Files
paperclip/server/src/__tests__/agent-test-environment-routes.test.ts
T
Dotta 38c185fb8b [codex] Add agent permissions and controls plan (#6386)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies by keeping
task ownership, approvals, and operator control inside one control
plane.
> - Agent permissions and plugin-hosted company settings sit on the
boundary between autonomy and governance.
> - V1 needs scoped task assignment rules, plugin extension points, and
clearer company access surfaces without weakening company boundaries.
> - The branch builds the core authorization service, plugin SDK/host
APIs, and UI simplifications needed to support those controls.
> - Paperclip EE plugin surfaces were intentionally moved out of this
core PR per review direction, so this PR now carries only the public
core/plugin infrastructure work.
> - The latest updates preserve the PAP-9937 branch changes that belong
in this PR, remove the `design/` artifacts, and exclude the experimental
`plugin-briefs` package.
> - Greptile feedback was applied through the authorization/audit paths
and the final cleanup commit was re-reviewed at 5/5 with no unresolved
Greptile threads.
> - The benefit is safer assignment control with extension hooks for
richer permission products while preserving simple defaults for normal
operators.

## What Changed

- Added scoped task-assignment authorization decisions and routed
issue/agent assignment mutations through the authorization service.
- Added plugin SDK and host APIs for company settings slots,
authorization policy/grant management, assignment previews, and bridge
invocation scope propagation.
- Simplified core company access UI and moved advanced controls behind
plugin-provided settings surfaces.
- Added retry-now affordances for blocked issue next-step notices.
- Added protected-assignment enforcement for persisted
agent/project/issue policies, including explicit-grant fallback
behavior.
- Added incremental principal-access compatibility backfill for active
agent memberships and role-default human permission grants.
- Added the Markdown code block wrap action fix from the latest branch
changes.
- Removed `design/` artifacts from the PR and removed
`packages/plugins/plugin-briefs` from the final diff.
- Addressed Greptile feedback for plugin actor sanitization, legacy
membership handling, audit pagination, unknown grant-scope metadata, and
startup test mocks.

## Verification

- `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/access-service.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/company-portability.test.ts` -> 2 files passed, 54
tests passed.
- `pnpm exec vitest run
server/src/__tests__/server-startup-feedback-export.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/access-service.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/company-portability.test.ts` -> 3 files passed, 62
tests passed.
- `pnpm exec vitest run
server/src/__tests__/authorization-service.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/plugin-access-authorization-host-services.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/server-startup-feedback-export.test.ts` -> 3 files
passed, 28 tests passed.
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck` -> passed.
- `git diff --check` -> passed.
- `node ./scripts/check-docker-deps-stage.mjs` -> passed.
- `CI=true pnpm install --frozen-lockfile --ignore-scripts` -> passed
with no lockfile update.
- `pnpm exec vitest run
ui/src/components/MarkdownBody.interaction.test.tsx` -> 1 test passed.
- `git ls-files design packages/plugins/plugin-briefs | wc -l` -> 0.
- GitHub CI on `40cd83b53` -> all checks passed, merge state `CLEAN`.
- Greptile on `40cd83b53` -> 5/5, 102 files reviewed, 0
comments/annotations added, 0 unresolved review threads.
- Confirmed the PR diff contains no `design/`,
`packages/plugins/plugin-briefs`, `pnpm-lock.yaml`, or
`.github/workflows` changes.

## Risks

- Medium: task assignment authorization paths are behaviorally stricter
for protected/private policy data, so existing plugin-authored policies
may block assignment until explicit grants or approval flows are
configured.
- Medium: plugin-host authorization APIs expand the surface area
available to trusted plugins and need careful review for company
scoping.
- Low: startup now performs a principal-access compatibility backfill,
but the migration and runtime backfill use conflict-tolerant inserts.

> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.

## Model Used

- OpenAI Codex, GPT-5 coding agent, tool-enabled workflow with shell,
git, and GitHub CLI access.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-05-22 08:12:52 -05:00

312 lines
9.8 KiB
TypeScript

import express from "express";
import request from "supertest";
import { afterEach, beforeEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from "vitest";
import type { ServerAdapterModule } from "../adapters/index.js";
const mockAgentService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
getById: vi.fn(),
getChainOfCommand: vi.fn(async () => []),
}));
const mockAccessService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
canUser: vi.fn(),
decide: vi.fn(),
hasPermission: vi.fn(),
getMembership: vi.fn(async () => null),
listPrincipalGrants: vi.fn(async () => []),
}));
const mockSecretService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
normalizeAdapterConfigForPersistence: vi.fn(async (_companyId: string, config: Record<string, unknown>) => config),
resolveAdapterConfigForRuntime: vi.fn(async (_companyId: string, config: Record<string, unknown>) => ({ config })),
}));
const mockEnvironmentService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
getById: vi.fn(),
releaseLease: vi.fn(),
}));
const mockReleaseRunLease = vi.hoisted(() => vi.fn(async () => undefined));
const mockEnvironmentRuntime = vi.hoisted(() => ({
acquireRunLease: vi.fn(),
realizeWorkspace: vi.fn(),
getDriver: vi.fn(() => ({
releaseRunLease: mockReleaseRunLease,
})),
}));
const mockResolveEnvironmentExecutionTarget = vi.hoisted(() => vi.fn());
const mockInstanceSettingsService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
getGeneral: vi.fn(async () => ({ censorUsernameInLogs: false })),
}));
vi.mock("../services/index.js", () => ({
agentService: () => mockAgentService,
agentInstructionsService: () => ({}),
accessService: () => mockAccessService,
approvalService: () => ({}),
companySkillService: () => ({
listRuntimeSkillEntries: vi.fn(async () => []),
resolveRequestedSkillKeys: vi.fn(async () => []),
}),
budgetService: () => ({}),
heartbeatService: () => ({
wakeup: vi.fn(),
cancelActiveForAgent: vi.fn(),
}),
ISSUE_LIST_DEFAULT_LIMIT: 50,
issueApprovalService: () => ({}),
issueService: () => ({}),
logActivity: vi.fn(),
syncInstructionsBundleConfigFromFilePath: vi.fn((_agent, config) => config),
workspaceOperationService: () => ({}),
}));
vi.mock("../services/environments.js", () => ({
environmentService: () => mockEnvironmentService,
}));
vi.mock("../services/secrets.js", () => ({
secretService: () => mockSecretService,
}));
vi.mock("../services/environment-runtime.js", () => ({
environmentRuntimeService: () => mockEnvironmentRuntime,
}));
vi.mock("../services/environment-execution-target.js", () => ({
resolveEnvironmentExecutionTarget: mockResolveEnvironmentExecutionTarget,
}));
vi.mock("../services/instance-settings.js", () => ({
instanceSettingsService: () => mockInstanceSettingsService,
}));
const testEnvironmentSpy = vi.fn();
const externalAdapter: ServerAdapterModule = {
type: "external_test",
execute: async () => ({ exitCode: 0, signal: null, timedOut: false }),
testEnvironment: testEnvironmentSpy,
};
async function createApp() {
const [{ agentRoutes }, { errorHandler }] = await Promise.all([
vi.importActual<typeof import("../routes/agents.js")>("../routes/agents.js"),
vi.importActual<typeof import("../middleware/index.js")>("../middleware/index.js"),
]);
const app = express();
app.use(express.json());
app.use((req, _res, next) => {
(req as any).actor = {
type: "board",
userId: "local-board",
companyIds: ["company-1"],
source: "local_implicit",
isInstanceAdmin: false,
};
next();
});
app.use("/api", agentRoutes({} as any));
app.use(errorHandler);
return app;
}
async function unregisterTestAdapter(type: string) {
const { unregisterServerAdapter } = await import("../adapters/index.js");
unregisterServerAdapter(type);
}
describe("agent test-environment route", () => {
beforeEach(async () => {
vi.resetModules();
vi.clearAllMocks();
mockAccessService.decide.mockResolvedValue({
allowed: true,
reason: "allow_explicit_grant",
explanation: "Allowed by test grant",
});
mockEnvironmentService.getById.mockResolvedValue({
id: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
companyId: "company-1",
name: "Sandbox QA",
driver: "sandbox",
config: { provider: "fake-plugin" },
});
mockEnvironmentRuntime.acquireRunLease.mockResolvedValue({
lease: {
id: "lease-1",
metadata: { remoteCwd: "/home/user/paperclip-workspace" },
},
leaseContext: {
executionWorkspaceId: null,
executionWorkspaceMode: null,
},
});
mockEnvironmentRuntime.realizeWorkspace.mockResolvedValue({
cwd: "/home/user/paperclip-workspace",
});
mockResolveEnvironmentExecutionTarget.mockResolvedValue(null);
testEnvironmentSpy.mockResolvedValue({
adapterType: "external_test",
status: "pass",
checks: [
{
code: "host_probe_ran",
level: "info",
message: "host probe should not run",
},
],
testedAt: new Date(0).toISOString(),
});
await unregisterTestAdapter("external_test");
const { registerServerAdapter } = await import("../adapters/index.js");
registerServerAdapter(externalAdapter);
});
afterEach(async () => {
await unregisterTestAdapter("external_test");
});
it("does not fall back to a host probe when a requested environment cannot produce an execution target", async () => {
const app = await createApp();
const res = await request(app)
.post("/api/companies/company-1/adapters/external_test/test-environment")
.send({
adapterConfig: {},
environmentId: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
});
expect(res.status, JSON.stringify(res.body)).toBe(200);
expect(testEnvironmentSpy).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
expect(res.body).toMatchObject({
adapterType: "external_test",
status: "warn",
checks: [
{
code: "environment_target_unsupported",
level: "warn",
message: 'Adapter "external_test" is not allowed in "Sandbox QA" environments.',
},
],
});
expect(mockReleaseRunLease).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
environment: expect.objectContaining({
id: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
name: "Sandbox QA",
driver: "sandbox",
}),
lease: expect.objectContaining({
id: "lease-1",
}),
status: "failed",
});
});
it("returns a diagnostic result instead of probing the host when the requested environment is missing", async () => {
mockEnvironmentService.getById.mockResolvedValueOnce(null);
const app = await createApp();
const res = await request(app)
.post("/api/companies/company-1/adapters/external_test/test-environment")
.send({
adapterConfig: {},
environmentId: "22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222",
});
expect(res.status, JSON.stringify(res.body)).toBe(200);
expect(testEnvironmentSpy).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
expect(mockEnvironmentRuntime.acquireRunLease).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
expect(res.body).toMatchObject({
adapterType: "external_test",
status: "warn",
checks: [
{
code: "environment_not_found",
level: "warn",
message: "Selected environment was not found. The test did not run.",
},
],
});
});
it("runs the adapter probe against the resolved sandbox target on the happy path and releases the lease on success", async () => {
mockResolveEnvironmentExecutionTarget.mockResolvedValueOnce({
kind: "remote",
transport: "sandbox",
remoteCwd: "/home/user/paperclip-workspace",
providerKey: "fake-plugin",
runner: { execute: vi.fn() },
});
testEnvironmentSpy.mockResolvedValueOnce({
adapterType: "external_test",
status: "pass",
checks: [
{
code: "external_test_hello_probe_passed",
level: "info",
message: "OK",
},
],
testedAt: new Date(0).toISOString(),
});
const app = await createApp();
const res = await request(app)
.post("/api/companies/company-1/adapters/external_test/test-environment")
.send({
adapterConfig: {},
environmentId: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
});
expect(res.status, JSON.stringify(res.body)).toBe(200);
expect(testEnvironmentSpy).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
expect(testEnvironmentSpy.mock.calls[0]?.[0]).toMatchObject({
executionTarget: expect.objectContaining({
kind: "remote",
transport: "sandbox",
}),
environmentName: "Sandbox QA",
});
expect(res.body).toMatchObject({ adapterType: "external_test", status: "pass" });
expect(mockReleaseRunLease).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
environment: expect.objectContaining({ id: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111" }),
lease: expect.objectContaining({ id: "lease-1" }),
status: "released",
});
});
it("releases the lease as failed and returns a diagnostic when realizeWorkspace throws", async () => {
mockEnvironmentRuntime.realizeWorkspace.mockRejectedValueOnce(
new Error("workspace realization failed"),
);
const app = await createApp();
const res = await request(app)
.post("/api/companies/company-1/adapters/external_test/test-environment")
.send({
adapterConfig: {},
environmentId: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
});
expect(res.status, JSON.stringify(res.body)).toBe(200);
expect(testEnvironmentSpy).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
expect(res.body).toMatchObject({
adapterType: "external_test",
status: "fail",
checks: [
expect.objectContaining({
code: "environment_workspace_realize_failed",
level: "error",
}),
],
});
expect(mockReleaseRunLease).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
environment: expect.objectContaining({ id: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111" }),
lease: expect.objectContaining({ id: "lease-1" }),
status: "failed",
});
});
});