dbebf30c89
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is a control plane for AI-agent companies, so execution policy and trust boundaries are part of the product's safety contract. > - Low-trust review work needs narrower authority than normal same-company agents because hostile PRs, comments, attachments, and generated output can carry prompt-injection payloads. > - The current V1 shape gives trusted workers broad company context, which is useful for normal execution but too permissive for a reviewer assigned to hostile content. > - This branch adds a `low_trust_review` preset, source-trust tagging, route-level containment, and quarantine handling so low-trust output does not automatically flow into higher-trust wake context. > - The branch has been rebased onto current `origin/master`, and the low-trust migration was renumbered to `0097_low_trust_source_trust.sql` to avoid collisions with existing `0091` through `0096` migrations. > - Greptile feedback was addressed by tightening low-trust detection, preserving project-level trust policy checks, fixing issue-kind promotion lookup, removing duplicate post-lease isolation assertion, documenting fail-closed source-trust behavior, bounding ancestry checks, enforcing runtime issue context for CEOs, awaiting accepted-plan monitor authorization, and making low-trust issue source-trust tagging atomic. > - The benefit is a first production slice of deny-by-default review containment with regression coverage for the main control-plane pivot surfaces. Fixes #7531. ## What Changed - Added shared trust-policy types and validators, plus database/source-trust fields for issues, comments, documents, and work products. - Implemented server enforcement for low-trust issue scope, agent self-view redaction, secret/plugin/runtime denial paths, promotion checks, and quarantined continuation/wake context. - Added focused low-trust regression tests for resolver behavior, source trust, route authorization, heartbeat preflight ordering, runtime containment, and quarantine redaction. - Added board UI affordances for selecting/reviewing the low-trust preset and surfacing source-trust badges in relevant issue views. - Added `doc/LOW-TRUST-PRESETS.md`, updated `doc/SPEC-implementation.md`, and committed the low-trust review contract plan under `doc/plans/`. - Rebasing note: the original `0097_low_trust_source_trust.sql` migration was renamed to `0097_low_trust_source_trust.sql`; the SQL uses `ADD COLUMN IF NOT EXISTS` so users who already applied the old-numbered migration are not broken by the renumbered migration. ## Verification - Rebased branch onto current `origin/master` and force-pushed with lease to `origin/PAP-10211-low-trust-agent` at head `2719f31e3`. - Confirmed the PR diff does not include `pnpm-lock.yaml` or `.github/workflows` changes. - Resolved upstream UI/comment conflicts by preserving deleted-comment tombstone behavior and low-trust source-trust badges/metadata. - Renumbered the low-trust source-trust migration to `0097_low_trust_source_trust.sql`; the SQL uses `ADD COLUMN IF NOT EXISTS` so users who already applied an old-numbered copy are not broken. - `pnpm exec vitest run ui/src/lib/issue-chat-messages.test.ts server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-workspace-session.test.ts` - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/source-trust.test.ts server/src/__tests__/workspace-runtime-service-authz.test.ts ui/src/lib/trust-policy-ui.test.ts ui/src/components/TrustPresetSection.test.tsx` - `pnpm run typecheck:build-gaps` - `git diff --check` - GitHub checks pass on head `2719f31e3`: build, typecheck/release registry, general tests, serialized server suites, e2e, canary, verify, policy/review, Socket, and Snyk. - Greptile Review passes with Confidence Score 5/5 and zero unresolved Greptile review threads. - No design screenshots/images were added because the task explicitly says not to add them unless they are specifically part of the work. ## Risks - Medium risk: this touches shared trust-policy contracts, server authorization paths, heartbeat context generation, migration metadata, and UI preset controls. - Low-trust containment is intentionally deny-by-default; legitimate future review workflows may need explicit allowlisted exceptions. - Plugin/runtime/security surfaces are broad, so regression tests cover the current known routes but future integrations must route through the same containment layer. - The PR is ready for review; GitHub checks are green and Greptile is 5/5. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex, GPT-5 coding agent, tool-enabled shell and GitHub CLI workflow. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] UI changes are covered by focused tests; no screenshots were added per task instruction not to add design images unless specifically required - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
316 lines
10 KiB
TypeScript
316 lines
10 KiB
TypeScript
import express from "express";
|
|
import request from "supertest";
|
|
import { beforeEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from "vitest";
|
|
|
|
const mockIssueService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
|
addComment: vi.fn(),
|
|
assertCheckoutOwner: vi.fn(),
|
|
create: vi.fn(),
|
|
findMentionedAgents: vi.fn(),
|
|
getByIdentifier: vi.fn(),
|
|
getById: vi.fn(),
|
|
getRelationSummaries: vi.fn(),
|
|
getWakeableParentAfterChildCompletion: vi.fn(),
|
|
listWakeableBlockedDependents: vi.fn(),
|
|
update: vi.fn(),
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
const mockAccessService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
|
canUser: vi.fn(),
|
|
decide: vi.fn(),
|
|
hasPermission: vi.fn(),
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
const mockAgentService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
|
getById: vi.fn(),
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
const mockExecutionWorkspaceService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
|
getById: vi.fn(),
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
const mockFeedbackService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
|
listIssueVotesForUser: vi.fn(),
|
|
saveIssueVote: vi.fn(),
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
const mockHeartbeatService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
|
wakeup: vi.fn(),
|
|
reportRunActivity: vi.fn(),
|
|
getRun: vi.fn(),
|
|
getActiveRunForAgent: vi.fn(),
|
|
cancelRun: vi.fn(),
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
const mockInstanceSettingsService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
|
get: vi.fn(),
|
|
listCompanyIds: vi.fn(),
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
const mockLogActivity = vi.hoisted(() => vi.fn());
|
|
|
|
const mockRoutineService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
|
syncRunStatusForIssue: vi.fn(),
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
const mockDbSelectWhere = vi.hoisted(() => vi.fn(() => ({
|
|
then: (onFulfilled: (rows: unknown[]) => unknown, onRejected?: (reason: unknown) => unknown) =>
|
|
Promise.resolve([{ companyId: "company-1", agentId: "agent-1", contextSnapshot: null }]).then(
|
|
onFulfilled,
|
|
onRejected,
|
|
),
|
|
})));
|
|
const mockDbSelectFrom = vi.hoisted(() => vi.fn(() => ({ where: mockDbSelectWhere })));
|
|
const mockDbSelect = vi.hoisted(() => vi.fn(() => ({ from: mockDbSelectFrom })));
|
|
const mockDb = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
|
select: mockDbSelect,
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
function registerRouteMocks() {
|
|
vi.doMock("../services/access.js", () => ({
|
|
accessService: () => mockAccessService,
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
vi.doMock("../services/activity-log.js", () => ({
|
|
logActivity: mockLogActivity,
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
vi.doMock("../services/agents.js", () => ({
|
|
agentService: () => mockAgentService,
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
vi.doMock("../services/execution-workspaces.js", () => ({
|
|
executionWorkspaceService: () => mockExecutionWorkspaceService,
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
vi.doMock("../services/feedback.js", () => ({
|
|
feedbackService: () => mockFeedbackService,
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
vi.doMock("../services/heartbeat.js", () => ({
|
|
heartbeatService: () => mockHeartbeatService,
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
vi.doMock("../services/instance-settings.js", () => ({
|
|
instanceSettingsService: () => mockInstanceSettingsService,
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
vi.doMock("../services/issues.js", () => ({
|
|
issueService: () => mockIssueService,
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
vi.doMock("../services/routines.js", () => ({
|
|
routineService: () => mockRoutineService,
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
vi.doMock("../services/index.js", () => ({
|
|
companyService: () => ({
|
|
getById: vi.fn(async () => ({ id: "company-1", attachmentMaxBytes: 10 * 1024 * 1024 })),
|
|
}),
|
|
accessService: () => mockAccessService,
|
|
agentService: () => mockAgentService,
|
|
documentAnnotationService: () => ({ remapOpenThreadsForDocument: async () => [] }),
|
|
documentService: () => ({}),
|
|
executionWorkspaceService: () => mockExecutionWorkspaceService,
|
|
feedbackService: () => mockFeedbackService,
|
|
goalService: () => ({}),
|
|
heartbeatService: () => mockHeartbeatService,
|
|
instanceSettingsService: () => mockInstanceSettingsService,
|
|
issueApprovalService: () => ({}),
|
|
issueReferenceService: () => ({
|
|
deleteDocumentSource: async () => undefined,
|
|
diffIssueReferenceSummary: () => ({
|
|
addedReferencedIssues: [],
|
|
removedReferencedIssues: [],
|
|
currentReferencedIssues: [],
|
|
}),
|
|
emptySummary: () => ({ outbound: [], inbound: [] }),
|
|
listIssueReferenceSummary: async () => ({ outbound: [], inbound: [] }),
|
|
syncComment: async () => undefined,
|
|
syncDocument: async () => undefined,
|
|
syncIssue: async () => undefined,
|
|
}),
|
|
issueRecoveryActionService: () => ({
|
|
getActiveForIssue: vi.fn(async () => null),
|
|
listActiveForIssues: vi.fn(async () => new Map()),
|
|
}),
|
|
issueThreadInteractionService: () => ({
|
|
listForIssue: vi.fn(async () => []),
|
|
expireRequestConfirmationsSupersededByComment: vi.fn(async () => []),
|
|
expireStaleRequestConfirmationsForIssueDocument: vi.fn(async () => []),
|
|
}),
|
|
issueService: () => mockIssueService,
|
|
logActivity: mockLogActivity,
|
|
projectService: () => ({}),
|
|
routineService: () => mockRoutineService,
|
|
workProductService: () => ({}),
|
|
}));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function createApp(actor: Record<string, unknown>) {
|
|
const [{ errorHandler }, { issueRoutes }] = await Promise.all([
|
|
vi.importActual<typeof import("../middleware/index.js")>("../middleware/index.js"),
|
|
vi.importActual<typeof import("../routes/issues.js")>("../routes/issues.js"),
|
|
]);
|
|
const app = express();
|
|
app.use(express.json());
|
|
app.use((req, _res, next) => {
|
|
(req as any).actor = actor;
|
|
next();
|
|
});
|
|
app.use("/api", issueRoutes(mockDb as any, {} as any));
|
|
app.use(errorHandler);
|
|
return app;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function makeIssue(overrides: Record<string, unknown> = {}) {
|
|
return {
|
|
id: "issue-1",
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
status: "todo",
|
|
priority: "medium",
|
|
projectId: null,
|
|
goalId: null,
|
|
parentId: null,
|
|
assigneeAgentId: null,
|
|
assigneeUserId: null,
|
|
createdByUserId: "board-user",
|
|
identifier: "PAP-1000",
|
|
title: "Workspace authz",
|
|
executionPolicy: null,
|
|
executionState: null,
|
|
executionWorkspaceId: null,
|
|
hiddenAt: null,
|
|
...overrides,
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
describe("issue workspace command authorization", () => {
|
|
beforeEach(() => {
|
|
vi.resetModules();
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../services/access.js");
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../services/activity-log.js");
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../services/agents.js");
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../services/execution-workspaces.js");
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../services/feedback.js");
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../services/heartbeat.js");
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../services/index.js");
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../services/instance-settings.js");
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../services/issues.js");
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../services/routines.js");
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../routes/issues.js");
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../routes/authz.js");
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../middleware/index.js");
|
|
registerRouteMocks();
|
|
vi.clearAllMocks();
|
|
mockIssueService.addComment.mockResolvedValue(null);
|
|
mockIssueService.create.mockResolvedValue(makeIssue());
|
|
mockIssueService.findMentionedAgents.mockResolvedValue([]);
|
|
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue(makeIssue());
|
|
mockIssueService.getByIdentifier.mockResolvedValue(null);
|
|
mockIssueService.getRelationSummaries.mockResolvedValue({ blockedBy: [], blocks: [] });
|
|
mockIssueService.getWakeableParentAfterChildCompletion.mockResolvedValue(null);
|
|
mockIssueService.listWakeableBlockedDependents.mockResolvedValue([]);
|
|
mockIssueService.assertCheckoutOwner.mockResolvedValue({ adoptedFromRunId: null });
|
|
mockIssueService.update.mockResolvedValue(makeIssue());
|
|
mockAccessService.canUser.mockResolvedValue(true);
|
|
mockAccessService.decide.mockResolvedValue({
|
|
allowed: true,
|
|
action: "company_scope:read",
|
|
reason: "allow_test",
|
|
explanation: "Allowed by test mock.",
|
|
});
|
|
mockAccessService.hasPermission.mockResolvedValue(true);
|
|
mockAgentService.getById.mockResolvedValue({
|
|
id: "agent-1",
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
permissions: null,
|
|
});
|
|
mockExecutionWorkspaceService.getById.mockResolvedValue(null);
|
|
mockFeedbackService.listIssueVotesForUser.mockResolvedValue([]);
|
|
mockFeedbackService.saveIssueVote.mockResolvedValue({
|
|
vote: null,
|
|
consentEnabledNow: false,
|
|
sharingEnabled: false,
|
|
});
|
|
mockHeartbeatService.wakeup.mockResolvedValue(undefined);
|
|
mockHeartbeatService.reportRunActivity.mockResolvedValue(undefined);
|
|
mockHeartbeatService.getRun.mockResolvedValue(null);
|
|
mockHeartbeatService.getActiveRunForAgent.mockResolvedValue(null);
|
|
mockHeartbeatService.cancelRun.mockResolvedValue(null);
|
|
mockInstanceSettingsService.get.mockResolvedValue({
|
|
id: "instance-settings-1",
|
|
general: {
|
|
censorUsernameInLogs: false,
|
|
feedbackDataSharingPreference: "prompt",
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
mockInstanceSettingsService.listCompanyIds.mockResolvedValue(["company-1"]);
|
|
mockLogActivity.mockResolvedValue(undefined);
|
|
mockRoutineService.syncRunStatusForIssue.mockResolvedValue(undefined);
|
|
mockDbSelect.mockImplementation(() => ({ from: mockDbSelectFrom }));
|
|
mockDbSelectFrom.mockImplementation(() => ({ where: mockDbSelectWhere }));
|
|
mockDbSelectWhere.mockImplementation(() => ({
|
|
then: (onFulfilled: (rows: unknown[]) => unknown, onRejected?: (reason: unknown) => unknown) =>
|
|
Promise.resolve([{ companyId: "company-1", agentId: "agent-1", contextSnapshot: null }]).then(
|
|
onFulfilled,
|
|
onRejected,
|
|
),
|
|
}));
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("rejects agent callers that create issue workspace provision commands", async () => {
|
|
const app = await createApp({
|
|
type: "agent",
|
|
agentId: "agent-1",
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
source: "agent_key",
|
|
runId: "run-1",
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const res = await request(app)
|
|
.post("/api/companies/company-1/issues")
|
|
.send({
|
|
title: "Exploit",
|
|
executionWorkspaceSettings: {
|
|
workspaceStrategy: {
|
|
type: "git_worktree",
|
|
provisionCommand: "touch /tmp/paperclip-rce",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(res.status).toBe(403);
|
|
expect(res.body.error).toContain("host-executed workspace commands");
|
|
expect(mockIssueService.create).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("rejects agent callers that patch assignee adapter workspace teardown commands", async () => {
|
|
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue(makeIssue());
|
|
const app = await createApp({
|
|
type: "agent",
|
|
agentId: "agent-1",
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
source: "agent_key",
|
|
runId: "run-1",
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const res = await request(app)
|
|
.patch("/api/issues/issue-1")
|
|
.send({
|
|
assigneeAdapterOverrides: {
|
|
adapterConfig: {
|
|
workspaceStrategy: {
|
|
type: "git_worktree",
|
|
teardownCommand: "rm -rf /tmp/paperclip-rce",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(res.status).toBe(403);
|
|
expect(res.body.error).toContain("host-executed workspace commands");
|
|
expect(mockIssueService.update).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
|
|
});
|
|
});
|