-123",
|
|
projectId: "project-123",
|
|
issueIdentifier: "PAP-123",
|
|
issueTitle: "Fix the feedback command",
|
|
authorUserId: "user-123",
|
|
targetType: "issue_comment",
|
|
targetId: "comment-123",
|
|
vote: "down",
|
|
status: "pending",
|
|
destination: "paperclip_labs_feedback_v1",
|
|
exportId: null,
|
|
consentVersion: "feedback-data-sharing-v1",
|
|
schemaVersion: "1",
|
|
bundleVersion: "1",
|
|
payloadVersion: "1",
|
|
payloadDigest: null,
|
|
payloadSnapshot: {
|
|
vote: {
|
|
value: "down",
|
|
reason: "Needed more detail",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
targetSummary: {
|
|
label: "Comment",
|
|
excerpt: "The first answer was too vague.",
|
|
authorAgentId: "agent-123",
|
|
authorUserId: null,
|
|
createdAt: new Date("2026-03-31T12:00:00.000Z"),
|
|
documentKey: null,
|
|
documentTitle: null,
|
|
revisionNumber: null,
|
|
},
|
|
redactionSummary: null,
|
|
attemptCount: 0,
|
|
lastAttemptedAt: null,
|
|
exportedAt: null,
|
|
failureReason: null,
|
|
createdAt: new Date("2026-03-31T12:01:00.000Z"),
|
|
updatedAt: new Date("2026-03-31T12:02:00.000Z"),
|
|
...overrides,
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
describe("registerFeedbackCommands", () => {
|
|
it("registers the top-level feedback commands", () => {
|
|
const program = new Command();
|
|
|
|
expect(() => registerFeedbackCommands(program)).not.toThrow();
|
|
|
|
const feedback = program.commands.find((command) => command.name() === "feedback");
|
|
expect(feedback).toBeDefined();
|
|
expect(feedback?.commands.map((command) => command.name())).toEqual(["report", "export", "trace", "bundle"]);
|
|
expect(feedback?.commands[0]?.options.filter((option) => option.long === "--company-id")).toHaveLength(1);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe("buildFeedbackTraceQuery", () => {
|
|
it("encodes all supported filters", () => {
|
|
expect(
|
|
buildFeedbackTraceQuery({
|
|
targetType: "issue_comment",
|
|
vote: "down",
|
|
status: "pending",
|
|
projectId: "project-123",
|
|
issueId: "issue-123",
|
|
from: "2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z",
|
|
to: "2026-03-31T23:59:59.999Z",
|
|
sharedOnly: true,
|
|
}),
|
|
).toBe(
|
|
"?targetType=issue_comment&vote=down&status=pending&projectId=project-123&issueId=issue-123&from=2026-03-31T00%3A00%3A00.000Z&to=2026-03-31T23%3A59%3A59.999Z&sharedOnly=true&includePayload=true",
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe("renderFeedbackReport", () => {
|
|
it("includes summary counts and the optional reason", () => {
|
|
const traces = [
|
|
makeTrace(),
|
|
makeTrace({
|
|
id: "trace-87654321",
|
|
feedbackVoteId: "vote-87654321",
|
|
vote: "up",
|
|
status: "local_only",
|
|
payloadSnapshot: {
|
|
vote: {
|
|
value: "up",
|
|
reason: null,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
}),
|
|
];
|
|
|
|
const report = renderFeedbackReport({
|
|
apiBase: "http://127.0.0.1:3100",
|
|
companyId: "company-123",
|
|
traces,
|
|
summary: summarizeFeedbackTraces(traces),
|
|
includePayloads: false,
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(report).toContain("Paperclip Feedback Report");
|
|
expect(report).toContain("thumbs up");
|
|
expect(report).toContain("thumbs down");
|
|
expect(report).toContain("Needed more detail");
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe("writeFeedbackExportBundle", () => {
|
|
it("writes votes, traces, a manifest, and a zip archive", async () => {
|
|
const tempDir = await mkdtemp(path.join(os.tmpdir(), "paperclip-feedback-export-"));
|
|
const outputDir = path.join(tempDir, "feedback-export");
|
|
const traces = [
|
|
makeTrace(),
|
|
makeTrace({
|
|
id: "trace-abcdef12",
|
|
feedbackVoteId: "vote-abcdef12",
|
|
issueIdentifier: "PAP-124",
|
|
issueId: "issue-124",
|
|
vote: "up",
|
|
status: "local_only",
|
|
payloadSnapshot: {
|
|
vote: {
|
|
value: "up",
|
|
reason: null,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
}),
|
|
];
|
|
|
|
const exported = await writeFeedbackExportBundle({
|
|
apiBase: "http://127.0.0.1:3100",
|
|
companyId: "company-123",
|
|
traces,
|
|
outputDir,
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(exported.manifest.summary.total).toBe(2);
|
|
expect(exported.manifest.summary.withReason).toBe(1);
|
|
|
|
const manifest = JSON.parse(await readFile(path.join(outputDir, "index.json"), "utf8")) as {
|
|
files: { votes: string[]; traces: string[]; zip: string };
|
|
};
|
|
expect(manifest.files.votes).toHaveLength(2);
|
|
expect(manifest.files.traces).toHaveLength(2);
|
|
|
|
const archive = await readFile(exported.zipPath);
|
|
const zip = await readZipArchive(archive);
|
|
expect(Object.keys(zip.files)).toEqual(
|
|
expect.arrayContaining([
|
|
"index.json",
|
|
`votes/${manifest.files.votes[0]}`,
|
|
`traces/${manifest.files.traces[0]}`,
|
|
]),
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|